Skip to main content

Comparison of Neutralizing Antibody Assays for Receptor Binding and Enzyme Activity of the Enzyme Replacement Therapeutic Naglazyme® (Galsulfase)

Abstract

Most patients receiving Naglazyme® (galsulfase, rhASB) enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis type VI develop an antibody response. To evaluate the impact of this response, two in vitro neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays were developed based on the two steps of the mechanism of action. Neutralization of enzyme activity was detected by inhibition of rhASB cleavage of a fluorogenic substrate. Neutralization of receptor binding was detected by decreased binding of labeled rhASB to immobilized soluble receptor. For the enzyme activity NAb assay, serum pretreatment was required to isolate antibodies from interfering phosphate ions, with sensitivity of ≤5 μg/mL. The receptor binding NAb assay used a five-fold dilution, with sensitivity of ≤40 μg/mL. Cutpoints for percent inhibition were based on 95% confidence intervals from naïve sera. Clinical samples were similarly likely to be positive in both assays than positive for neutralization of only one step in the mechanism of action. The two NAb assays yielded complementary information about potential neutralization of rhASB. Relative estimated sensitivity between neutralization assays did not correlate with the number of positive clinical samples or patients. In vitro NAb assays based on a well-understood mechanism of action provide specific information about the NAb mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Abbreviations

4-MU:

4-methylumbelliferone

4-MUS:

4-methylumbelliferyl sulfate

BSA:

bovine serum albumin

CIMPR:

calcium-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor

DPBS:

Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered solution

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

MPS VI:

mucopolysaccharidosis type VI, Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome

NAb:

neutralizing antibody

rhASB:

recombinant human Arylsulfatase B, recombinant human N-acetyl-galactosamine 4-sulfatase, Naglazyme

RT:

room temperature

SA-HRP:

streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase

sCIMPR:

soluble domain of CIMPR

References

  1. N. Casadevall, J. Nataf, B. Viron, A. Kolta, J. J. Kiladjian, P. Martin-Dupont, P. Michaud, T. Papo, V. Ugo, I. Teyssandier, B. Varet, and P. Mayeux. Pure red-cell aplasia and antierythropoietin antibodies in patients treated with recombinant erythropoietin. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:469–475 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. P. Hartung, C. Polman, A. Bertolotto, F. Deisenhammer, G. Giovannoni, E. Havrdova, B. Hemmer, J. Hillert, L. Kappos, B. Kieseier, J. Killestein, C. Malcus, M. Comabella, A. Pachner, H. Schellekens, F. Sellebjerg, K. Selmaj, and P. S. Sorensen. Neutralising antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: expert panel report. J. Neurol. 254:827–837 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. L. Bray, E. D. Gomperts, S. Courter, R. Gruppo, E. M. Gordon, M. Manco-Johnson, A. Shapiro, E. Scheibel, G. White III, and M. Lee. A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (recombinate): safety, efficacy, and inhibitor risk in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Study Group. Blood. 83:2428–2435 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. S. Kishnani, D. Corzo, M. Nicolino, B. Byrne, H. Mandel, W. L. Hwu, N. Leslie, J. Levine, C. Spencer, M. McDonald, J. Li, J. Dumontier, M. Halberthal, Y. H. Chien, R. Hopkin, S. Vijayaraghavan, D. Gruskin, D. Bartholomew, P. A. van der, J. P. Clancy, R. Parini, G. Morin, M. Beck, G. S. De la Gastine, M. Jokic, B. Thurberg, S. Richards, D. Bali, M. Davison, M. A. Worden, Y. T. Chen, and J. E. Wraith. Recombinant human acid [alpha]-glucosidase: major clinical benefits in infantile-onset Pompe disease. Neurology. 68:99–109 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Koren, L. A. Zuckerman, and A. R. Mire-Sluis. Immune responses to therapeutic proteins in humans—clinical significance, assessment and prediction. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 3:349–360 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. R. Mire-Sluis, Y. C. Barrett, V. Devanarayan, E. Koren, H. Liu, M. Maia, T. Parish, G. Scott, G. Shankar, E. Shores, S. J. Swanson, G. Taniguchi, D. Wierda, and L. A. Zuckerman. Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J. Immunol. Methods. 289:1–16 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Gupta, S. R. Indelicato, V. Jethwa, T. Kawabata, M. Kelley, A. R. Mire-Sluis, S. M. Richards, B. Rup, E. Shores, S. J. Swanson, and E. Wakshull. Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited to biological therapeutics. J. Immunol. Methods. 321:1–18 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. F. Neufield, and J. Muenzer. The mucopolysaccharidoses. In C. R. Scriver, A. L. Beaudet, W. S. Sly, and D. Valle (eds.), The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, 2001, pp. 3421–3452.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Winchester, A. Vellodi, and E. Young. The molecular basis of lysosomal storage diseases and their treatment. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28:150–154 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. L. Nyhan, and P. T. Ozand. Atlas of Metabolic Diseases, Chapman and Hall Medical, London; New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Harmatz, C. B. Whitley, L. Waber, R. Pais, R. Steiner, B. Plecko, P. Kaplan, J. Simon, E. Butensky, and J. J. Hopwood. Enzyme replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome). J. Pediatr. 144:574–580 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Harmatz, D. Ketteridge, R. Giugliani, N. Guffon, E. L. Teles, M. C. Miranda, Z. F. Yu, S. J. Swiedler, and J. J. Hopwood. Direct comparison of measures of endurance, mobility, and joint function during enzyme-replacement therapy of mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome): results after 48 weeks in a phase 2 open-label clinical study of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase. Pediatrics. 115:e681–e689 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Harmatz, W. G. Kramer, J. J. Hopwood, J. Simon, E. Butensky, and S. J. Swiedler. Pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulphatase enzyme replacement therapy in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome): a phase I/II study. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 94:61–68 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Harmatz, R. Giugliani, I. Schwartz, N. Guffon, E. L. Teles, M. C. Miranda, J. E. Wraith, M. Beck, L. Arash, M. Scarpa, Z. F. Yu, J. Wittes, K. I. Berger, M. S. Newman, A. M. Lowe, E. Kakkis, and S. J. Swiedler. Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase (recombinant human arylsulfatase B or rhASB) and follow-on, open-label extension study. J. Pediatr. 148:533–539 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. M. Dintzis, V. E. Velculescu, and S. R. Pfeffer. Receptor extracellular domains may contain trafficking information. Studies of the 300-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 269:12159–12166 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. C. Crawley, D. A. Brooks, V. J. Muller, B. A. Petersen, E. L. Isaac, J. Bielicki, B. M. King, C. D. Boulter, A. J. Moore, N. L. Fazzalari, D. S. Anson, S. Byers, and J. J. Hopwood. Enzyme replacement therapy in a feline model of Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 97:1864–1873 (1996).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. E. Sleat, Y. Wang, I. Sohar, H. Lackland, Y. Li, H. Li, H. Zheng, and P. Lobel. Identification and validation of mannose 6-phosphate glycoproteins in human plasma reveal a wide range of lysosomal and non-lysosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 5:1942–1956 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. S. Hanes. Studies on plant amylases: the effect of starch concentration upon the velocity of hydrolysis by the amylase of germinated barley. Biochem. J. 26:1406–1421 (1932).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. T. White, L. A. Martell, A. Van Tuyl, R. Boyer, L. Warness, G. Taniguchi, and E. Foehr. development, validation, and clinical implementation of an assay to measure total antibody response to naglazyme (galsulfase), AAPS J. (2008). doi:10.1208/s12248-008-9043-6.

  20. EMEA Guideline on Immunogenicity Assessment of Biotechnology-Derived Therapeutic Proteins, EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/14327/2006. April 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dawn Devereaux, Rebecca Dunham, Virginia Kalagorgevich, and Jessie Lam for additional testing support. Dr. Gary Taniguchi provided critical information about prior unsuccessful attempts at assay validation. The support from Computer Systems Validation, Instrument Validation, Analytical Chemistry, and Documentation Control at BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. was critical to the successful completion of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Foehr.

Additional information

Joleen T. White and Lisa A. Martell contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, J.T., Argento Martell, L., Prince, W.S. et al. Comparison of Neutralizing Antibody Assays for Receptor Binding and Enzyme Activity of the Enzyme Replacement Therapeutic Naglazyme® (Galsulfase). AAPS J 10, 439–449 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9048-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9048-1

Key words

  • enzyme replacement therapy
  • immunogenicity
  • naglazyme
  • neutralizing antibody
  • MPS VI