Skip to main content
Log in

Commerical reference shape standards use in the study of particle shape effect on laser diffraction particle size analysis

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of LGC Promochem AEA 1001 to AEA 1003 monosized fiberanalog shape standards in the study of the effect of particle shape on laser diffraction (LD) particle size analysis (psa). The psa of the AEA standards was conducted using LD psa systems from Beckman Coulter, Horiba, and Malvern Instruments. Flow speed settings, sample refractive index values, and sample cell types were varied to examine the extent to which the shape effect on LD psa results is modified by these variables. The volume and number probability plots resulting from these measurements were each characterized by a spread in the particle size distribution that roughly extended from the breadth to the longest dimension of the particles. For most of the selected sample refractive index values, the volume probability plots were characterized by apparent bimodal distributions. The results, therefore, provide experimental verification of the conclusions from theoretical studies of LD psa system response to monosized elliptical particles in which this apparent bimodality was the predicted result in the case of flow-oriented particles. The data support the findings from previous studies conducted over the past 10 years that have called into question the verity of the tenets of, and therefore the value of the application of, the equivalent spherical volume diameter theory and the random particle orientation model to the interpretation of LD psa results from measurements made on nonspherical particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jillavenkatesa A, Dapkunas SJ, Lum L-SH. NIST Recommended Practice Guide. Special publication 960-1. Particle Size Characterization. 2001. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce, US Government Printing Office. Avalable at. (xxxhttp://www.particlesize.com/Bibliography/NIST.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  2. How to choose a particle size analysis method. Metropolitan Computing Corporation Web site. Available at: http://www.particlesize. com/howto.htm. Accessed: June 27, 2005.

  3. Etzler FM, Sanderson MS. Particle size analysis: a comparative study of various methods. Part Part Syst Charact. 1995; 12: 217–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Etzler FM, Deanne R. Particle-size analysis: a comparison of various methods II. Part Part Syst Charact. 1997; 14: 278–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Etzler FM. Particle-size analysis: a comparison of methods. Am Pharm Rev. 2004; 7: 104–108.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Driscoll DF, Etzler F, Barber TA, Nehne J, Niemann W, Bistrian BR. Physicochemical assessments of parenteral lipid emulsions: light obscuration versus laser diffraction. Int J Pharm. 2001; 21: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabas N, Hiquily N, Laguuerie C. Response of laser diffraction particle sizer to anisometric particles. Part Part Syst Charact. 1994; 11: 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer E, Ramsland A. Particle size determination by automated microscopical imaging analysis with comparison to laser diffraction. J Pharm Sci. 1994; 84: 499–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heffels C, Heitzmann D, Hirleman ED, Scarlett B. Forward light scattering from sharp-edged crystals in Fraunhofer and anomalous diffraction approximations. Appl Opt. 1995; 34: 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heffels CMG, Verheijen PJT, Heitzmann D, Scarlett B. Correlation of the effect of particle shape on the size distribution measured with a laser diffraction instrument. Part Part Syst Charact. 1996; 13: 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaye BH, Alliet D, Switzer L, Turbitt-Daoust C. The effect of shape on intermethod correlation of techniques for characterizing the size distribution of a powder, I: correlating the size distribution measured by sieving, image analysis, and diffractometer methods. Part Part Syst Charact. 1997; 14: 219–255.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaye BH, Alliet D, Switzer L, Turbitt-Daoust C. The effect of shape on intermethod correlation of techniques for characterizing the size distribution of a powder, II: correlating the size distribution as measured by diffractometer methods, TSI-Amherst aerosol spectrometer, and Coulter counter. Part Part Syst Charact. 1999; 16: 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muhlenweg H, Hirleman ED. Laser diffraction spectroscopy: influence of particle shape and a shape adaptation technique. Part Part Syst Charact. 1998; 15: 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naito M, Hayawaka O, Nakahira K, Mori H, Tsubaki J. Effect of particle shape on the particle size distribution measured with commercial equipment. Powder Technol. 1998; 100; 52–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bowen P, Humphry-Baker R, Herard C. Particle size distribution measurement of regular anisotropic particles—cylinders and platelets. Proceedings of World Congress on Particle Technology 3. World Congress on Particle Technology: July 6–9, 1998; Brighton, UK.

  16. Bowen P, Sheng J, Jongen N. Particle size distribution measurement of anisotropic particles—cylinders and platelets—practical examples. Recent Progres en Genie des Procedes. 2001:251–256.

  17. Bowen P. Particle size distribution measurement from millimeters to nanometers and from rods to platelets. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2002; 23: 631–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mang JT, Skidmore CB, Kramer JF, Phillips DS, Quantitative morphological characterization of high explosive crystal grains by light diffraction and microscopy. Fraunhofer-Institut fur Chemische Technologie 31st International Conference; June 27–30, 2000; Karlsruhe, Germany, Munich, Germany: Fraun-hofer Gesellschaft; 2000:20-1—20-14.

  19. Matsuyama T, Yamamoto H, Scarlett B. Transformation of diffraction pattern due to ellipsoids into equivalent diameter distribution for spheres. Part Part Syst Charact. 2000; 17: 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pabst W, Kunes K, Gregorva E, Havrda J. Extraction of shape information from particle size measurements. Brit Ceram Trans. 2001; 100: 106–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu R, Di Guida A. Size and shape characterization of small particles. Powder Technol. 2003; 132: 145–153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berthold C, Klein R, Luhmann J, Nickel K. Characterization of fibres and fibre collectives with common laser diffractometers. Part Part Syst Charact. 2000; 17: 113–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasanna HR, Jefferson EH, Taylor JS, Hussain AS, Karuhn RF, Lyon RC. Comparative analysis of common particle sizing techniques for pharmaceutical powders. FDA Science Poster (2001). Available at: http://www.particlesize.com /Bibliography/PS%20FDA%20SF01%20Poster.pdf. Accessed: June 27, 2005.

  24. Mitchell JP. Aerosol generation and instrument calibration. In: Colbeck I, ed. Physical and Chemical Properties of Aerosols. London, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1998: 31–79.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burgess DJ, Duffy E, Etzler F, Hickey AJ. Particle size analysis: AAPS Workshop Report, cosponsored by the Food and Drug Administration and the United States Pharmacopeia. AAPS J. 2004; 6: E20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schellhamer M, Bowen P, Vaussourd C, Hofmann H. Accuracy of particle size distribution measurement of spherical glass beads (70–400μm) using laser diffraction. Recent Progres en Genie des Procedes. 2001; 15: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allen T. Powder Sampling and Particle Size Determination. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2003: 167.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zitoun KB, Sastry SK. Orientation distribution of solids in continuous solid-liquid flow in a vertical tube. Chem Eng Sci. 2004; 59: 2767–2775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jianzhong L, Weifeng Z, Zhaosheng Y. Numerical research on the orientation distribution of fibers immersed in laminar and turbulent pipe flows. J Aerosol Sci. 2004; 35: 63–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bumiller M, Carson J, Prescott J. A preliminary investigation concerning the effect of particle shape on a powder’s flow properties. Paper presented at: World Congress on Particle Technology 4; July 21–25, 2002; Sydney, Australia. Available at: http://www.malvern.co.uk.

  31. Rawle A. The importance of particle sizing to the coating industry, Part 1: particle size measurement. Adv Colour Sci Technol. 2002; 5: 1–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kippax P. Issues in the appraisal of laser diffraction particle sizing techniques. Pharm Tech Eur. 2005; 32–39.

  33. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 13320-1. Particle size analysis—laser diffraction methods, Part 1: general principles. ISO Standards Authority. 1999. Available at: http://www.iso.ch. Accessed: May 23, 2006.

  34. United States Pharmacopoeia (USP-NF). USP General Chapter <429>. Light diffraction measurement of particle size. Pharmacopoeial Forum. 2002; 29(4): 1293–1298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard N. Kelly.

Additional information

Published: May 26, 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, R.N., Kazanjian, J. Commerical reference shape standards use in the study of particle shape effect on laser diffraction particle size analysis. AAPS PharmSciTech 7, 49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1208/pt070249

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/pt070249

Keywords

Navigation