Abstract
The objective of this research was to estimate differences in heat and mass transfer between freeze dryers due to inherent design characteristics using data obtained from sublimation tests. This study also aimed to provide guidelines for convenient scale-up of the freeze-drying process. Data obtained from sublimation tests performed on laboratory-scale, pilot, and production freeze dryers were used to evaluate various heat and mass transfer parameters: nonuniformity in shelf surface temperatures, resistance of pipe, refrigeration system, and condenser. Emissivity measurements of relevant surfaces such as the chamber wall and the freeze dryer door were taken to evaluate the impact of atypical radiation heat transfer during scale-up. “Hot” and “cold” spots were identified on the shelf surface of different freeze dryers, and the impact of variation in shelf surface temperatures on the primary drying time and the product temperature during primary drying was studied. Calculations performed using emissivity measurements on different freeze dryers suggest that a front vial in the laboratory lyophilizer received 1.8 times more heat than a front vial in a manufacturing freeze dryer operating at a shelf temperature of −25°C and a chamber pressure of 150 mTorr during primary drying. Therefore, front vials in the laboratory are much more atypical than front vials in manufacturing. Steady-state heat and mass transfer equations were used to study a combination of different scaleup issues pertinent during lyophilization cycles commonly used for the freeze-drying of pharmaceuticals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rambhatla S, Pikal MJ. Heat and mass transfer issues in freeze-drying process development. In: Borchardt RT, Middaugh CR, eds. Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Aspects. Vol 2. Lyophilization of Biopharmaceuticals. Arlington, VA: AAPS Press; 2004: 75–109.
Pikal MJ. Use of laboratory data in freeze drying process design: heat and mass transfer coefficients and the computer simulation of freeze drying. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1985;39:115–139.
Pikal MJ, Roy ML, Shah S. Mass and heat transfer in vial freeze-drying of pharmaceuticals: role of the vial. J Pharm Sci. 1984;73: 1224–1237.
Incropera FP, Dewitt DP. Introduction to Heat Transfer: New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
Kobayashi M. Development of new refrigeration system and optimum geometry of the vapor condenser for pharmaceutical freeze dryers. In: Toei R, Mujumdar A, eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Drying Symposium; July 9–12, 1984; Kyoto, Japan; 2:464–471.
Liapis AI, Pikal MJ, Bruttini R. Research and development needs and opportunities in freeze drying. Drying Technol. 1996;14: 1265–1300.
Rambhatla S, Pikal MJ. Heat and mass transfer scale up issues during freeze drying, I: atypical radiation and the edge-vial effect. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4:e14.
Rambhatla S, Ramot R, Bhugra C, Pikal MJ. Heat and mass transfer scale up issues during freeze drying, II: control and characterization of the degree of supercooling. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5:e58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published: April 21, 2006
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rambhatla, S., Tchessalov, S. & Pikal, M.J. Heat and mass transfer scale-up issues during freeze-drying, III: Control and characterization of dryer differences via operational qualification tests. AAPS PharmSciTech 7, 39 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1208/pt070239
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/pt070239