References
FIP guidelines for dissolution testing of solid oral products [Duplicate publication of FIP guidelines for dissolution testing of solid oral products. Pharm Ind. 1997;59:760–766]. Dissolut Technol. 1997;4:5–14.
FDA guidance for Industry: dissolution testing of immediate release solid oral dosage forms, August 1997; extended release solid oral dosage forms: development, evaluation and application of in vitro/in vivo correlations, September 1997.
USP 24/NF 19, 〈1088〉 2000:2051.
FDA Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations. October 2000.
Shah VP, Tymes NW, Skelly JP. In vitro release profile of clonidine transdermal therapeutic systems and scopolamine patches. Pharm Res. 1989;6:346–351.
Shah VP, Elkins JS, Williams RL. Evaluation of the test system used for in vitro release of drugs from topical dermatological drug products. Pharm Develop Technol. 1999;4:377–385.
Fares HM, Zatz JL. Measurement of drug release from topical gels using two types of apparatus. Pharm Tech. 1995;19(1):52–58.
Shah VP, Elkins JS. In vitro release from corticosteroid ointments. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:1139–1140.
Higuchi WI. Analysis of data on medicament release from ointments. J Pharm Sci. 1962;51:802–804.
FDA Guidance for Industry: SUPAC-SS Nonsterile Semisolid Dosage Forms. Scale-Up and Post Approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; in Vitro Release Testing and in Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation. May 1997.
Flynn GL, Shah VP, Tenjarla SN, et al. Assessment of value and applications of in vitro testing of topical dermatological drug products. Pharm Res. 1999;16:1325–1330.
Honma K, Honma M, Kohsaka M, Fukuda N. Seasonal variation in the human circadian rhythm: dissociation between sleep and temperature rhythm. Am J Physiol. 1992; 262:885–991.
Gjellan K, Graffner C. Comparative dissolution studies of rectal formulations using the basket, the paddle and the flow-through methods, I: paracetamol in suppositories and soft gelatin capsules of both hydrophilic and lipophilic types. Acta Pharm Nord. 1989; 1, 343–354.
Gjellan K, Graffner C. Comparative dissolution studies of rectal formulations using the basket, the paddle and the flow-through methods, II: ibuprofen in suppositories of both hydrophilic and lipophilic types. Int J Pharm. 1994;112:233–240.
Setnikar I, Fantelli S. Liquefaction time of rectal suppositories, J Pharm Sci. 1962;51:566–571.
Chewing gum, medicated, drug release from. In: European Pharmacopoeia 4th ed. Strasbourg, France: Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of Europe; 2002:227–228, general chapter 2.9.25.
Diem K, Leutner C, eds. Documenta Geigy, Scientific Tables. 7th ed. Summit, NJ: Geigy Pharmaceuticals; 1975:643.
Shameem M, Lee H, DeLuca PP. A short term (accelerated release) approach to evaluate peptide release from PLGA depot formulations. AAPS Pharm Sci. 1999;1(3) article 7.
Sathe P, Tsong Y, Shah VP. In vitro dissolution profile comparison: statistics and analysis, model dependent approach. Pharm Res. 1996;13:1799–1803.
Makino K, Arakaw M, Kondo T. Preparation and in vitro degradation properties of polylactide microcapsules. Chem Pharm Bull. 1985;33(3):1195–1201.
Burgess DJ, Hussain AS, Ingallinera TS, Chen M. Assuring quality and performance of sustained and controlled release parenterals: workshop report. AAPS Pharm Sci. 2002;4(2) article 7.
Van Buskirk G, Gonzalez MA, Shah VP, et al. Scale-up of adhesive transdermal drug delivery systems. Pharm Res. 1997;14:848–852.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article represents the scientific opinion of many experts and, in particular, is derived from a series of workshops held under the auspices of the Federation International Pharmaceutique (FIP) and cosponsored by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (UK), the Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie (BPI), Colloquium Pharmaceuticum (Germany), the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS, US), and the US Food and Drug Administration. It is now presented as an FIP and AAPS position paper to support activities, programs, and decisions in the scientific, technical, and regulatory community. Even though it is a “final” position paper at this stage, the authors expect further progress to be made rapidly in the relevant areas. Thus, comments and additional contributions are welcome and may be considered for a revision of the position paper in due course.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siewert, M., Dressman, J., Brown, C.K. et al. FIP/AAPS guidelines to dissolution/in vitro release testing of novel/special dosage forms. AAPS PharmSciTech 4, 7 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1208/pt040107
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/pt040107