Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic profile of repifermin (KGF-2) in monkeys and comparative pharmacokinetics in humans

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSci Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Repifermin (truncated, recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor-2, KGF-2) was evaluated in cynomolgus monkeys and healthy humans during a phase 1 trial. Monkeys received vehicle or repifermin at 20, 75, or 200 μg/kg IV or 750 μg/kg subcutaneous (SC) daily for 29 days. Clinical observations were made during the entire dosing period. Gross and microscopic changes were assessed at necropsy. Pharmacokinetic parameters and immunogenicity were evaluated in these monkeys and in humans, following a single or 7 daily IV bolus injections of 1, 5, 25, or 50 μg/kg repifermin. In monkeys, repifermin was well tolerated, and histologic evaluation demonstrated dose-dependent, reversible thickening of the mucosa throughout the alimentary tract, except for the stomach. In the alimentary tract tissues, nonepithelial tissues were not affected, indicating a specificity of repifermin for epithelial cells. Pharmacokinetics in both monkeys and humans were dose proportional, showed lack of drug accumulation with repeated daily dosing, and were characterized by high volumes of distribution and clearance rates, indicating substantial tissue binding and metabolism. Repifermin was not markedly immunogenic following multiple daily IV injections in either species. Serum repifermin concentrations in humans were comparable to those attained in monkeys that produced significant pharmacological effects on epithelial cells in the alimentary tract. These findings provide additional support for the ongoing clinical development of repifermin for diseases involving epithelial injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruben SM, Jimenez P, Duan DR, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor-2. US patent 6 077 692. June 20, 2000.

  2. Igarashi M, Finch PW, Aaronson SA. Characterization of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (FGF-10) reveals functional similarities with keratinocyte growth factor (FGF-7). J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13230–13235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beer HD, Florence C, Dammeier J, McGuire L, Werner S, Duan DR. Mouse fibroblast growth factor-10: cDNA cloning, protein characterization, and regulation of mRNA expression. Oncogene. 1997;15:2211–2218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamasaki M, Miyake A, Tagashira S, Itoh N. Structure and expression of the rat mRNA encoding a novel member of the fibroblast growth factor family. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:15918–15921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emoto H, Tagashira S, Mattei M-G, et al. Structure and expression of human fibroblast growth factor-10. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:23191–23194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Finch PW, Rubin JS, Miki T, Ron D, Aaronson SA. Human KGF is FGF-related with properties of a paracrine effector of epithelial cell growth. Science. 1989;245:752–755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin GR. The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1571–1586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellusci S, Grindley J, Emoto H, Itoh N, Hogan BLM. Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF-10) and branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Development. 1997;124:4867–4878.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sekine K, Ohuchi H, Fujiwara M, et al. FGF-10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat Genet. 1999;21:138–141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jimenez PA, Greenwalt D, Mendrick DL, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor-2. In: Narula SK, Coffman R, eds. New Cytokines as Potential Drugs. Basel, Switzerland: Birkh er Verlag; 2000:101–119.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldfarb M. Functions of fibroblast growth factors in vertebrate development. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1996;7:311–325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miceli R, Hubert M, Santiago G, et al. Efficacy of keratinocyte growth factor-2 in dextran sulfate sodium-induced murine colitis. J Pharmacol Exper Ther. 1999;290:464–471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han DS, Li F, Holt L, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor-2 (FGF-10) promotes healing of experimental small intestinal ulceration in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:G1011-G1022.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Soler PM, Wright TE, Smith PD, et al. In vivo characterization of keratinocyte growth factor-2 as a potential wound healing agent. Wound Rep Reg. 1999;7:172–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sonis ST. Oral complications (of mucositis). In: Holland JF, Bast RC Jr, Morton DL, Frei E III, Kufe DW, Weichselbaum RR, eds. Cancer Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1997:3255–3264.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences; National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mordenti J, Chen SA, Moore JA, Ferraiolo BL, Green JD. Interspecies scaling of clearance and volume of distribution data for five therapeutic proteins. Pharm Res. 1991;8:1351–1359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freireich EJ, Gehan EA, Rall DP, Schmidt LH, Skipper HE. Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, dog, monkey, and man. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:219–244.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein KE. Immunogenicity of recombinant proteins. Proceedings of Preclinical and Clinical Development of Biological Therapeutics. Annapolis, MD: Center for Drug Development Science. October 17–19. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schaer GL, Fink MP, Chernow B, Ahmed S, Parrillo JE. Renal hemodynamics and prostaglandin E2 excretion in a nonhuman primate model of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:52–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levine RR. Pharmacology: Drug Actions and Reactions, 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co; 1990;110.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mashimo H, Wu D-C, Podolsky DK, Fishman MC. Impaired defense of intestinal mucosa in mice lacking intestinal Trefoil factor. Science. 1996;274:262–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchese C, Mancini P, Belleudi F. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of keratinocyte growth factor. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:3571–3527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Sung.

Additional information

Published: April 25, 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sung, C., Parry, T.J., Riccobene, T.A. et al. Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic profile of repifermin (KGF-2) in monkeys and comparative pharmacokinetics in humans. AAPS PharmSci 4, 8 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1208/ps040206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/ps040206

Key Words

Navigation