Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear-induced variability in the United States pharmacopeia apparatus 2: Modifications to the existing system

  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydrodynamics within the United States Pharmacopeia Apparatus 2 have been shown to be highly non-uniform with a potential to yield substantial variability in dissolution rate measurements. Through the use of readily available engineering tools, several geometric modifications to the device were evaluated in this study. Specifically, we examined the influence of impeller clearance, agitator type (radial and axial), and vessel geometry (PEAK vessel) on the fluid flow properties and their relation to measured dissolution rates. Increasing the impeller clearance was observed to exacerbate the heterogeneity in shear and would likely result in greater variability in dissolution measurements. Altering the impeller type was shown to yield changes in the hydrodynamic behavior; however, the overall properties and problems with the test remain the same. Use of the PEAK vessel was observed to reduce shear heterogeneity in the regions where tablets are most likely to visit during testing; however, higher shear rates may result in the inability to discriminate between true differences in dissolution rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banakar UV.Pharmaceutical Dissolution Testing. Vol 49. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox DC, Furman WB. Systematic error associated with Apparatus 2 of theUSP dissolution test I: effects of physical alignment of the dissolution apparatus.J Pharm Sci. 1982;71:451–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore TW, Hamilton JF, Kerner CM. Dissolution testing: limitations of theUSP prednisone and salicylic acid calibrator tablets.Pharmaceutical Forum. 1995;21:1387–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Qureshi SA, McGilveray IJ. Typical variability in drug dissolution testing: study withUSP and FDA calibrator tablets and a marketed drug (Glibenclamide) product.Eur J Pharm Sci. 1999;7:249–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Qureshi SA, Shabnam J. Cause of high variability in drug dissolution testing and its impact on setting tolerances.Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;12:271–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. FDCReports. Recalls prompted by FDA on the increase.The Gold Sheet. 2001;35:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FDCReports. Counterfeits pose special recall challenge.The Gold Sheet. 2002;36:1–26.

  8. FDCReports. Spike in potency-related problems contributes to overall rise in 2002 recalls.The Gold Sheet. 2003;37:1–20.

  9. Levy G, Leonards JR, Procknal JA. Development of in vitro dissolution tests which correlate quantitatively with dissolution ratelimited drug absorption in man.J Pharm Sci. 1965;54:1719–1722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamlin WE, Nelson E, Ballard BE, Wagner JG. Loss of sensitivity in distinguishing real differences in dissolution rates due to increasing intensity of agitation.J Pharm Sci. 1962;51:432–435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kukura J, Baxter JL, Muzzio FJ. Shear distribution and variability in the USP Apparatus 2 under turbulent conditions.Int J Pharm. 2004;279:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beckett AH, Quach TT, Kurs GS. Improved hydrodynamics forUSP Apparatus 2.Diss Tec. 1996;3:7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Collins CC, Nair RR. Comparative evaluation of mixing dynamics inUSP Apparatus 2 using standardUSP vessels and PEAK vessels.Diss Tech. 1998;5:17–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson K, Bittorf KJ. Validating the Galerkin Least-Squares Finite Element Methods in predicting mixing flows in stirred tank reactors. Paper presented at: The 10th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Proceedings; June 9–11, 2002; Windsor, Ontario.

  15. Zalc JM.Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Tools for Investigating Flow and Mixing in Industrial Systems: The Koch-Glitsch SMX Static Mixer and a Three Rushton Turbine Stirred Tank. New Brunswick, NJ: Department of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zalc JM, Alvarez MM, Muzzio FJ. Extensive validation of computed laminar flow in a stirred tank with three Rushton turbines.AIChE J. 2001;47:2144–2154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mauger JW, Brockson R, De S, Gray VA, Robinson D. Intrinsic dissolution performance ofUSP Apparatus 2 using modified salicylic acid calibrator tablets: proof of principle.Diss Tech. 2003;10:6–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University, 98 Brett Road, 08854-8058, Piscataway, NJ

    Jennifer L. Baxter, Joseph Kukura & Fernando J. Muzzio

Authors
  1. Jennifer L. Baxter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph Kukura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernando J. Muzzio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando J. Muzzio.

Additional information

Published: January 3, 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baxter, J.L., Kukura, J. & Muzzio, F.J. Shear-induced variability in the United States pharmacopeia apparatus 2: Modifications to the existing system. AAPS J 7, 83 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070483

Keywords

Search

Navigation