Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges in the transition to model-based development

  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Practitioners of the art and science of pharmacometrics are well aware of the considerable effort required to successfully complete modeling and simulation activities for drug development programs. This is particularly true because of the current, ad hoc implementation wherein modeling and simulation activities are piggybacked onto traditional development programs. This effort, coupled with the failure to explicitly design development programs around modeling and simulation, will continue to be an important obstacle, to the successful transition to model-based drug development. Challenges with timely data availability, high data discard rates, delays in completing modeling and simulation activities, and resistance of development teams to the use of modeling and simulation in decision making are all symptoms of an immature process capability for performing modeling and simulation.

A process that will fulfill the promise of model-based development will require the development and deployment of three critical elements. The first is the infrastructure—the data definitions and assembly processes that will allow efficient pooling of data across trials and development programs. The second is the process itself—developing guidelines for deciding when and where modeling and simulation should be applied and the criteria for assessing performance and impact. The third element concerns the organization and culture—the establishment of truly integrated, multidisciplinary, and multiorganizational development teams trained in the use of modeling and simulation in decision-making. Creating these capabilities, infrastructure, and incentivizations are critical to realizing the full value of modeling and simulation in drug development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grasela TH, Sheiner LB. Population pharmacokinetics of procainamide from routine clinical data.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984;9:545–554.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beal SL, Sheiner LB, eds.NONMEM Users Guides. San Francisco: University of California at San Francisco; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;61:275–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Data on file. Congnigen Corporation, 395 Youngs Rd, Buffalo, NY 14221.

  6. Antal EJ, Grasela TH Jr, Smith RB. An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part IIO Prospective data collection versus retrospective data assembly.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;46:552–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmith VD, Fiedler-Kelly J, Phillips L, Grasela TH Jr. Prospective use of population pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics in the development of cisatracurium.Pharm Res. 1997;14:91–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grasela TH, Antal EJ, Fiedler-Kelly J, et al. An automated drug concentration screening and quality assurance program for clinical trials.Drug Inf J. 1999;33:273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FDA. Guidance for Industry:Population Pharmacokinetics. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart JJ, Allison PN Johnson RS. Putting a price on biotechnology.Nature Biotechnology. 2001;19:813–817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thaddeus H. Grasela.

Additional information

Published: October 5, 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grasela, T.H., Fiedler-Kelly, J., Walawander, C.A. et al. Challenges in the transition to model-based development. AAPS J 7, 49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070249

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070249

Keywords

Navigation