Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, 20:132 | Cite as

Optimization of Chitosan-α-casein Nanoparticles for Improved Gene Delivery: Characterization, Stability, and Transfection Efficiency

  • João Panão Costa
  • Sofia Carvalho
  • Sandra Jesus
  • Edna Soares
  • Ana Patrícia Marques
  • Olga BorgesEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Among non-viral vectors, the cationic polymer chitosan has gained attention as a gene delivery system. We hypothesized that the addition of casein into the nanoparticle’s structure would facilitate a proper gene transfer. The work herein presented aimed to optimize the production method of chitosan-casein nanoparticles (ChiCas NPs) and to test their ability as a gene delivery system. ChiCas NPs formulation optimization was carried out by analyzing several characteristics such as NP size, zeta potential, and chitosan and casein incorporation efficacy. The best formulation developed presented small and homogenous particle size (around 335 nm) and positive zeta potential (≈ + 38 mV), and showed to be stable for 34 weeks both, at 4°C and 20°C. The particles were further used to entrap or to adsorb DNA and form NPs-DNA complexes. In vitro transfection studies, carried out in COS-7 cells, suggested a low transfection efficiency of the different NPs:DNA ratios tested, comparatively to the positive control. Nonetheless, we could observe that the complexes with larger sizes presented better transfection results than those with smaller diameters. To conclude, ChiCas NPs have great technological potential since the preparation process is very simple, and the DNA incorporation efficacy is very high and shows to be physically very stable. The NPs:DNA ratio still needs to be optimized with the aim of achieving better transfection results and being able to anticipate a high gene expression on DNA-based vaccination studies.

KEY WORDS

chitosan nanoparticles α-casein glucan gene delivery system DNA vaccine 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Mansouri S, Lavigne P, Corsi K, Benderdour M, Beaumont E, Fernandes JC. Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as non-viral vectors in gene therapy: strategies to improve transfection efficacy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00155-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jesus S, Soares E, Borchard G, Borges O. Poly-ϵ-caprolactone/chitosan nanoparticles provide strong adjuvant effect for hepatitis B antigen. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(19):2335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park J, Kim WJ. Current status of gene delivery: spotlight on nanomaterial-polymer hybrids. J Drug Target. 2012;20(8):648–66.  https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2012.704634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nitta SK, Numata K. Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(1):1629–54.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garaiova Z, Strand SP, Reitan NK, Lelu S, Storset SO, Berg K, et al. Cellular uptake of DNA-chitosan nanoparticles: the role of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated pathways. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012;51(5):1043–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lebre F, Borchard G, Faneca H, De Lima MCP, Borges O. Intranasal administration of novel chitosan nanoparticle/DNA complexes induces antibody response to hepatitis B surface antigen in mice. Mol Pharm. 2016;13(2):472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas M, Klibanov AM. Non-viral gene therapy: polycation-mediated DNA delivery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;62(1):27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1321-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morille M, Passirani C, Vonarbourg A, Clavreul A, Benoit JP. Progress in developing cationic vectors for non-viral systemic gene therapy against cancer. Biomaterials. 2008;29(24–25):3477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kay MA. State-of-the-art gene-based therapies: the road ahead. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(5):316–28.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2971.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paiva D, Ivanova G, Pereira MD, Rocha S. Chitosan conjugates for DNA delivery. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:11893–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp51215k.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldrick P. The safety of chitosan as a pharmaceutical excipient. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;56(3):290–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duceppe N, Tabrizian M. Advances in using chitosan-based nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(10):1191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hejazi R, Amiji M. Chitosan-based gastrointestinal delivery systems. J Control Release. 2003;89(2):151–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00126-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM. Recent advances on chitosan-based micro- and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100(1):5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borges O, Borchard G, de Sousa A, Junginger HE, Cordeiro-da-Silva A. Induction of lymphocytes activated marker CD69 following exposure to chitosan and alginate biopolymers. Int J Pharm. 2007;337(1–2):254–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anal AK, Tobiassen A, Flanagan J, Singh H. Preparation and characterization of nanoparticles formed by chitosan-caseinate interactions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2008;64(1):104–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.01.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lebre F, Bento D, Jesus S, Borges O. Chitosan-based nanoparticles as a hepatitis B antigen delivery system. In: Methods in Enzymology, vol. 509. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc; 2012. p. 127–42.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mao HQ, Roy K, Troung-Le VL, Janes KA, Lin KY, Wang Y, et al. Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency. J Control Release. 2001;70(3):399–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00361-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao Y, Xu Z, Chen S, Gu W, Chen L, Li Y. Arginine-chitosan/DNA self-assemble nanoparticles for gene delivery: in vitro characteristics and transfection efficiency. Int J Pharm. 2008;359(1–2):241–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elzoghby AO, Abo El-Fotoh WS, Elgindy NA. Casein-based formulations as promising controlled release drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2011;153(3):206–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.02.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elzoghby AO, Samy WM, Elgindy NA. Protein-based nanocarriers as promising drug and gene delivery systems. J Control Release. 2012;161(1):38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soto ER, O’Connell O, Dikengil F, Peters PJ, Clapham PR, Ostroff GR. Targeted delivery of glucan particle encapsulated gallium nanoparticles inhibits HIV growth in human macrophages. J Drug Deliv. 2016;2016(8520629):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soto ER, Caras AC, Kut LC, Castle MK, Ostroff GR. Glucan particles for macrophage targeted delivery of nanoparticles. J Drug Deliv. 2012;2012:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/143524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tesz GJ, Aouadi M, Prot M, Nicoloro SM, Boutet E, Amano SU, et al. Glucan particles for selective delivery of siRNA to phagocytic cells in mice. Biochem J. 2011;436(2):351–62.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20110352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendelovits A, Prat T, Gonen Y, Rytwoa G. Improved colorimetric determination of chitosan concentrations by dye binding. Appl Spectrosc. 2012;66(8):979–82.  https://doi.org/10.1366/12-06591a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wischke C, Borchert HH. Increased sensitivity of chitosan determination by a dye binding method. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341(18):2978–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.10.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muzzarelli RA. Colorimetric determination of chitosan. Anal Biochem. 1998;260(2):255–7.  https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1998.2705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cordeiro RA, Santo D, Farinha D, Serra A, Faneca H, Coelho JFJ. High transfection efficiency promoted by tailor-made cationic tri-block copolymer-based nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2017;47:113–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jesus S, Borchard G, Borges O. Freeze dried chitosan/poly-ε-caprolactone and poly-ε-caprolactone nanoparticles: evaluation of their potential as DNA and antigen delivery systems. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther. 2013;4(7):1–11.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nasti A, Zaki NM, De Leonardis P, Ungphaiboon S, Sansongsak P, Rimoli MG, et al. Chitosan/TPP and chitosan/TPP-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles: systematic optimisation of the preparative process and preliminary biological evaluation. Pharm Res. 2009;26(8):1918–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9908-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fernández-Urrusuno R, Calvo P, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Enhancement of nasal absorption of insulin using chitosan nanoparticles. Pharm Res. 1999;16:1576–81.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018908705446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Senior J, Trimble K, Maskiewicz R. Interaction of positively-charged liposomes with blood: implications for their application in vivo. BBA - Biomembr. 1991;1070(1):173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarah P, Clarke, B. Development of hierarchical magnetic nanocomposite materials for biomedical applications thesis submitted for the degree of doctor of Philosophy. 2013, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2013.862292.
  34. 34.
    Strand SP, Lelu S, Reitan NK, de Lange Davies C, Artursson P, Vårum KM. Molecular design of chitosan gene delivery systems with an optimized balance between polyplex stability and polyplex unpacking. Biomaterials. 2010;31(5):975–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Panão Costa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sofia Carvalho
    • 1
  • Sandra Jesus
    • 1
    • 2
  • Edna Soares
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ana Patrícia Marques
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olga Borges
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Center for Neuroscience and Cell BiologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations