Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 2812–2817 | Cite as

Sensitive Determination of Fentanyl in Low-Volume Serum Samples by LC-MS/MS

  • Suresh Kumar Swaminathan
  • James Fisher
  • Karunya K. Kandimalla
Research Article Theme: Team Science and Education for Pharmaceuticals: the NIPTE Model
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Theme: Team Science and Education for Pharmaceuticals: the NIPTE Model

Abstract

Fentanyl is a widely used drug in the management of pain. Present LC-MS/MS methods for analysis of fentanyl require a large volume of serum, but yet the sensitivity was at about 50 pg/mL. Here, we report a modified liquid-liquid extraction method for the analysis of fentanyl in serum. The method is very sensitive with a LLOQ of 5 pg/mL while using only 0.175 mL of serum for analysis. The separation was performed on a Zorbax XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm, 600 bar) using a mobile phase of water: acetonitrile (70:30 v/v) with 0.1% formic acid that was pumped isocratically at a flow rate of 0.5 mL per minute. The calibration curve was found to be linear over a range of 5–10,000 pg/mL. The inter-day and intra-day accuracy and precision were tested using low (20 pg/mL), medium (1000 pg/mL), and high (5000 pg/mL) quality control samples of fentanyl prepared in blank human serum and were within ± 15% of the nominal value. Fentanyl was also found to be stable in various storage and sample preparation conditions, including short-term bench-top storage (for 5 h), freeze-thaw cycling (three cycles), long-term frozen condition (4.5 months at - 70°C), and post-preparative storage (for 48 h).

KEY WORDS

fentanyl LC-MS/MS validation analytical method human serum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge Dr. Timothy Wiedmann, Department of Pharmaceutics, UMN, for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Nelson L, Schwaner R. Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology. J Med Toxicol. 2009;5(4):230–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veldhorst-Janssen NM, Fiddelers AA, van der Kuy PH, Kessels AG, Theunissen HM, van der Hulst RR, et al. Pharmacokinetics, analgesic effect, and tolerability of a single preprocedural dose of intranasal fentanyl in patients undergoing drain removal after breast reduction or augmentation surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2010;32(7):1427–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phipps JA, Sabourin MA, Buckingham W, Strunin L. Detection of picogram concentrations of fentanyl in plasma by gas–liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1983;272(2):392–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bista SR, Lobb M, Haywood A, Hardy J, Tapuni A, Norris R. Development, validation and application of an HPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of fentanyl and nor-fentanyl in human plasma and saliva. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;960:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Portier EJ, de Blok K, Butter JJ, van Boxtel CJ. Simultaneous determination of fentanyl and midazolam using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999;723(1–2):313–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar K, Ballantyne JA, Baker AB. A sensitive assay for the simultaneous measurement of alfentanil and fentanyl in plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1996;14(6):667–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huynh NH, Tyrefors N, Ekman L, Johansson M. Determination of fentanyl in human plasma and fentanyl and norfentanyl in human urine using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;37(5):1095–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koch DE, Isaza R, Carpenter JW, Hunter RP. Simultaneous extraction and quantitation of fentanyl and norfentanyl from primate plasma with LC/MS detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004;34(3):577–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strayer KE, Antonides HM, Juhascik MP, Daniulaityte R, Sizemore IE. LC-MS/MS-based method for the multiplex detection of 24 fentanyl analogues and metabolites in whole blood at sub ng mL(-1) concentrations. ACS Omega. 2018;3(1):514–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sofalvi S, Schueler HE, Lavins ES, Kaspar CK, Brooker IT, Mazzola CD, et al. An LC-MS-MS method for the analysis of carfentanil, 3-methylfentanyl, 2-furanyl fentanyl, acetyl fentanyl, fentanyl and norfentanyl in postmortem and impaired-driving cases. J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu M, Abdallah IA, Shin SH, Hammell DC, Stinchcomb AL, Hassan HE. LC-MS determination of fentanyl in human serum and application to a fentanyl transdermal delivery pharmacokinetic study. Bioanalysis. 2017;9(20):1551–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tiscione NB, Wegner K. Validation of the Neogen(R) Fentanyl ELISA kit for blood and urine. J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(4):313–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang BT, Colby JM, Wu AH, Lynch KL. Cross-reactivity of acetylfentanyl and risperidone with a fentanyl immunoassay. J Anal Toxicol. 2014;38(9):672–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomasy SM, Mama KR, Stanley SD. Comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and radioimmunoassay for measurement of fentanyl and determination of pharmacokinetics in equine plasma. J Anal Toxicol. 2008;32(9):754–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghassabian S, Moosavi SM, Valero YG, Shekar K, Fraser JF, Smith MT. High-throughput assay for simultaneous quantification of the plasma concentrations of morphine, fentanyl, midazolam and their major metabolites using automated SPE coupled to LC-MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012;903:126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clavijo CF, Thomas JJ, Cromie M, Schniedewind B, Hoffman KL, Christians U, et al. A low blood volume LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of fentanyl and its major metabolites norfentanyl and despropionyl fentanyl in children. J Sep Sci. 2011;34(24):3568–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verplaetse R, Henion J. Quantitative determination of opioids in whole blood using fully automated dried blood spot desorption coupled to on-line SPE-LC-MS/MS. Drug Test Anal. 2016;8(1):30–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verplaetse R, Tytgat J. Development and validation of a sensitive ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of fentanyl and its major metabolite norfentanyl in urine and whole blood in forensic context. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878(22):1987–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coopman V, Cordonnier J, Pien K, Van Varenbergh D. LC-MS/MS analysis of fentanyl and norfentanyl in a fatality due to application of multiple Durogesic transdermal therapeutic systems. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169(2–3):223–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahlke NS, Ziesenitz V, Mikus G, Skopp G. Quantitative low-volume assay for simultaneous determination of fentanyl, norfentanyl, and minor metabolites in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Int J Legal Med. 2014;128(5):771–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gu H, Liu G, Wang J, Aubry A-F, Arnold ME. Selecting the correct weighting factors for linear and quadratic calibration curves with least-squares regression algorithm in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays and impacts of using incorrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and assay performance. Anal Chem. 2014;86(18):8959–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodbard D. Statistical quality control and routine data processing for radioimmunoassays and immunoradiometric assays. Clin Chem. 1974;20(10):1255–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Naidong W, Bu H, Chen YL, Shou WZ, Jiang X, Halls TD. Simultaneous development of six LC-MS-MS methods for the determination of multiple analytes in human plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002;28(6):1115–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Breindahl T, Petersen KK, Rousing ML, Andreasen K, Arendt-Nielsen L, Hindersson P. Quantification of fentanyl in human serum by column-switching liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. J Bioanal Biomed. 2011;3(6):103–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suresh Kumar Swaminathan
    • 1
  • James Fisher
    • 2
  • Karunya K. Kandimalla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutics, College of PharmacyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.The Clinical Pharmacology Analytical Services (CPAS) Laboratory, College of PharmacyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations