AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 1320–1327 | Cite as

Ultrasound-assisted powder-coating technique to improve content uniformity of low-dose solid dosage forms

  • Natalja Genina
  • Heikki Räikkönen
  • Osmo Antikainen
  • Jyrki Heinämäki
  • Jouko Yliruusi
Research Article

ABSTRACT

An ultrasound-assisted powder-coating technique was used to produce a homogeneous powder formulation of a low-dose active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The powdered particles of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC; Avicel® PH-200) were coated with a 4% m/V aqueous solution of riboflavin sodium phosphate, producing a uniform drug layer on the particle surfaces. It was possible to regulate the amount of API in the treated powder. The thickness of the API layer on the surface of the MCC particles increased near linearly as the number of coating cycles increased, allowing a precise control of the drug content. The tablets (n = 950) prepared from the coated powder showed significantly improved weight and content uniformity in comparison with the reference tablets compressed from a physical binary powder mixture. This was due to the coated formulation remaining uniform during the entire tabletting process, whereas the physical mixture of the powders was subject to segregation. In conclusion, the ultrasound-assisted technique presented here is an effective tool for homogeneous drug coating of powders of irregular particle shape and broad particle size distribution, improving content uniformity of low-dose API in tablets, and consequently, ensuring the safe delivery of a potent active substance to patients.

Key words

content uniformity homogeneity low-dose API powder coating ultrasound 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Jivraj M, Martini LG, Thomson CM. An overview of the different excipients useful for the direct compression of tablets. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3:58–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prescott JK, Hossfeld RJ. Maintaining product uniformity and uninterrupted flow to direct compression tablet presses. Pharm Technol. 1994;18:99–114.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolhuis GK, Chowhan ZT. Materials for direct compression. In: Alderborn G, Nysröm C, editors. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. p. 420–500.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thiel WJ, Nguyen LT, Sberna FJ. Content uniformity of microdose tablets (dosage 1 microgram­­10 mg) produced by fluid bed granulation of interactive mixtures. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1986;38:335–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Haan P, Thys CP, inventors. Compressed dry-granulation desogestrel tablets. United States patent US 6063403. 1997 Dec 18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greaves FC, Beasley MW, Suddith AW, Swarbrick J. Novel approaches to the preparation of low-dose solid dosage forms. Pharm Technol. 1995;188:60–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parikh DM. Introduction. In: Parikh DM, editor. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 1–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    am Ende MT, Moses SK, Carella AJ, Gadkari RA, Graul TW, Otano AL, et al. Improving the content uniformity of a low-dose tablet formulation through roller compaction optimization. Pharm Dev Technol. 2007;12:391–404. doi:10.1080/10837450701369253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu L-S, Pang J, Chen J-G, Hussain MA. Dry blending process scale-up for a very low dose drug candidate. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2000;1:article TN2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Haan P, Deurloo M, inventors. Low steroid dose dry pharmaceutical preparation. United States patent US 5382434. 1995 Jan 17.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lerner LJ, inventor. Modified sequential oral contraceptive. United States patent US 3568828. 1971 Mar 9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grawe D, Hoesel P, Moellmann P, Timpe C, Dittgen M, Matthey K, inventors. Homogeneous preformulations containing high concentrations of steroids, for producing low-dose solid and semi-solid pharmaceutical preparations. United States patent US 6290931B1. 2001 Sep 18.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, editors. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genina N, Räikkönen H, Heinämäki J, Antikainen O, Siiriä S, Veski P, et al. Effective modification of particle surface properties using ultrasonic water mist. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10:282–8. doi:10.1208/s12249-009-9208-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bodson C, Dewé W, Hubert Ph, Delattre L. Comparison of FT-NIR transmission and UV-vis spectrophotometry to follow the mixing kinetics and to assay low-dose tablets containing riboflavin. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;41:783–90. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo HX, Heinämäki J, Yliruusi J. Characterization of particle deformation during compression measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Int J Pharm. 1999;186:99–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalja Genina
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heikki Räikkönen
    • 1
  • Osmo Antikainen
    • 1
  • Jyrki Heinämäki
    • 1
  • Jouko Yliruusi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of Helsinki, FinlandHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Tartu, EstoniaTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations