AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 1257–1267 | Cite as

A Statistical Approach to Optimize the Spray Drying of Starch Particles: Application to Dry Powder Coating

  • Luca Bilancetti
  • Denis Poncelet
  • Catherine Loisel
  • Stefania Mazzitelli
  • Claudio Nastruzzi
Research Article

Abstract

This article describes the preparation of starch particles, by spray drying, for possible application to a dry powder coating process. Dry powder coating consists of spraying a fine powder and a plasticizer on particles. The efficiency of the coating is linked to the powder morphological and dimensional characteristics. Different experimental parameters of the spray-drying process were analyzed, including type of solvent, starch concentration, rate of polymer feeding, pressure of the atomizing air, drying air flow, and temperature of drying air. An optimization and screening of the experimental parameters by a design of the experiment (DOE) approach have been done. Finally, the produced spray-dried starch particles were conveniently tested in a dry coating process, in comparison to the commercial initial starch. The obtained results, in terms of coating efficiency, demonstrated that the spray-dried particles led to a sharp increase of coating efficiency value.

KEY WORDS

dry coating microparticles spray drying starch 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Obara S, Maruyama N, Nishiyama Y, Kokubo H. Dry coating: an innovative enteric coating method using a cellulose derivative. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1999;47:51–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pearnchob N, Bodmeier R. Dry powder coating of pellets with micronized Eudragit RS for extended drug release. Pharm Res. 2003;20(12):1970–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pearnchob N, Bodmeier R. Dry polymer powder coating and comparison with conventional liquid-based coatings for Eudragit(R) RS, ethyl cellulose and shellac. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56(3):363–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearnchob N, Bodmeier R. Coating of pellets with micronized ethyl cellulose particles by a dry powder coating technique. Int J Pharm. 2003;268(1–2):1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerea M, Zheng W, Young C, McGinity JW. A novel powder coating process for attaining taste masking and moisture protective films applied to tablets. Int J Pharm. 2000;279:127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagai T, Sekigawa F, Hoshi N, McGinity JW. Applications of HPMC and HPMCAS aqueous film coating of pharmaceutical dosage forms. In: Dekker Marcel, editor. Aqueous polymeric coatings for pharmaceutical dosage forms. New York: J. W. McGinity; 1998. p. 81–152.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cunningham CR, Fegely KA. One-step aqueous enteric coating system. Scale-up evaluation. Pharm Tech Eur. 2001;13:48–54.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ivanova E, Teunou E, Poncelet D. Encapsulation of water sensitive products: effectiveness and assessment of fluid bed dry coating. J Food Eng. 2005;71:223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terebesi I. Alternative polymers and processes for coating. Ph.D. Thesis, Berlin, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Esposito E, Roncarati R, Cortesi R, Cervellati F, Nastruzzi C. Production of Eudragit microparticles by spray drying technique: influence of experimental parameters on morphological and dimensional characteristics. Pharmaceut Develop Technol. 2000;5:267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masters K. Spray drying handbook. New York: Longman; 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Büchi Labortechnik AG. Training paper spray drying. Switzerland: Büchi Labortechnik AG; 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kester JJ, Fennema O. Edible films and coatings: a review. Food Technol. 1986;40:47–59.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dimantov A, Greenberg M, Kesselman E, Shimoni E. Study of high amylose corn starch as food grade enteric coating in a microcapsule model system. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2004;5:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bilancetti L. Ecole Nationale d'Ingenieurs des Techniques des Industries Agricoles et Alimentaire. Ph.D. thesis dissertation, Nantes France, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tye H. Application of statistical ‘design of experiments’ methods in drug discovery. Drug Discov. 2004;9:485–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carmona MER, Da Silva MAP, Ferriera Leite SG. Biosorption of chromium using factorial experimental design. Process Biochem. 2005;40:779–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Debunne A, Vervaet C, Mangelings D, Remona JP. Compaction of enteric-coated pellets: influence of formulation and process parameters on tablet properties and in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22:305–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castellanos Gil E, Caraballo I, Bataille B. Tablet design. In: Cox Gad S, editor. Pharmaceutical manufacturing handbook: production and processes. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008. p. 977–1051.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Bilancetti
    • 1
  • Denis Poncelet
    • 1
  • Catherine Loisel
    • 1
  • Stefania Mazzitelli
    • 2
  • Claudio Nastruzzi
    • 2
  1. 1.ENITIAANantes Cedex 3France
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Technology of DrugsUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations