AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 416–424 | Cite as

Buccal Drug Delivery of Pravastatin Sodium

  • Supriya S. ShidhayeEmail author
  • Pritesh V. Thakkar
  • Neha M. Dand
  • Vilasrao J. Kadam
Research Article


The purpose of this study was to develop and optimize formulations of mucoadhesive bilayered buccal tablets of pravastatin sodium using carrageenan gum as the base matrix. The tablets were prepared by direct compression method. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) K 30, Pluronic® F 127, and magnesium oxide were used to improve tablet properties. Magnesium stearate, talc, and lactose were used to aid the compression of tablets. The tablets were found to have good appearance, uniform thickness, diameter, weight, pH, and drug content. A 23 full factorial design was employed to study the effect of independent variables viz. levels of carrageenan gum, Pluronic F 127 and PVP K30, which significantly influenced characteristics like in vitro mucoadhesive strength, in vitro drug release, swelling index, and in vitro residence time. The tablet was coated with an impermeable backing layer of ethyl cellulose to ensure unidirectional drug release. Different penetration enhancers were tried to improve the permeation of pravastatin sodium through buccal mucosa. Formulation containing 1% sodium lauryl sulfate showed good permeation of pravastatin sodium through mucosa. Histopathological studies revealed no buccal mucosal damage. It can be concluded that buccal route can be one of the alternatives available for the administration of pravastatin sodium.

Key words

bilayered buccal tablets carrageenan mucoadhesive pravastatin sodium 23 factorial design 


  1. 1.
    Smart JD. Drug delivery using buccal adhesive systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1993;11:253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossi S, Sandri G, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Buccal delivery of acyclovir from film based on chitosan and polyacrylic acid. Pharm Dev Tech. 2003;8(2):199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh B, Chakkal SK, Ahuja N. Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using surface response methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(1) Article 3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alur HS, Pather SI, Mitra AK, Johnston TP. Transmucosal sustained delivery of chlorpheniramine maleate in rabbits using a novel, natural mucoadhesive gum as an excipient in buccal tablets. Int J Phar. 1999;188:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Samaligy MS, Yahia SA, Basalious EB. Formulation and evaluaton of diclofenac sodium buccoadhesive discs. Int J Pharm. 2004;286:27–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon D, Schroeder M. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate-OTFC (ACTIQ ®).
  7. 7.
    Mashru S, Sutariya V, Sankalia M, Sankaliya J. Transbuccal delivery of lamotrigine across porcine buccal mucosa: in vitro determination of routes of buccal transport. J Pharm Pharmceut Sci. 2005;8(1):54–62.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abu-Huwaij R, Assaf S, Salem M, Sallam A. Potential mucoadhesive dosage form of lidocaine hydrochloride: II. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2007;33:437–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi H, Kim C. Development of omeprazole buccal adhesive tablets with stability enhancement in human saliva. J Control Rel. 2000;68:397–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munasur AP, Pillay V, Chetty DJ, Govender T. Statistical optimization of the mucoadhesivity and characterization of multipolymeric propranolol matrices for buccal therapy. Int J Pharm. 2006;323:43–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dollery CT, Boobis AR, Burley DM. Therapeutic drugs. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. P179–83.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyong LI, Nangia A, Dely A, Wong D. Stable pharmaceutical compositions containing pravastatin. WO Patent 03/000239, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Sci. 1998;1:15–30.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    JAJ Hoogstraate, Philip WW. Drug delivery via the buccal mucosa. PSTT. 1998;1(7):309–16.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piyakulawat P, Praphairaksit N, Chantarasiri N, Muangsin N. Preparation and evaluation of chitosan/carrageenan beads for controlled release of sodium diclofenac. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(4):Article 97.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanford B, Charles B. Pharmaceutical statistics. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Indian Pharmacopoeia. Controller of Publication, Delhi, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. India: Verghese Publishing House; 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bortunc B, Ozer L, Uyanik N. Development and in vitro evaluation of a buccoadhesive pindolol tablet formulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24(3):281–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parvez N, Ahuja A, Khar RK. Development and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of lignocaine hydrochloride. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(6):563–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choi HG, Jung JH, Yong CS, Rhee CD, Lee MK, Han JH, et al. Formulation and in vivo evaluation of omeprazole buccal adhesive tablet. J Control Rel. 2000;68:405–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jain AC, Aungst BJ, Adeyeye MC. Development and in vivo evaluation of buccal teblets prepared using danazol-sulfobutylether 7 beta-cyclodextrin (SBE 7) complexes. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91:1659–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel JK, Patel MM. Physicochemical characterization and evaluation of buccal adhesive patches containing propranolol hydrochloride. Current Drug Del. 2006;3:325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nafee NA, Ismail FA. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system, formulation and in-vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive tablets containing water soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30:995–04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lalla JK, Gurnaney RA, Narayan S. Permeation of Diclofenac through buccal mucosa. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(4):373–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Majithiya RJ, Ghosh PK, Umrethia ML, Murthy RSR. Thermoreversible mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of sumatriptan. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(3):Article 6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bodmeier R, Paeratakul O. Evaluation of drug-containing polymer films prepared from aqueous latexes. Pharm Res. 1989;6:725–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shidhaye SS, Saindane NS, Sutar S, Kadam VJ. Mucoadhesive bilayered patches for administration of sumatriptan succinate. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(3):909–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ruiz G, Ghaly E. Mucoadhesive delivery systems using carrageenan and Eudragit RLPO. Vitae. 2006;13(1):31–9.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Senel S, Hıncal AA. Drug permeation enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations. J Control Rel. 2001;72:133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supriya S. Shidhaye
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pritesh V. Thakkar
    • 1
  • Neha M. Dand
    • 1
  • Vilasrao J. Kadam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PharmaceuticsBharati Vidyapeeth’s College of PharmacyNavi MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations