AR-C155858 and AZD3965, pyrrole pyrimidine derivatives, represent potent monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) inhibitors, with potential immunomodulatory and chemotherapeutic properties. Currently, there is limited information on the inhibitory properties of this new class of MCT1 inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to characterize the concentration- and time-dependent inhibition of L-lactate transport and the membrane permeability properties of AR-C155858 and AZD3965 in the murine 4T1 breast tumor cells that express MCT1. Our results demonstrated time-dependent inhibition of L-lactate uptake by AR-C155858 and AZD3965 with maximal inhibition occurring after a 5-min pre-incubation period and prolonged inhibition. Following removal of AR-C155858 or AZD3965 from the incubation buffer, inhibition of L-lactate uptake was only fully reversed after 3 and 12 h, respectively, indicating that these inhibitors are slowly reversible. The uptake of AR-C155858 was concentration-dependent in 4T1 cells, whereas the uptake of AZD3965 exhibited no concentration dependence over the range of concentrations examined. The uptake kinetics of AR-C155858 was best fitted to a Michaelis-Menten equation with a diffusional clearance component, P (Km = 0.399 ± 0.067 μM, Vmax = 4.79 ± 0.58 pmol/mg/min, and P = 0.330 ± 0.088 μL/mg/min). AR-C155858 uptake, but not AZD3965 uptake, was significantly inhibited by alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, a known nonspecific inhibitor of MCTs 1, 2, and 4. AR-C155858 demonstrated a trend toward higher uptake at lower pH, a characteristic of proton-dependent MCT1. These findings provide evidence that AR-C155858 and AZD3965 exert slowly reversible inhibition of MCT1-mediated L-lactate uptake in 4T1 cells, with AR-C155858 representing a potential substrate of MCT1.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Participated in research design: X.G. and M.E.M.
Conducted experiments: X.G. and V.R.
Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: X.G. and M.E.M.
Performed data analysis: X.G. and M.E.M.
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: X.G. and M.E.M.
This work was funded by the National Institute of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant DA023223). X.G. was funded in part by an Allen Barnett Fellowship.
Morris ME, Felmlee MA. Overview of the proton-coupled MCT (SLC16A) family of transporters: characterization, function and role in the transport of the drug of abuse gamma-hydroxybutyric acid. AAPS J. 2008;10(2):311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halestrap AP, Meredith D. The SLC16 gene family-from monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) to aromatic amino acid transporters and beyond. Pflugers Archiv. 2004;447(5):619–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halestrap AP. The monocarboxylate transporter family--structure and functional characterization. IUBMB Life. 2012;64(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halestrap AP, Wilson MC. The monocarboxylate transporter family--role and regulation. IUBMB Life. 2012;64(2):109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein WN, Merezhinskaya N, Foellmer JW. Relative distribution of three major lactate transporters in frozen human tissues and their localization in unfixed skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26(1):101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel C, Halestrap AP. Lactate transport in skeletal muscle - role and regulation of the monocarboxylate transporter. J Physiol. 1999;517(Pt 3):633–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broer S, Broer A, Schneider HP, Stegen C, Halestrap AP, Deitmer JW. Characterization of the high-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT2 in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Biochem J. 1999;341(Pt 3):529–35.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Dimmer KS, Friedrich B, Lang F, Deitmer JW, Broer S. The low-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 is adapted to the export of lactate in highly glycolytic cells. Biochem J. 2000;350(Pt 1):219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning Fox JE, Meredith D, Halestrap AP. Characterisation of human monocarboxylate transporter 4 substantiates its role in lactic acid efflux from skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2000;529(Pt 2):285–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Baltazar F, Pinheiro C, Morais-Santos F, Azevedo-Silva J, Queiros O, Preto A, et al. Monocarboxylate transporters as targets and mediators in cancer therapy response. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(12):1511–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro C, Longatto-Filho A, Azevedo-Silva J, Casal M, Schmitt FC, Baltazar F. Role of monocarboxylate transporters in human cancers: state of the art. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2012;44(1):127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draoui N, Feron O. Lactate shuttles at a glance: from physiological paradigms to anti-cancer treatments. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(6):727–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy KM, Dewhirst MW. Tumor metabolism of lactate: the influence and therapeutic potential for MCT and CD147 regulation. Future Oncol. 2010;6(1):127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro C, Reis RM, Ricardo S, Longatto-Filho A, Schmitt F, Baltazar F. Expression of monocarboxylate transporters 1, 2, and 4 in human tumours and their association with CD147 and CD44. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:427694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro C, Sousa B, Albergaria A, Paredes J, Dufloth R, Vieira D, et al. GLUT1 and CAIX expression profiles in breast cancer correlate with adverse prognostic factors and MCT1 overexpression. Histol Histopathol. 2011;26(10):1279–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro C, Albergaria A, Paredes J, Sousa B, Dufloth R, Vieira D, et al. Monocarboxylate transporter 1 is up-regulated in basal-like breast carcinoma. Histopathology. 2010;56(7):860–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah MS, Davies AJ, Halestrap AP. The plasma membrane lactate transporter MCT4, but not MCT1, is up-regulated by hypoxia through a HIF-1alpha-dependent mechanism. The J Biol Chem 2006;281(14):9030–9037.Google Scholar
Rosafio K, Pellerin L. Oxygen tension controls the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 in cultured mouse cortical astrocytes via a hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-mediated transcriptional regulation. Glia. 2014;62(3):477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim KS, Lim KJ, Price AC, Orr BA, Eberhart CG, Bar EE. Inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter-4 depletes stem-like glioblastoma cells and inhibits HIF transcriptional response in a lactate-independent manner. Oncogene. 2014;33(35):4433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdan L, Arrar Z, Al Muataz Y, Suleiman L, Negrier C, Mulengi JK, et al. Alpha cyano-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e72953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble RA, Bell N, Blair H, Sikka A, Thomas H, Phillips N, et al. Inhibition of monocarboxyate transporter 1 by AZD3965 as a novel therapeutic approach for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Haematologica. 2017;102(7):1247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanski R, Hodgkinson CL, Fusi A, Nonaka D, Priest L, Kelly P, et al. Activity of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 inhibitor AZD3965 in small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(4):926–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bola BM, Chadwick AL, Michopoulos F, Blount KG, Telfer BA, Williams KJ, et al. Inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter-1 (MCT1) by AZD3965 enhances radiosensitivity by reducing lactate transport. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(12):2805–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais-Santos F, Granja S, Miranda-Goncalves V, Moreira AH, Queiros S, Vilaca JL, et al. Targeting lactate transport suppresses in vivo breast tumour growth. Oncotarget. 2015;6(22):19177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong SC, Nohr-Nielsen A, Zeeberg K, Reshkin SJ, Hoffmann EK, Novak I, et al. Monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT4 regulate migration and invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Pancreas. 2016;45(7):1036–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith D, Christian HC. The SLC16 monocaboxylate transporter family. Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems 2008;38(7–8):1072–106.Google Scholar
Guile SD, Bantick JR, Cheshire DR, Cooper ME, Davis AM, Donald DK, et al. Potent blockers of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT1: novel immunomodulatory compounds. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16(8):2260–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahlman C, Qi Z, Murray CM, Ferguson D, Bundick RV, Donald DK, et al. Immunosuppressive properties of a series of novel inhibitors of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT-1. Transpl Intern. 2013;26(1):22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno V, Binet I, Steger U, Bundick R, Ferguson D, Murray C, et al. The specific monocarboxylate transporter (MCT1) inhibitor, AR-C117977, a novel immunosuppressant, prolongs allograft survival in the mouse. Transplantation. 2007;84(9):1204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovens MJ, Davies AJ, Wilson MC, Murray CM, Halestrap AP. AR-C155858 is a potent inhibitor of monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2 that binds to an intracellular site involving transmembrane helices 7-10. Biochem J. 2010;425(3):523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovens MJ, Manoharan C, Wilson MC, Murray CM, Halestrap AP. The inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter 2 (MCT2) by AR-C155858 is modulated by the associated ancillary protein. Biochem J. 2010;431(2):217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izumi H, Takahashi M, Uramoto H, Nakayama Y, Oyama T, Wang KY, et al. Monocarboxylate transporters 1 and 4 are involved in the invasion activity of human lung cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(5):1007–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang H, Yang C, Doherty JR, Roush WR, Cleveland JL, Bannister TD. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of pteridine dione and trione monocarboxylate transporter 1 inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2014;57(17):7317–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijay N, Morse BL, Morris ME. A novel Monocarboxylate transporter inhibitor as a potential treatment strategy for gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid overdose. Pharm Res. 2015;32(6):1894–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halestrap AP, Price NT. The proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family: structure, function and regulation. Biochem J. 1999;343(Pt 2):281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan X, Bryniarski MA, Morris ME. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of the Monocarboxylate transporter 1 inhibitor AR-C155858 in the murine 4T1 breast Cancer tumor model. AAPS J. 2018;21(1):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancolas B, Sessions RB, Halestrap AP. Identification of key binding site residues of MCT1 for AR-C155858 reveals the molecular basis of its isoform selectivity. Biochem J. 2015;466(1):177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan X, Ruszaj D, Morris ME. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for AZD3965 in mouse plasma and tumor tissue: application to pharmacokinetic and breast tumor xenograft studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;155:270–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker WG, Sikic BI. Multidrug (pleiotropic) resistance in doxorubicin-selected variants of the human sarcoma cell line MES-SA. Cancer Res. 1985;45(9):4091–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Curtis NJ, Mooney L, Hopcroft L, Michopoulos F, Whalley N, Zhong H, et al. Pre-clinical pharmacology of AZD3965, a selective inhibitor of MCT1: DLBCL, NHL and Burkitt's lymphoma anti-tumor activity. Oncotarget. 2017;8(41):69219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarah ER, Halford PJ, Steve W, Hirschberg S, Katugampola S, Veal G, et al. A first-in-human first-in-class (FIC) trial of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) inhibitor AZD3965 in patients with advanced solid tumours. American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; Monday, June 5, 20172017.Google Scholar
Dienel GA. Brain lactate metabolism: the discoveries and the controversies. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(7):1107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colen CB, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Marples B, Galloway MP, Sloan AE, Mathupala SP. Metabolic remodeling of malignant gliomas for enhanced sensitization during radiotherapy: an in vitro study. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1313–23 discussion 23-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colen CB, Shen Y, Ghoddoussi F, Yu P, Francis TB, Koch BJ, et al. Metabolic targeting of lactate efflux by malignant glioma inhibits invasiveness and induces necrosis: an in vivo study. Neoplasia. 2011;13(7):620–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar