Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Oral Fludrocortisone and Intravenous Hydrocortisone in Healthy Volunteers
- 452 Downloads
This study aimed at describing the pharmacokinetics and the concentration-effect relationships of fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone on urinary sodium/potassium excretion in healthy volunteers. This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind, crossover study, of oral fludrocortisone and intravenous hydrocortisone, given alone or in combination, in 12 healthy male volunteers. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships on urinary sodium/potassium ratio for each drug. A one-compartment model was used to describe fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone pharmacokinetics. Mean plasma half-life was 1.40 h (95%CI [0.80;2.10]) for fludrocortisone and 2.10 h (95%CI [1.78;2.40]) for hydrocortisone. Clearance was 40.8 L/h (95%CI [33.6;48]) for fludrocortisone and 30 L/h (95%CI [25.3;34.7]) for hydrocortisone. An indirect response model was used to describe effects on urinary sodium/potassium ratio. Fludrocortisone plasma concentrations showed a wider inter-individual dispersion than hydrocortisone plasma concentrations. Urinary sodium/potassium ratio variability was also higher with fludrocortisone as compared to hydrocortisone. The plasma concentration of drug producing 50% of maximal inhibition of urinary sodium/potassium (IC50) was about 200 times lower for fludrocortisone (0.08 μg/L, 95%CI [0.035;0.125]) than for hydrocortisone (16.7 μg/L, 95%CI [10.5;22.9]). Simulations showed that a 4-time per day administration regimen allow to achieve steady fludrocortisone plasma concentrations with stable decrease in urinary sodium/potassium ratio after the second administration of fludrocortisone. Fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone have short and similar plasma elimination half-lives in healthy subjects. Fludrocortisone plasma concentrations and effect on urinary sodium/potassium ratio had a higher inter-individual variability as compared to hydrocortisone. The administration regimen of fludrocortisone should be reconsidered.
KEY WORDSfludrocortisone hydrocortisone modeling pharmacodynamics pharmacokinetics
The authors thank Nolwenn Boissel, Viviane Fortuna, and Cecile Reminiac (research nurses, Clinical Investigation Unit, Inserm CIC 1414 Clinical Investigation Centre) for technical assistance and Stuart Byrom for English editing. We also thank Pr Djillali Annane for his comments on the results.
- 9.Vogt W, Fischer I, Ebenroth S, Appel S, Knedel M, Lücker PW, et al. [Pharmacokinetics of 9 -fluorhydrocortisone]. Arzneimittelforschung. 1971;21(8):1133–43.Google Scholar
- 10.Ribot M, Polito A, Grassin-Delyle S, Annane D, Alvarez J-C. Human plasma quantification of fludrocortisone using liquid chromatography coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry after low-dosage administration. Clin Chim Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2013;420:109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chan PLS, Jacqmin P, Lavielle M, McFadyen L, Weatherley B. The use of the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX software for estimation of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-viral dynamics parameters of maraviroc in asymptomatic HIV subjects. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011;38(1):41–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Polito A, Hamitouche N, Ribot M, Polito A, Laviolle B, Bellissant E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral fludrocortisone in septic shock. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016.Google Scholar
- 26.Banda J, Lakshmanan R, Vvs SP, Gudla SP, Prudhivi R. A highly sensitive method for the quantification of fludrocortisone in human plasma using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and its pharmacokinetic application. Biomed Chromatogr BMC 2015Google Scholar