The AAPS Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 318–329 | Cite as

Identification of Two Novel, Potent, Low-Liability Antinociceptive Compounds from the Direct In Vivo Screening of a Large Mixture-Based Combinatorial Library

  • Kate J. Reilley
  • Marc Giulianotti
  • Colette T. Dooley
  • Adel Nefzi
  • Jay P. McLaughlin
  • Richard A. Houghten
Research Article Theme: Fishing for the Hidden Proteome in Health and Disease: Focus on Drug Abuse

Abstract

Synthetic combinatorial methods now make it practical to readily produce hundreds of thousands of individual compounds, but it is clearly impractical to screen each separately in vivo. We theorized that the direct in vivo testing of mixture-based combinatorial libraries during the discovery phase would enable the identification of novel individual compounds with desirable antinociceptive profiles while simultaneously eliminating many compounds with poor absorption, distribution, metabolism, or pharmacokinetic properties. The TPI 1346 small-molecule combinatorial library is grouped in 120 mixtures derived from 26 functionalities at the first three positions and 42 functionalities at the fourth position of a pyrrolidine bis-cyclic guanidine core scaffold, totaling 738,192 compounds. These 120 mixtures were screened in vivo using the mouse 55°C warm water tail-withdrawal assay to identify mixtures producing antinociception. From these data, two fully defined individual compounds (TPI 1818-101 and TPI 1818-109) were synthesized. These were examined for antinociceptive, respiratory, locomotor, and conditioned place preference effects. The tail-withdrawal assay consistently demonstrated distinctly active mixtures with analgesic activity that was blocked by pretreatment with the non-selective opioid antagonist, naloxone. Based on these results, synthesis and testing of TPI 1818-101 and 1818-109 demonstrated a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect three to five times greater than morphine that was antagonized by mu- or mu- and kappa-opioid receptor selective antagonists, respectively. Neither 1818-101 nor 1818-109 produced significant respiratory depression, hyperlocomotion, or conditioned place preference. Large, highly diverse mixture-based libraries can be screened directly in vivo to identify individual compounds, potentially accelerating the development of promising therapeutics.

Key words

analgesia in vivo mixture-based libraries opioid testing 

Abbreviations

BBB

Blood–brain barrier

CNS

Central nervous system

CPP

Conditioned place preference

DAMGO

[d-Ala2,(Me)Phe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin

DOR

Delta-opioid receptor

DPDPE

[d-Pen2,Phe4,d-Pen5]enkephalin

i.c.v.

Intracerebroventricular

i.p.

Intraperitoneal

KOR

Kappa-opioid receptor

MOR

Mu-opioid receptor

nor-BNI

Norbinaltorphimine

s.c.

Subcutaneous

U50,488

(±)-trans-3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide

U69,593

(+)-(5α,7α,8β)-N-Methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]-benzeneacetamide

References

  1. 1.
    Gutstein HB, Akil H. Opioid analgesics. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, editors. Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 569–619.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Houghten RA, Pinilla C, Appel JR, Blondelle SE, Dooley CT, Eichler J, Nefzi A, Ostresh JM. Mixture-based synthetic combinatorial libraries. J Med Chem. 1999;42:3743–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houghten RA, Pinilla C, Giulianotti MA, Appel JR, Dooley CT, Nefzi A, Ostresh JM, Yu Y, Maggiora GM, Medina-Franco JL, Brunner D, Schneider J. Strategies for the use of mixture-based synthetic combinatorial libraries: scaffold ranking, direct testing in vivo, and enhanced deconvolution by computational methods. J Comb Chem. 2008;10:3–19. doi: 10.1021/cc7001205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houghten RA, Pinilla C, Blondelle SE, Appel JR, Dooley CT, Cuervo JH. Generation and use of synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries for basic research and drug discovery. Nature 1991;354:84–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Houghten RA. Soluble combinatorial libraries: extending the range and repertoire of chemical diversity. Methods: A companion to methods in enzymology. 1994;6:354–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson LA, Ellman JA. Synthesis and applications of small molecular libraries. Chem Rev. 1996;96:555–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nefzi A, Ostresh JM, Houghten RA. The current status of heterocyclic combinatorial libraries. Chem Rev. 1997;97:440–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nefzi A, Ostresh JM, Yu Y, Houghten RA. Combinatorial chemistry: libraries from libraries, the art of the diversity-oriented transformation of resin-bound peptides and chiral polyamides to low molecular weight acyclic and heterocyclic compounds. J Org Chem. 2004;69:3603–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolle RE. Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 2004. J Comb Chem. 2005;7:739–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carroll FI, Houghten RA. From rapid in vitro screening to rapid in vivo screening in the drug discovery process. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009;34:251–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dooley CT, Chung NN, Schiller PW, Houghten RA. Acetalins: opioid receptor antagonists determined through the use of synthetic peptides combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10811–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinilla C, Appel JR, Blondelle SE, Dooley CT, Eichler J, Ostresh JM, Houghten RA. Versatility of positional scanning synthetic combinatorial libraries for the identification of individual compounds. Drug Dev Res. 1994;33:133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hensler ME, Bernstein G, Nizet V, Nefzi A. Pyrrolidine bis-cyclic guanidines with antimicrobial activity against drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens identified from a mixture-based combinatorial library. Bioorganic Medicinal Chem Lett. 2006;16:5073–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ostresh JM, Husar GM, Blondelle SE, Dörner B, Weber PA, Houghten RA. “Libraries from libraries”: chemical transformation of combinatorial libraries to extend the range and repertoire of chemical diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:11138–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McLaughlin JP, Marton-Popovici M, Chavkin C. Kappa opioid receptor antagonism and prodynorphin gene disruption block stress-induced behavioral responses. J Neurosci. 2003;23:5674–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szumlinski KK, Price KL, Frys KA, Middaugh LD. Unconditioned and conditioned factors contribute to the ‘reinstatement’ of cocaine place conditioning following extinction in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res. 2002;136:151–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLaughlin JP, Land BB, Li S, Pintar JE, Chavkin C. Prior activation of kappa opioid receptors by U50,488 mimics repeated forced swim stress to potentiate cocaine place preference conditioning. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006;31:787–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carey AN, Borozny K, Aldrich JV, McLaughlin JP. Reinstatement of cocaine place-conditioning prevented by the peptide kappa-opioid antagonist arodyn. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;569:84–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bardo MT, Rowlett JK, Harris MJ. Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehavioral Rev. 1995;19:39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orsini C, Bonito-Oliva A, Conversi D, Cabib S. Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57Bl/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;181:327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shook JE, Watkins WD, Camporesi EM. Differential roles of opioid receptors in respiration, respiratory disease, and opiate-induced respiratory depression. Am Rev Repir Dis. 1990;142:895–909.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burks TF, Fox DA, Hirning LD, Shook JE, Porreca F. Regulation of gastrointestinal function by multiple opioid receptors. Life Sci. 1988;43:2177–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yahya MD, Watson RR. Immunomodulation by morphine and marijuana. Life Sci. 1987;41:2503–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Way EL, Loh HH, Shen FH. Simultaneous quantitative assessment of morphine tolerance and physical dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969;167:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DeLander GE, Portoghese PS, Takemori AE. Role of spinal mu opioid receptors in the development of morphine tolerance and dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1984;231:91–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cowan A, Zhu XZ, Mosberg HI, Omnaas JR, Porreca F. Direct dependence studies in rats with agents selective for different types of opioid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;246:950–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    May CN, Dashwood MR, Whitehead CJ, Mathias CJ. Differential cardiovascular and respiratory responses to central administration of selective opioid agonists in conscious rabbits: correlation with receptor distribution. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;98:903–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Negus SS, Butelman ER, Chang K-J, DeCosta B, Winger G, Woods JH. Behavioral effects of the systemically active delta opioid agonist BW373U86 in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;270:1025–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leander JD. A kappa opioid effect: increased urination in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983;224:89–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pfeiffer A, Brantl V, Herz A, Emrich HM. Psychotomimesis mediated by kappa opiate receptors. Science 1986;233:774–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Houghten RA. General method for the rapid solid-phase synthesis of large numbers of peptides: specificity of antigen–antibody interaction at the level of individual amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:5131–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dooley CT, Houghten RA. The use of positional scanning synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries for the rapid determination of opioid receptor ligands. Life Sci. 1993;52:1509–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dooley CT, Ny P, Bidlack JM, Houghten RA. Selective ligands for the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors identified from a single tetrapeptide positional scanning combinatorial library. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18848–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dooley CT, Chung NN, Wilkes BC, Schiller PW, Bidlack JM, Pasternak GW, Houghten RA. An all D-amino acid opioid peptide with central analgesic activity from a combinatorial library. Science 1994;266:2019–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carlezon WA Jr, Béguin C, Knoll AT, Cohen BM. Kappa-opioid ligands in the study and treatment of mood disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;123:334–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paul D, Standifer KM, Inturrisi CE, Pasternak GW. Pharmacological characterization of morphine-6β-glucuronide, a very potent morphine metabolite. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989;251:477–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maldonado R, Valverde O. Participation of the opioid system in cannabinoid-induced antinociception and emotional-like responses. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;13:401–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quang PN, Schmidt BL. Endothelin-A receptor antagonism attenuates carcinoma-induced pain through opioids in mice. J Pain. 2010; PMID 20071245 (in press).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Unal CB, Owen MD, Millington WR. Beta-endorphin-induced cardiorespiratory depression is inhibited by glycyl-L-glutamine, a dipeptide derived from beta-endorphin processing. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;271:952–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith TW, Buchan P, Parsons DN, Wilkinson S. Peripheral antinociceptive effects of N-methyl morphine. Life Sci. 1982;31:1205–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oluyomi AO, Hart SL, Smith TW. Differential antinociceptive effects of morphine and methylmorphine in the formalin test. Pain 1992;49:415–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    DeHaven-Hudkins DL, Dolle RE. Peripherally restricted opioid agonists as novel analgesic agents. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:743–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate J. Reilley
    • 1
  • Marc Giulianotti
    • 1
  • Colette T. Dooley
    • 1
  • Adel Nefzi
    • 1
  • Jay P. McLaughlin
    • 1
  • Richard A. Houghten
    • 1
  1. 1.Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular StudiesPort St. LucieUSA

Personalised recommendations