Identification of Two Novel, Potent, Low-Liability Antinociceptive Compounds from the Direct In Vivo Screening of a Large Mixture-Based Combinatorial Library
- 235 Downloads
Synthetic combinatorial methods now make it practical to readily produce hundreds of thousands of individual compounds, but it is clearly impractical to screen each separately in vivo. We theorized that the direct in vivo testing of mixture-based combinatorial libraries during the discovery phase would enable the identification of novel individual compounds with desirable antinociceptive profiles while simultaneously eliminating many compounds with poor absorption, distribution, metabolism, or pharmacokinetic properties. The TPI 1346 small-molecule combinatorial library is grouped in 120 mixtures derived from 26 functionalities at the first three positions and 42 functionalities at the fourth position of a pyrrolidine bis-cyclic guanidine core scaffold, totaling 738,192 compounds. These 120 mixtures were screened in vivo using the mouse 55°C warm water tail-withdrawal assay to identify mixtures producing antinociception. From these data, two fully defined individual compounds (TPI 1818-101 and TPI 1818-109) were synthesized. These were examined for antinociceptive, respiratory, locomotor, and conditioned place preference effects. The tail-withdrawal assay consistently demonstrated distinctly active mixtures with analgesic activity that was blocked by pretreatment with the non-selective opioid antagonist, naloxone. Based on these results, synthesis and testing of TPI 1818-101 and 1818-109 demonstrated a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect three to five times greater than morphine that was antagonized by mu- or mu- and kappa-opioid receptor selective antagonists, respectively. Neither 1818-101 nor 1818-109 produced significant respiratory depression, hyperlocomotion, or conditioned place preference. Large, highly diverse mixture-based libraries can be screened directly in vivo to identify individual compounds, potentially accelerating the development of promising therapeutics.
Key wordsanalgesia in vivo mixture-based libraries opioid testing
Central nervous system
Conditioned place preference
This work was supported by NIDA grant R21 DA019620 (to RAH) and by the State of Florida, Executive Office of the Governor’s Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development.
- 1.Gutstein HB, Akil H. Opioid analgesics. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, editors. Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 569–619.Google Scholar
- 3.Houghten RA, Pinilla C, Giulianotti MA, Appel JR, Dooley CT, Nefzi A, Ostresh JM, Yu Y, Maggiora GM, Medina-Franco JL, Brunner D, Schneider J. Strategies for the use of mixture-based synthetic combinatorial libraries: scaffold ranking, direct testing in vivo, and enhanced deconvolution by computational methods. J Comb Chem. 2008;10:3–19. doi: 10.1021/cc7001205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Nefzi A, Ostresh JM, Yu Y, Houghten RA. Combinatorial chemistry: libraries from libraries, the art of the diversity-oriented transformation of resin-bound peptides and chiral polyamides to low molecular weight acyclic and heterocyclic compounds. J Org Chem. 2004;69:3603–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Shook JE, Watkins WD, Camporesi EM. Differential roles of opioid receptors in respiration, respiratory disease, and opiate-induced respiratory depression. Am Rev Repir Dis. 1990;142:895–909.Google Scholar
- 38.Quang PN, Schmidt BL. Endothelin-A receptor antagonism attenuates carcinoma-induced pain through opioids in mice. J Pain. 2010; PMID 20071245 (in press).Google Scholar