Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, 7:E89 | Cite as

Effect of formulation factors on in vitro permeation of moxifloxacin from aqueous drops through excised goat, sheep, and buffalo corneas

  • Pravin Kondiba Pawar
  • Dipak K. MajumdarEmail author
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of formulation factors on in vitro permeation of moxifloxacin from aqueous drop through freshly excised goat, sheep, and buffalo corneas. Aqueous isotonic ophthalmic solutions of moxifloxacin hydrochloride of different concentrations (pH 7.2) or 0.5% (wt/vol) solutions of different pH or 0.5% solutions (pH 7.2) containing different preservatives were made. Permeation characteristics of drug were evaluated by putting 1 mL formulation on freshly excised cornea (0.50 cm2) fixed between donor and receptor compartments of an all-glass modified Franz diffusion cell and measuring the drug permeated in the receptor (containing 10 mL bicarbonate ringer at 37°C under stirring) by spectrophotometry at 291 nm, after 120 minutes. Statistical analysis was done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test. Increase in drug concentration in the formulation resulted in an increase in the quantity permeated but a decrease in percentage permeation. Increase in pH of the solution from 5.5 to 7.2 increased drug permeation, indicating pH-dependent transport. Compared with control formulation, moxifloxacin 0.5% (wt/vol) solution (pH 7.2) containing disodium edetate (EDTA) (0.01% wt/vol) produced significantly (P<.05) higher permeation with all the corneas. Formulation with benzyl alcohol significantly (P<.05) increased permeation with buffalo cornea compared with its control. Presence of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) (0.01% wt/vol) and EDTA (0.01% wt/vol) in the formulation increased permeation to the maximum with all the corneas. The results suggest that moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution (pH 7.2) containing BAK (0.01%) and EDTA (0.01%) provides increased in vitro ocular availability through goat, sheep, and buffalo corneas.

Keywords

moxifloxacin concentration pH preservative cornea permeation 

References

  1. 1.
    Hardman JG, Limbird LE. Goodman & Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. The comparative antimicrobial activity of levofloxacin tested against 350 clinical isolates of Streptococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;25:47–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dalhoff A, Petersen U, Endermann R. In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone. Chemotherapy. 1996;42: 410–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis R, Bryson HM. Levofloxacin: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1994;47:677–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kowalski, RP, Dhaliwal DK, Karenchak LM, et al. Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin: an in vitro susceptibility comparison to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using bacterial keratitis isolates. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:500–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dajcs JJ, Thibodeaux BA, Marquart ME, Girgis DO, Traiedj M, O’Callaghan RJ. Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin or moxifloxacin for treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus keratitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1948–1952.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mather R, Stewart, JM, Tisha P, Wong J, Stephen DM. The effect of cataract surgery on ocular levels of topical moxifloxacin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:554–559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kowalski RP, Romanowski EG, Mah FS, Yates KA, Gordon YJ. Topical prophylaxis with moxifloxacin prevents endophthalmitis in a rabbit model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:33–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malhotra M, Majumdar DK. In vitro transcorneal permeation of ketorolac tromethamine from buffered and unbuffered aqueous ocular drops. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997;35:941–947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ling TL, Combs DL. Ocular bioavailability and tissue distribution [14C] ketorolac tromethamine in rabbits. J Pharm Sci. 1987;76:289–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sieg JW, Robinson JR. Mechanistic studies on transcorneal permeation of pilocarpine. J Pharm Sci. 1976;65:1816–1822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madhu C, Rix PJ, Shackleton MJ, Nguyen TG, Tang Liu DDS. Effect of benzalkonium, chloride/EDTA on the ocular bioavailability of ketorolac tromethamine following ocular instillations to normal and deepithelialized corneas of rabbits. J Pharm Sci. 1996;85: 415–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta M, Majumdar DK. Effect of concentration, pH and preservative on in vitro transcorneal permeation of ibuprofen and flurbiprofen from buffered and nonbuffered aqueous drops. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997;35:844–849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richman JB, Tang-Liu DD. A corneal perfusion device for estimating ocular bioavailability in vitro. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79:153–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maurice DM, Riley MV. Ocular Pharmacokinetics. In: Graymore CN, ed. Biochemistry of the Eye. London, UK: Academic Press; 1970:6–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rojanasakul Y, Robinson JR. Transport mechanisms of the cornea: characterization of barrier permselectivity. Int J Pharm. 1989;55:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawazu K, Midori Y, Shiono H, Ota A. Characterization of the carrier-mediated transport of levofloxacin, a fluoroquionolone antimicrobial agent, in rabbit cornea. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999;51:797–801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grass GM, Wood RW, Robinson JR. Effects of calcium chelating agents on corneal permeability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:110–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashton P, Diepold R, Platzer A, Lee VH. The effect of chlorhexidine acetate on the corneal penetration of sorbitol from an arnolol formulation in the albino rabbit. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1990;6:37–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rojanasakul Y, Liaw, J, Robinson JR. Mechanism of action of some penetration enhancers in the cornea: laser scanning confocal microscopic and electrophysiology studies. Int J Pharm. 1990;66:131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schoenwald RD, Huang HS. Corneal penetration behavior of beta-blocking agents. I. physicochemical factors. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72:1266–1272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hecht G, Roehrs RE, Cooper ER, Hiddeman JW, Van Duzee BF. Evaluation of Ophthalmic Pharmaceutical Products., In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT, eds. Modern, Pharmaceutics, Vol 40. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1990:539–603.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PharmaceuticsDelhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ResearchNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations