Skip to main content

The effect of marital status on survival in late-stage cancer patients: An analysis based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data, in the United States

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine volume 6, pages 150–176 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Recently findings that marital status is associated with survival in patients with late-stage prostate cancer led to an examination of the generalizability of this association for all cancers. We restricted the investigation to patients with late-stage cancer using population-based data collected from 261,070 patients with late-stage cancer at multiple sites in the United States to determine relations between marital status and survival. After controlling for age, race, and treatment, married patients with cancers of all major primary sites had significantly better survival than single, separated, divorced, or widowed patients. Although single and widowed patients had the poorest prognosis in general, single patients appeared to show the most consistently poor survival across the different types of cancers. Survival differences by marital status were more pronounced in men than in women. This observation raises the possibility that some characteristics associated with being married delay death from cancer. These findings require investigators to ask new questions about the effect of being married and its possible correlates, such as general health status, access to health care, and socioeconomic status. Known correlates of marital status, such as available social support and social isolation also merit attention in relation to these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance and mortality: A nine year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: a literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ell, K., Nishirnoto, R., Medeansky, L., Mantell, J., & Hamovitch, M. (1992). Social relations, social support and survival among patients with cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 531–541.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, I. J. (1990). Critical factors in the biology of human cancer metastasis: Twenty-eighth GHA Clowes memorial award lecture. Cancer Research, 50, 6130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, I. J., Gersten, D. M., & Hart, I. R. (1978). The biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Advances in Cancer Research, 28, 149.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, P. A., Lee, J. J., & Siau, J. (1990). Quality of life assessment: An independent prognostic variable for survival in lung cancer. Cancer, 67, 3131–3135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. S., Hunt, W. C., Key, C. R., & Samet, J. M. (1987). The effect of marital status on stage, treatment, and survival of cancer patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 3125–3130.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, marital status, and mental illness. Social Forces, 51, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. T. (1986). Generalized additive models. Stat Sci, 1, 97–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., & Rita, H. (1987). Mortality after bereavement: A prospective study of 96,647 widowed persons. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 283–287.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, I., Tominaga, S., & Ikari, A. (1992). The role of socioeconomic factors in survival of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 270–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krongrad, A., Lai, H., Burke, M. A., Goodkin, K., & Lai, S. (1996). Marriage and mortality in prostate cancer. Journal of Urolology, 156, 1696–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvikstad, A., Vatten, L. J., & Tretli, S. (1995). Widowed and divorce in relation to overall survival among middle-age Norwegian women with cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 71, 1343–1347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Last, J. M., Abramson, J. H., Friedman, G. D., Porta, M., Spasoff, R. A., & Thuriaux, M. (1995). A dictionary of epidemiology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. F. G., Goldblatt, P. O., & Mant, D. (1993). Marital stability and cancer of the uterine cervix: Changing patterns in post-war Britain. International Journal of Epidemiology, 22, 385–392.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayeri, K., Pitaro, G., & Feldman, J. G. (1992). Marital status and stage at diagnosis in cancer. New York State Journal of Medicine, 92, 8–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmeyer, C. F. (1974). Variables in mortality, morbidity, and health care by marital status. In L. L. Erhardt & J. E. Berlin (Eds.), Mortality and morbidity in the United States (pp. 159–184). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. L., Tong, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A.(1997). Cancer statistics, 1997. Ca: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 47, 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., Boyd, P. T., Blacklow, R. S., Jackson, J. S., Greenberg, R. S., & Austin, D. F. (1994). The relationship between social ties and survival among black and white breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 3, 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, L. A. G., Miller, B. A., Hankey, B. F, Koary, C. L., Harras, A., & Edwards, B. K.(Eds.). (1994). SEER cancer statistics review: 1973–1991. Tables and graphs. (National Institiute of Health Publication No. 94-2789). Bethesda, MD.

  • Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (1998). Modern epidemiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C., Quesenberry, C. P., & Wi, S. (1995). Mortality following conjugal bereavement and the effects of shared environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 1142–1152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, D., Kraemer, H. C., Bloom, J. R., & Gottheil, E. (1989). Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet, 2, 888–891.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugarbaker, E. V. (1979). Cancer metastasis: A product of tumor-host interactions. Current Problems in Cancer, 3, 1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. Principles of metastasis. (1985). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. A. The spread of tumors in the human body. (1972). London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. L., Percy, C. L., & Asire, A. J. (Eds.). (1981). Surveillance, epidemiology and end results: Incidence and mortality data, 1973-1977 (NIH Monograph 57). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, Dominion Tower, Room 1111A (D-93), PO Box 016960, 33101, Miami, FL

    Hong Lai, Edward Trapido & Clyde B. McCoy

  2. Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL

    Shenghan Lai & Arnon Krongrad

  3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL

    J. Bryan Page

Authors
  1. Hong Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shenghan Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arnon Krongrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward Trapido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Bryan Page
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Clyde B. McCoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, H., Lai, S., Krongrad, A. et al. The effect of marital status on survival in late-stage cancer patients: An analysis based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data, in the United States. Int. J. Behav. Med. 6, 150–176 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0602_4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0602_4

Key words

  • marital status
  • cancer
  • late stage
  • survival
  • SEER