Construct validation of health-relevant personality traits: Interpersonal circumplex and five-factor model analyses of the aggression questionnaire

Abstract

The general literature on personality traits as risk factors for physical illness—as well as the specific literature on health consequences of anger, hostility, and aggressive behavior— often suffers from incomplete or inconsistent construct validation of personality measures. This study illustrates the utility of two conceptual tools in this regard— the five-factor model and the interpersonal circumplex. The similarities and differences among anger, hostility, verbal aggressiveness, and physical aggressiveness as measured by the Buss and Perry (1992) Aggression Questionnaire were identi fied. Results support the interpretation of anger and hostility as primarily reflecting neurotic hostility and antagonistic hostility to a lesser extent. In contrast, verbal and physical aggressiveness can be seen as primarily reflecting antagonistic hostility, and to a lesser extent neurotic hostility. Further, verbal aggressiveness was associated with hostile dominance, whereas hostility was associated with hostile submissiveness. These findings identify potentially important distinctions among these related constructs and illustrate the potential integrative value of standard validation procedures.

Key words

anger hostility five-factor model circumplex aggressio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, N., & Matlhews, K. (19941). Health psychology: Why do some people gel sick and some slay healthy?Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barefoot, J. C. (1992). Developments in the measurement of hostility. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.),Hostility. coping, and healik (pp. 13–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barefoot, J. C., & Lipkus, I. M. (1994). The assessment of anger and hostility. In A. W. Siegman & T. W, Smith (Eds.).Anger, hostility, and the heart (pp. 43–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Blumenthal, J. A., Jiang, W., Babyak, M. A., Krantz, D. S., Frid, D. J., Coleman, R. E., Waugh, R., Hanson, M., Appelbaum, M., O’Connor, C., & Morris, J. J. (1997). Stress management and exercise training in cardiac patients with myocardial ischemia.Archives of Internal Medicine, 157. 2213–2223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booth-Kewley, S., & Vickers, R. R. (1994). Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior.Journal of Personality.62, 281–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushman, B. J., Cooper, H. M., & Lemke, K. M. (1991). Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.17, 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.63, 452–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition.American Psychologist.45, 735–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carson, R. C. (1969).Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Christensen, A. J., & Smith, T. W. (1993). Cynical hostility and cardiovascular reactivity during self-disclosure.Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 193–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Personality assessment in psychosomatic medicine. In T. M. Wise (Ed.),Advances in psychosomatic medicine (pp. 71–82). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.Google Scholar
  13. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dembroski, T. M. (1989). Agreeableness versus antagonism: Exolication of a potential risk factor for CHD. In A. W. Siegman & T. M. Dembroski (Eds.),In search of coronary- prone behavior: Beyond type A (pp. 41–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Dembroski, T. M., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Coronary prone behavior: Components of the type A pattern and hostility.Journal of Personality, 55, 211–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, H. S. Tucker, J. S., & Reise, S. P. (1995). Personality dimensions and measures potentially relevant to health: A focus on hostility.Annals of Behavioral Medicine.17, 245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Martin, L. R., Tomlinson-Keasy, C. Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1995), Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 696–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurtman, M. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circu mplex as a nomological net.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.63. 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gurtman, M. B. (1997). Studying personality traits: The circular way. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.).Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 81–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurtman, M. B., & Balakrishnan, J. D. (in press). Circular measurement redux: The analysts and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, J. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the aggression questionnaire.Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 991–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helmers, K. F., Poslitszny, D. M., & Krantz, D. S. (1994). Associations of hostility and coronary artery disease: A review of studies. In A. W. Siegman & T. W. Smith (Eds.),Anger, hostility and the heart (pp. 67–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstee, W. K. B., deRaad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.63, 146–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houston, B. K., Babyak, M. A., Chesney, M. A. & Black, G. (1997). Social dominance and 22-year all-cause mortality in men.Psychosomatic Medicine.59, 5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Houston, B. K., Chesney, M. A., Black, G. W., Cates, D. S., & Hecker, M. H. L. (1992). Behavioral clusters and coronary heart disease risk.Psychosomatic Medicine, 54, 447–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan, J. R., Bolchin, M. B., & Manuck, S. B. (1994). Animal models of aggression and cardiovascular disease. In A. W. Siegman & T. W. Smith (Eds.),Anger, hostility, and the heart (pp 127–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asociates. Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.Psychological Review.90, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiesler, D. J. (1991). Interpersonal methods of assessment and diagnosis. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.),Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 438–468) Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  28. Leary, T. (1957).Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Vickcrs, R. R., Kusulas, J. W., & Hervig, L. K. (1994), The Five-Factor Model as a framework for personality-health research,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 278–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person?Journal of Personality.63, 365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins circumplex and the five-factor model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.56. 586–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the fi ve factor model. I n J. S. Wiggins (Ed.).The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp, 51–87). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. McCrae, R. R.,& John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.Journal of Personality.60, 175–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, T. Q., Jenkins, C. D., Kaplan, G. A.. & Salonen, J. T. (1995) Are all hostility scales alike? Factor structure and covariation among measures of hostility.Journal of Applied Social Psychology.25, 1142–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L.,. & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health.Psychological Bulletin.119, 322–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamic, and invariance in personality structure.Psychological Review.102. 246–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., Dembraski, T. M., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Potential for hostility and dimensions of anger,Health Psychology, 8. 343–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saucier, G. (1992). Benchmarks: Integrating affective and interpersonal circles with the big-five- personality factors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1025–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheier, M. F..& Bridges, M. W. (1995). Person variables and health: Personality predispositions and acute psychological states as shared determinants for disease.Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 255–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegman, A. W. (1994). From Type A to hostility to anger: Reflections on the history of coronary-prone behavior. In A. W. Siegman & T. W, Smith (Eds.),Anger, hostility, and the heart (pp. 1–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Siegman, A. W., Demhroski, T. M., & Ringel, N. (1987). Components of hostility and the severity of coronary artery disease.Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 127–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis.Health Psychology.11. 139–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, T. W. (1994). Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health In A. W. Siegman & T. W. Smith (Eds.),Anger, hostility, and the heart (pp. 1–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, T. W., Allred, K. D., Morrison, C., & Carlson, S. (1989), Cardiovascular reactivity and interpersonal influence: Active coping in a social context.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56. 209–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, T. W., Baldwin, M., & Christensen, A. (1990). Interpersonal influence as active coping: Effects of task difficulty on cardiovascular reactivity.Psychophysiology, 27, 429–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, T. W., & Galto, L. G. (in press). Personality traits as risk factors for physical illness. In A. Baum. T. Revenson, & J. Siner (Eds.),Handbook nf health psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlhaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, T. W., Limon, J. P., Gallo, L. C., & Ngu, L. Q. (1996). Interpersonal control and cardiovascular reactivity: Goals, behavioral expression, and the moderating effects of sex.Journal of Personality and Social Psychoiogy.70, 1012–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, T. W., & Williams, P. G. (1992). Personality and health: Advantages and limitations of the five-factor model.Journal of Personality, 60, 395–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suarez, E. C., & Williams, R. B. (1990). The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardio- vascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics.Psychosomatic Medicine, 52, 558–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westen, D. (1995). A clinical-empirical model of personality: Life after the Mischelian ice age and the Neo-Lithic era.Journal of Personality, 63, 495–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whiteman, M. C., Deary, I. J., Lee, A. J., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (1997). Submissiveness and protection from coronary heart disease in the general population: Edinburgh Artery Study.Lancet.350, 541–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales,European Journal of Personality, 5. 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.),The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–167). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  56. Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R).Multivariate Behavioral Research.23, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Behavioral Sciences BuildingThe University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations