Skip to main content
Log in

A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: Development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Recent literature has indicated that a significant percentage of oncology patients describe finding some benefit (e.g., improved personal growth, sense of meaning, and enhanced interpersonal relationships) in the cancer experience. However, few studies have investigated the role of group-based psychosocial interventions in improving benefit finding (BF), and virtually none have investigated these constructs in men.Purpose: This study examined whether a cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) intervention improves BF and quality of life (QoL) in men recovering from treatment for localized prostate cancer.Methods: Participants in this study were 191 men (M age = 65.1) treated with radiation or radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (i.e., Stage I or II) prostate cancer. Participants were primarily non-Hispanic White (40%) or Hispanic (41 %), followed by Black (18%) and other ethnicity (1 %), were an average of 65.1 years old (SD = 7.7), and earned an average of $47,800 annually (SD = $41,000). Participants were randomized to either a 10-week group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention or a half-day educational seminar as a control condition. All participants provided demographic information and completed the Positive Contributions Scale-Cancer to assess BF, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy to measure quality of life, and a measure of perceived stress management skills. Structural equation modeling was utilized for all analyses.Results: Results indicated that the CBSM condition led to increases in BF and QoL and that these changes were mediated by the development of stress management skills.Conclusions: Results support the use of group-based cognitive-behavioral interventions in promoting QoL and BF in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society:Cancer Facts & Figures 2004. Atlanta, GA: Author, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tewari A, Johnson C, Divine G, et al.: Long-term survival probability in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: A case-control, propensity modeling study stratified by race, age, treatment and comorbidities.Journal of Urology. 2004,171:1513–1519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Post P, Kil P Hendrikx A, et al.: Comorbidity in patients with prostate cancer and its relevance to treatment choice.British Journal of Urology International. 1999,84:652–656.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schapira M, Lawrence W, Katz D, et al.: Effect of treatment on quality of life among men with clinically localized prostate cancer.Medical Care. 2001,39:243–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh P Partin A, Epstein J: Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical retropubic prostatectomy: Results at 10 years.Journal of Urology. 1994,152:1831–1836.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Debruyne F, Beerlage H: The place of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early localized prostate cancer.Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2000,57:259–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eton DT, Lepore SJ: Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: A review of the literature.Psycho-Oncology. 2002,11:307–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Penson D, Litwin M, Aaronson N: Health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.Journal of Urology. 2003,169:1643–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford J, Feng Z, Hamilton A, et al.: Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002,83:354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schover L, Fouladi R, Warneke, C, et al.: Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma.Cancer. 2002,95:1773–1785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Penson D, Feng Z, Kuniyuki A, et al.: General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: What influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcome study.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003,21:1147–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bacon C, Giovannucci E, Testa M, et al.: The association of treatment-related symptoms with quality-of-life outcomes for localized prostate carcinoma patients.Cancer. 2002,94:862–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark J, Inui T, Silliman R, et al.: Patient's perceptions of quality of life after treatment for early prostate cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003,21:3777–3784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kornblith, A, Herr H, Ofman U, et al.: Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care.Cancer. 1994,73:2791–2802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark J, Talcott J: Symptom indexes to assess outcomes of treatment for early prostate cancer.Medical Care. 2001,39:1118–1130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thornton A, Perez M, Meyerowitz B: Patient and partner quality of life and psychosocial adjustment following radical prostatectomy.Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2004,11:15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manne S, Babb J, Pinover W, et al.: Psychoeducational group intervention for wives of men with prostate cancer.Psycho-Oncology. 2004,13:37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, et al.: Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: Survey from a non-surgical oncology clinic.Psycho-Oncology. 2003,12:769–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steginga S, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, et al.: The supportive care needs of men withprostatecancer.Psycho-Oncology. 2001,10:66–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pirl W, Siegel G, Goode M, Smith M: Depression in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: A pilot study.Psycho-Oncology. 2002,11:518–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritterband L, Spielberger C: Depression in a cancer patient population.Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2001,8:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, et al.: The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.Psycho-Oncology. 2001,10:19–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomich P, Helgeson V: Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2004,23:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Katz R, Flasher L, Cacciapaglia H, Nelson S: The psychosocial impact of cancer and lupus: A cross validation study that extend the generality of “benefit finding” in patients with chronic disease.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,24:561–571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins R, Taylor S, Skokan L: A better world or a shattered vision? Changes in life perspective following victimization.Social Cognition. 1990,8:263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Antoni M, Lehman J, Kilbourn K, et al.: Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2001,20:20–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cordova M, Cunningham L, Carlson C, Andrykowski M: Post-traumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study.Health Psychology. 2001,20:176–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sears S, Stanton A, Danoff-Burg S: The yellow brick road and the emerald city: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2003,22:487–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tomich P, Helgeson V: Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women.Psycho-Oncology. 2002,11:154–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carver C, Antoni M: Finding benefit in breast cancer during the year after diagnosis predicts better adjustment 5 to 8 years after diagnosis.Health Psychology (in press, 2005).

  31. Cruess D, Antoni M, McGregor BA, et al.: Cognitive-behavioral stress management reduces serum cortisol by enhancing benefit finding among women being treated for early stage breast cancer.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2000,62:304–308.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cruess D, Antoni M, Kumar M, et al.: Effects of stress management on testosterone levels in women with early-stage breast cancer.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,8:194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tedeschi R, Calhoun C: Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.Psychological Inquiry. 2004,15:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Calhoun L, Tedeschi R: Posttraumatic growth: Future directions. In Tedeschi RG, Park CL, Calhoun LG (eds),Posttraumatic Growth: Positive Change in the Aftermath of Crisis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1998, 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lechner S, Antoni M: Posttraumatic growth and group-based interventions for persons dealing with cancer: What have we learned so far?Psychological Inquiry. 2004,15:35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tedeschi R, Calhoun L: The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma.Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1996,9:455–471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lepore S, Helgeson V, Eton D, Schulz R: Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A randomized controlled trial of group education interventions.Health Psychology. 2003,22:443–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rehse B, Pukrop R: Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: Meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies.Patient Education and Counseling. 2003,50:179–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Graves K: Social cognitive theory and cancer patient's quality of life: A meta-analysis of psychosocial intervention components.Health Psychology. 2003,22:210–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Quesnel C, Savard J, Simard S, et al.: Efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in women treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2003,71:189–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fawzy F, Fawzy N: Group therapy in the cancer setting.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1998,45:191–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohr D, Dick L, Russo D, et al.: The psychosocial impact of multiple sclerosis: Exploring the patient’s perspective.Health Psychology. 1999,18:376–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fromm K, Andrykowski M, Hunt J: Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: Implications for quality of life assessment.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1996,19:221–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson S: Finding positive meaning in a stressful event and coping.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1985,6:279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McMillen J, Smith E, Fisher R: Perceived benefits and mental health after three types of disaster.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1997,67:733–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lechner S, Zakowski S, Antoni M, et al.: Do sociodemographic and disease-related variables influence benefit-finding in cancer patients?Psycho-Oncology. 2003,12:491–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Penedo F, Dahn J, Molton I, et al.: Cognitive behavioral stress management improves stressmanagement skills and quality of life in men recovering from treatment of prostate carcinoma.Cancer. 2004,100:192–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P: “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatry Research. 1975,12:189–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. First M, Spitzer M, Gibbon M, Williams J:Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR, Antoni MH:Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) Intervention for Prostate Cancer. Unpublished manual. University of Miami, Department of Psychology: 2001.

  51. Antoni MH, Baggett L, Ironson G, et al.: Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention buffers distress responses and immunologic changes following notification of HIV-1 sero-positivity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991,59:906–915.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Antoni M:Stress Management Intervention for Women with Breast Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, Mackenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation.Journal of Chronic Disease. 1987,40:373–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Carver C:Measure of Current Status. Unpublished instrument. University of Miami: 2001.

  55. Penedo F, Dahn J, Gonzalez J, et al.: Perceived stress management skill mediates the relationship between optimism and positive mood following radical prostatectomy.Health Psychology. 2003,22:220–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cella D, Tulsky D, Gray G, et al.: The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1993,11:570–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wei J, Dunn R, Litwin M, Sandler HM, Sanda, MG: Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.Urology. 2000,56:899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Shrader-Bogen C, Kjellberg J, McPherson C, Murray C: Quality of life and treatment outcomes.Cancer. 1997,79:1977–1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee W, Hall M, McQuellon R, Case LD, McCullough DL: A prospective quality-of-life study in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or interstitial brachytherapy.International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2001,51:614–623.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Behr S, Murphy D, Summers J:Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  61. McGregor B, Antoni M, Boyers A, et al.: Cognitive-behavioral stress management increases benefit finding and immune function among women with early-stage breast cancer.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2004,57:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bentler P, Weeks D: Linear structural equations with latent variables.Psychometrika. 1980,45:289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Multivariate Software, Inc:EQS. Version 6.0. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc., 2003.

  64. Bollen K:Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Janoff-Bulman R:Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Janoff-Bulman R: Posttraumatic growth: Three explanatory models.Psychological Inquiry. 2004,15:30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mandalinska J, Essink-Bot M, de Koning H, et al.: (2001). Health-related quality of life in patients with screen-detected versus clinical diagnosed prostate cancer preceding primary treatment.Prostate. 2001,46:87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bacon C, Givannucci E, Testa M, Kawachi I: The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer.Journal of Urology. 2001,166:1804–1810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Benight CC, Flores J, Tashiro T: Bereavement coping self-efficacy in cancer widows.Death Studies. 2001,25:97–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Lin C: Comparison of the effects of perceived self-efficacy on coping with chronic pain and coping with chronic low back pain.Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998,14:303–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Park C, Cohen L., Murch R: Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth.Journal of Personality. 1996,64:71–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank J. Penedo Ph.D..

Additional information

This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant 1P50CA84944.

About this article

Cite this article

Penedo, F.J., Molton, I., Dahn, J.R. et al. A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: Development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding. ann. behav. med. 31, 261–270 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8

Keywords

Navigation