A preliminary test of a student-centered intervention on increasing physical activity in underserved adolescents

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that choice and self-initiated behavior change are important for increasing intrinsic motivation and physical activity (PA), however, little of this research has focused on underserved adolescents.Purpose: This study examined the effects of a 4-week student-centered intervention on increasing PA in underserved adolescents.Methods: Twenty-eight students in the intervention school were matched (on race, percentage on free or reduced-price lunch program, gender, and age) with 20 students from another school who served as the comparison group (30 girls, 18 boys; ages 10–12 years; 83% African American; 83% on free or reduced-price lunch). The student-centered intervention was consistent with self-determination (motivation) theory and social cognitive theory in that it emphasized increasing intrinsic motivation and behavioral skills for PA. Intervention adolescents took ownership in selecting a variety of PA activities in which to participate, and they generated coping strategies for making effective PA behavior changes.Results: Intervention participants showed greater increases in accelerometer estimates of time spent in moderate PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA, and vigorous PA from baseline to Week 4 of the intervention than the comparison group. Intervention participants also showed greater increases in PA motivation and positive self-concept for PA than comparison adolescents.Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that increasing adolescent involvement and choice of activities may be important in developing future PA interventions for underserved adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. (1)

    Taylor WC, Sallis JF: Determinants of physical activity in children. In Simopoulos AP, Pavlou KN (eds),Nutrition and Fitness: Metabolic and Behavioral Aspects in Health and Disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. (2)

    Sallis JF, Zakarian JM, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences in physical activity among adolescents.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996,49:125–134.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. (3)

    Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, et al.: Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth.Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 1999,153:409–418.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. (4)

    Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp KI: Community wide youth exercise promotion: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study.Journal of School Health. 1993,63:218–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. (5)

    Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better?American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:266–297.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. (6)

    Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. (7)

    Ryan DM, Deci EL: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist. 2000,55:68–78.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. (8)

    Ferrer-Caja E, Weiss MR: Predictors of intrinsic motivation among adolescent students in physical education.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71:267–279.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. (9)

    Thompson CE, Wankel LM: The effect of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1980,10:436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. (10)

    Wilson DK, Williams J, Evans AE, et al.: Gender differences in preferences and motivational factors in underserved adolescents.Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2005,30:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. (11)

    Eitel P, Friend R: Reducing denial of STD and HIV risk in college students: A comparison of a cognitive and motivational approach.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:12–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. (12)

    Wilson DK, Friend R, Teasley N, et al.: Motivational versus social cognitive interventions for promoting fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity in African American adolescents.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002,24:310–319.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. (13)

    Lewin K: Group decision and social change. In Maccoby EE, Newcomb TM, Hartley EL (eds),Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  14. (14)

    Schlenker BR, Dlugolecki DW, Doherty K: The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behavior: The power of public commitment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,66:20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (15)

    Festinger L:A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  16. (16)

    Brehm JW, Cohen AR:Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  17. (17)

    Bem DJ: Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz L (ed),Advances in Experimental SocialPsychology. NewYork:Academic, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. (18)

    Rhodewalt F: Self-presentation and the phenomenal self: The “carryover effect” revisited. In Cooper J, Darley JM (eds),Attributional Processes, Person Perception, and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998, 373–421.

    Google Scholar 

  19. (19)

    Stone E, McKenzie TL, Welk GJ, Booth ML: Effects of physical activity interventions in youth: Review and synthesis.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:298–315.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. (20)

    Sallis JF, Patrick K: Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: Consensus statement.Pediatric Exercise Science. 1994,6:302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  21. (21)

    Freedson PS, Sirard J, Debold E, et al.: Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications Inc. (CSA) accelerometer.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1997, 29(Suppl.):S45.

    Google Scholar 

  22. (22)

    Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead PD, et al.: Validity of the Computer Science and Applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998,30:629–633.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. (23)

    Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J: Calibration of Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998,30:777–781.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. (24)

    Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, Patterson TL, Nader PR: The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors.Health Education Research. 1988,3:283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. (25)

    Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KJ: Physical activity enjoyment scale: Two validation studies.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1991,13:50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  26. (26)

    Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, et al.: Compliance with physical activity guidelines: Prevalence in a population of children and youth.Annals of Epidemiology. 2002,12:303–308.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. (27)

    Stone EJ, Osganian SK, McKinlay SM, et al.: Operational design and quality control in the CATCH Multicenter Trial.Preventive Medicine. 1996,25:384–399.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. (28)

    Edmundson E, Parcel GS, Feldman HA, et al.: The effects of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health upon psychosocial determinants of diet and physical activity behavior.Preventive Medicine. 1996,25:442–454.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. (29)

    Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, et al.: Outcomes of a field trial to improve children’s dietary patterns and physical activity: Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH).Journal of American Medical Association. 1996,257:768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. (30)

    Trost SG, Pate RR, Ward DS, et al.: Determinants of physical activity in active and low-active, sixth grade African-American youth.Journal of School Health. 1999,69:29–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn K. Wilson Ph.D..

Additional information

This project was funded by a Research and Productive Scholarship Grant to Dawn Wilson from the University of South Carolina and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement U48/CCU409664-06. We acknowledge Cherie Minette for her assistance with conducting this project.

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D.K., Evans, A.E., Williams, J. et al. A preliminary test of a student-centered intervention on increasing physical activity in underserved adolescents. ann. behav. med. 30, 119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3002_4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intrinsic Motivation
  • Behavioral Medicine
  • Social Cognitive Theory
  • Positive Coping Strategy
  • Generate Coping Strategy