Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary on Schroder et al. (2003a, 2003b)

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schroder KEE, Carey MP, Vanable PA: Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: I. Item content, scaling, and data analytical options.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003a,26:76–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schroder KEE, Carey MP, Vanable PA: Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003b,26:104–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loftus EF, Klinger MR, Smith KD, Fiedler J: A tale of two questions: Benefits of asking more than one question.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1990,54:330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Catania JA, Binson D, Canchola JA, et al.: Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996,60:345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catania JA, Binson D, Peterson J, Canchola J: The effects of question wording, interviewer gender, and control on item response by African American respondents. In Bancroft J (ed),Researching Sexual Behavior: Methodological Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997, 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McElrath K, Chitwood DD, Connerford M: The consistency of self-reported HIV risk behavior among injection drug users.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:1965–1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, et al.: Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology.Science. 1998,280:867–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Pre-paredness Study Protocol Team.American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000,152:99–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tourangeau R, Rasinski K, Jobe JB, Pratt WF: Sources of error in a survey on sexual behavior.Journal of Official Statistics. 1997,13:341–365.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, et al.: A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing.AIDS Education and Prevention. 2000,12:199–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones R, Jedrasik E: Using audio computer-assisted self-interview in AIDS risk research.Connect: Information Technology at NYU. 2000.

  12. Jobe JB, Pratt WF, Tourangeau R, Baldwin AK, Rasinski KA: Effects of interview mode on sensitive questions in a fertility survey. In Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, et al. (eds),Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, 1997, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen R, Catania JA, Althof A, et al.:Ejaculatory dysfunction: Development and psychometric validation of a new assessment Scale. Poster session presented at American Urology Association (AUA) Annual Meeting. Chicago: 2003.

  14. Biemer P: Nonresponse bias and measurement bias in a comparison of face to face and telephone interviewing.Journal of Official Statistics. 2001,17:295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jewell NP, Shiboski S: Statistical analysis of HIV infectivity based on partner studies.Biometrics. 1990,46:1133–1150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moss AR, Osmond D, Bacchetti P, et al.: Risk factors for AIDS and HIV seropositivity in homosexual men.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987,125:1035–1047.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Winkelstein W, Lyman DM, Padian N, et al.: Sexual practices and risk of infection by the human immunodeficiency virus: The San Francisco Men’s Health Study.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987,257:321–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kingsley LA, Detels R, Kaslow R, et al.: Risk factors for seroconversion to human immunodeficiency virus among male homosexuals.Lancet. 1987,1:345–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Searle S:Linear Models for Unbalanced Data. New York: Wiley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bock RD: Conditional and unconditional inference in the analysis of repeated measurements.Symposium on the Application of Statistical Techniques to Psychological Research. 1969.

  21. Jennings E: Models for pretest-posttest data: Repeated measures ANOVA revisited.Journal of Educational Statistics. 1988,13:273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward JH, Jennings E:Introduction to Linear Models. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens J:Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duan N: Smearing estimate: A non-parametric retransformation method.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1983,78:605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCullagh P, Nelder J:Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dobson AJ:An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Collett D:Modeling Binary Data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cox DR, Snell EJ:The Analysis of Binary Data (2nd Ed.). London: Chapman & Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK: Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests.Journal of Applied Econometrics. 1986,1:29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lambert D: Zero-inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing.Technometrics. 1992,34:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Long JS, Friese J:Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Data Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Diggle PJ, Heagarty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL:Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL: Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.Biometrika. 1986,73:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldstein H:Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Arnold Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW:Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Neuhaus JM: Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses.Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1992,1:249–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD, Hauck WW: A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data.International Statistical Review. 1991,59:25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD:SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rubin DB: Inference and missing data (with discussion).Biometrika. 1976,63:581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Little JWA, Rubin DA:Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD: Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies.Psychological Methods. 1997,2:64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heitjan DF: Annotation: What can be done about missing data? Approaches to imputation.American Journal of Public Health. 1997,87:548–550.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Allison P:Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rubin DB:Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schafer JL:Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Catania JA, Gibson D, Marin B, Coates TJ, Greenblatt R: Response bias in assessing sexual behaviors relevant to HIV transmission.Evaluation and Program Planning. 1990,13:19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gribble JN, Miller HG, Cooley PC, et al.: The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men.Substnce Use and Misuse. 2000,35:869–890.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Woodward JA, Bonnett DG, Brecht M-L:Introduction to Linear Models and Experimental Design. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Feinberg SE:The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data (2nd Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Horton NJ, Lipsitz SR: Review of software to fit generalized estimating equation models.The American Statistician. 1999,53:160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Allison P:Logistic Regression Using the SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brant R: Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds modelfor ordinal logistic regression.Biometrics. 1990,46:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Peterson B, Harrell Jr. F: Partial proportional odds models for ordinal responsevariables.Applied Statistics. 1990,39:205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huberty C, Morris JD: Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses.Psychological Bulletin. 1989,105:302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang M, Goldstein H, Heath A: Multilevel models for repeated binary outcomes: Attitudes and voting over the electoral cycle.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A — Statistics in Society. 2000,163:49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Muthen BO, Curran PJ: General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation.Psychological Methods. 1997,2:371–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wothke W: Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In Little TD, Schnabel KU, Baumert J (eds),Modeling Longitudinal and Multilevel Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000, 219–240, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catania Joseph A. Ph.D..

Additional information

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Mental Health Grant 1 R01 MG54320-06A1, and State Office of AIDS Grant 01-16085, awarded to Dr. Joseph Catania, and NIH/NIMH Centers Grant P50MH42459-14.

About this article

Cite this article

Catania, J.A., Osmond, D., Neilands, T.B. et al. Commentary on Schroder et al. (2003a, 2003b). ann. behav. med. 29, 86–95 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902_2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902_2

Keywords

Navigation