Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Job characteristics, occupational status, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity in women

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Prior research concerning the effects of occupational status and work stress on ambulatory blood pressure (AmBP) has seldom included women, and available results are equivocal. Moreover, the concurrent effects of occupational status and job characteristics have rarely been investigated. Some research is consistent with the idea that stressful job characteristics are especially detrimental to health in low-status workers, creating a cumulative physiological burden.Purpose: To examine the independent and joint effects of occupational status and perceived demands, control, and social support at work on AmBP and heart rate (HR) in women.Methods: One hundred eight women (M age = 41.07 years) wore an AmBP monitor for 2 days and completed a self-report assessment of job control, demands, and support (i.e., Karesek et al.’s Job Content Questionnaire).Results: After controlling for numerous potential confounds, occupational status and job characteristics accounted for 18% and 22% of the inter-individual variability in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR, respectively. Occupational status independently predicted ambulatory cardiovascular activity and interacted with job characteristics, particularly in relation to SBP.Conclusions: Inasmuch as ambulatory SBP and HR predict future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, women with both lower status occupations and stressful job circumstances could be at disproportionately high cardiovascular risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karasek R: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979,24:285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karasek R, Theorell T:Healthy Work, Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J, Marmot M: Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.American Journal of Public Health. 1998,88:68–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammar N, Alfredsson L, Johnson JV: Job strain, social support at work, and incidence of myocardial infarction.Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1998,55:548–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson JV, Hall EM, Theorell T: Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a random sample of the Swedish male working population.Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 1989,15:271–279.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marmot MG, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S: Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence.The Lancet. 1997,350:235–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wamala SP, Mittleman MA, Horsten M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomér K: Job stress and the occupational gradient in coronary heart disease risk in women: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study.Social Science & Medicine. 2000,51:481–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Baker D: Job strain and cardiovascular disease.Annual Review of Public Health. 1994,15:381–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuper H, Marmot M: Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003,57:147–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson JV, Hall EM: Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross- sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working populations.American Journal of Public Health. 1988,78:1336–1342.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson JV, Stewart W, Hall EM, Fredlund P, Theorell T: Long term psychosocial work environment and cardiovascular mortality among Swedish men.American Journal of Public Health. 1996,86:324–331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmot M, Theorell T, Siegrist J: Work and coronary heart disease. In Stansfeld SA (ed),Stress and the Heart: Psychosocial Pathways to Coronary Heart Disease. London: BMJ Books, 2002, 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hemingway H, Marmot M: Evidence based cardiology: Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: Systematic review of prospective cohort studies.British Medical Journal. 1999,318:1460–1467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Belkic K, Landsbergis PA, Schnall P, et al.: Psychosocial factors: Review of the empirical data among men. In Schnall P, Belkic K, Landsbergis PA, Baker D (eds),The Workplace and Cardiovascular Disease. Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus, 2000, 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Light KC, Turner JR, Hinderliter AL: Job strain and ambulatory work blood pressure in healthy young men and women.Hypertension. 1992,20:214–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG: Relation between job strain, alcohol, and ambulatory blood pressure.Hypertension. 1992,19:488–494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG: A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: Results from a three-year follow-up.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1998,60:697–706.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steptoe A, Cropley M, Griffith J, Joekes K: The influence of abdominal obesity and chronic work stress on ambulatory blood pressure in men and women.International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 1999,23:1184–1191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumenthal JA, Thyrum ET, Siegel WC: Contribution of job strain, job status and marital status to laboratory and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1995,39:133–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Laflamme N, Brisson C, Moisan J, et al.: Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure among female white-collar workers.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 1998,24:334–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buring JE, Evans DA, Fiore M, Rosner B, Hennekens CH: Occupation and risk of death from coronary heart disease.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987,258:791–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallo LC, Troxel W, Matthews KA, et al.: Occupation and subclinical cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women: Are clerical workers at greater risk?Health Psychology. 2003,22:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G: Inequalities in death—specific explanations of a general pattern?The Lancet. 1984,1:1003–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosengren A, Wedel H, Wilhelmsen L: Coronary heart disease and mortality in middle aged men from different occupational classes in Sweden.British Medical Journal. 1988,297:1497–1500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haynes SG, Feinleib M: Women, work and coronary heart disease: Prospective findings from the Framingham Heart Study.American Journal of Public Health. 1980,70:133–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. House JS, Strecher V, Metzner HL, Robbins CA: Occupational stress and health among men and women in the Tecumseh Community Health Study.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1986,27:62–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Light KC, Brownley KA, Turner JR, et al.: Job status and high-effort coping influencework blood pressure in women and Blacks.Hypertension. 1995,25:554–559.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Matthews KA, Raikkonen K, Everson SA, et al.: Do the daily experiences of healthy men and women vary according to occupational prestige and work strain?Psychosomatic Medicine. 2000,62:346–353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steptoe A, Kuntz-Ebrecht S, Owen N, et al.: Socioeconomic status and stress-related biological responses over the working day.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marmot M, Theorell T: Social class and cardiovascular disease: The contribution of work.International Journal of Health Services. 1988,18:659–674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stansfeld SA, Head J, Marmot MG: Explaining social class differences in depression and well- being.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1998,33:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F, Theorell T, Reuterwall C, Ahlbom A: Is the effect of job strain on myocardial infarction due to interaction between high psychological demands and low decision latitude? Results from Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP).Social Science and Medicine. 1998,46:1405–1415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steenland K, Johnson J, Nowlin S: A follow-up study of job strain and heart disease among males in the NHANES1 population.American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1997,31:256–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Pickering TG, Warren K, Schwartz JE: Lower socioeconomic status among men in relation to the association between job strain and blood pressure.Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 2003,29:206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Alterman T, Shekelle RB, Vernon SW, Burau KD: Decision latitude, psychological demand, job strain, and coronary heart disease in the Western Electric Study.American Journal of Epidemiolgy. 1994,139:620–627.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Duncan OD:Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami H, et al.: The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1998,3:322–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kamarck TW, Shiffman SM, Smithline L, et al.: Effects of task strain, social conflict, and emotional activation on ambulatory cardiovascular activity: Daily life consequences of recurring stress in a multiethnic adult sample.Health Psychology. 1998,17:17–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Goodie JL, Kamarck TW: Use of the Accutracker DX to assess behavioral influences on ambulatory cardiovascular activity: A preliminary investigation.Blood Pressure Monitoring. 1996,1:135–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marler MR, Jacob RG, Lehoczky JP, Shapiro AP: The statistical analysis of treatment effects in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings.Statistics in Medicine. 1988,xx:697–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW:Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raudenbush S, Bryk A, Cheong YF, Congdon R:HLM 5: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regressions: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Evans O, Steptoe A: The contribution of gender-role orientation, work factors and home stressors to psychological well-being and sickness absence in male- and female-dominated occupational groups.Social Science and Medicine. 2002,54:481–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hall EM: Gender, work control, and stress: A theoretical discussion and an empirical test.International Journal of the Health Services. 1989,19:725–745.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hall EM: Double exposure: The combined impact of the home and work environments on psychosomatic strain in Swedish women and men.International Journal of the Health Services. 1992,22:232–260.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hunt K, Annandale E: Relocating gender and morbidity: Examining men’s and women’s health in contemporary Western societies.Social Science and Medicine. 1999,48:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Light KC: Stress in employed women: A woman’s work is never done if she’s a working mom.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997,59:360–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Krantz G, Ostergren PO: Double exposure. The combined impact of domestic responsibilities and job strain on common symptoms in employed Swedish women.European Journal of Public Health. 2001,11:413–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Brisson C, Laflamme N, Moisan J, et al.: Effect of family responsibilities and job strain on ambulatory blood pressure among white-collar women.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1999,61:205–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Siegrist J: A theory of occupational stress. InStress in the Work Place: Past, Present and Future. London: Whurr, 2001, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  52. McEwen BS, Seeman T: Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999,896:30–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gallo LC, Matthews KA: Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: Do negative emotions play a role?Psychological Bulletin. 2003,129:10–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al.: Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs. ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999,282:539–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Verdecchia P: Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure: Current evidence and clinical implications.Hypertension. 2000,35:844–851.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al.: Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Hypertension. 2003,42:1206–1252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R: Prospective studies collaboration: Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality. A meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.The Lancet. 2002,360:1903–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis P, et al.: The relationship between job strain, alcohol, and ambulatory blood pressure.Hypertension. 1992,19:488–494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Mercando AD, Epstein S: Association of average heart rate on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms with incidence of new coronary events at 48-month follow-up in 1,311 patients (mean age 81 years) with heart disease and sinus rhythm.American Journal of Cardiology. 1996,78:1175–1176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Palatini P, Julius S: Heart rate and the cardiovascular risk.Journal of Hypertension. 1997,15:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Belkic K, Schnall P, Landsbergis P, et al.: Hypertension at the workplace: An occult disease? The need for work site surveillance. In Theorell T (ed),Everyday Biological Stress Mechanisms: Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 2001, 116–138.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lundberg U: Influence of paid and unpaid work on psychophysiological stress responses of men and women.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1996,1:117–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lundberg U, Frankenhaeuser M: Stress and workload of men and women in high-ranking positions.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1999,4:1422–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Peter R, Siegrist J, Hallqvist J, et al.: Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: Improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP Study.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2002,56:294–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kivimaki M, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, et al.: Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: Prospective cohort study of industrial employees.British Medical Journal. 2002,325:857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Boggild H, Knutsson A: Shift work, risk factors and cardiovascular disease. ScandinavianJournal of Work, Environment & Health. 1999,25:85–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, 92120, San Diego, CA

    Linda C. Gallo Ph.D.

  2. Department of Psychology, Kent State University, USA

    Laura M. Bogart Ph.D., Ana-Maria Vranceanu M.A. & Lisa C. Walt M.A.

Authors
  1. Linda C. Gallo Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura M. Bogart Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana-Maria Vranceanu M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lisa C. Walt M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda C. Gallo Ph.D..

Additional information

Laura Bogart is now with RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. This research was supported in part by a Kent State University Summer Research and Creativity Grant and by NIH Grant MH66101-01.

We thank Amy Jones and Evangelia Banou for assistance with data collection and data entry.

About this article

Cite this article

Gallo, L.C., Bogart, L.M., Vranceanu, AM. et al. Job characteristics, occupational status, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity in women. ann. behav. med. 28, 62–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2801_8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2801_8

Keywords

Search

Navigation