Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How neighborhoods and physical functioning are related: The roles of neighborhood socioeconomic status, perceived neighborhood strain, and individual health risk factors

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: increasing attention is being paid to the impact of neighborhood residence on individual health status. Purpose: This study examined pathways through which low neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and associated subjective neighborhood characteristics may be associated with self-reported physical functioning.Methods: A sample of 658 adults responded to a questionnaire survey sent to residents of lower and higher SES neighborhoods. Measures of neighborhood social cohesion and problems were obtained and individual deprivation, social integration, sense of control, and financial strain were assessed with standard measures. Physical functioning was assessed with the MOS 36-item Short Form health survey.Results: Structural equation modeling analyses showed that living in a lower socioeconomic neighborhood was associated with greater perceived neighborhood strain, which, in turn, was associated with poorer physical functioning. Lower neighborhood SES and greater perceived neighborhood strain were associated with poorer physical functioning of individuals through less social integration, less perceived control, and greater financial strain. Individual deprivation was also related to less social integration, less perceived control, and greater financial strain.Conclusions: Neighborhood SES and associated perceptions of neighborhoods are associated with physical functioning to some extent through the shaping of the social and psychological experiences of individuals living within them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert SA: Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context.Annual Review of Sociology, 1999,25:489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor SE, Repetti RL, Seeman T: Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin?Annual Review of Psychology, 1997,48:411 -447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pickett KE, Pearl M: Multilevel analyses of neighborhood socio-economic context and health outcomes: A critical review.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2001,55:111–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, et al.: Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.American Psychologist. 1994,49:15–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson RT, Sortie P, Backlund E, Johnson N, Kaplan GA: Mortality effects of community socioeconomic status.Epidemiology. 1997,8:42–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, et al.: Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease.New England Journal of Medicine, 2001,345:99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones K, Duncan C: Individuals and their ecologies: Analysing the geography of chronic illnesses within a multilevel modelling framework.Health and Place. 1995,1:27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robert SA: Community-level socioeconomic status effects on adult health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1998,39:18–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LeClere FB, Rogers RG, Peters K: Ethnicity and mortality in the United States: Individual and community correlates.Social Forces. 1997,76:169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawachi I, Berkman LF: Social cohesion, social capital and health, in Berkman LF, Kawachi I (eds),Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  11. VeenstraG: Social capital, SES, and health: An individual-level analysis.Social Science and Medicine. 2000,50:619–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F: Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.Science. 1997,277:918–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP: Health andsocial cohesion: Why care about income inequality?British Medical Journal. 1997,314:1037–1040.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Glass R: Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis.American Journal of Public Health. 1999,89:1187–1193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D: Social capital, income inequality, and mortality.American Journal of Public Health. 1997,87:1491–1498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aneshensel C, Sucoff CA: The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1996,37:293–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans GW; Environmental stress and health. In Baum A, Reven-son T, Singer JE (eds),Handbook of Health Psychology. Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2000, 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steptoe A, Feldman PJ: Neighborhood problems as sources of chrome stress: Development of a measure of neighborhood problems, and associations with socioeconomic sratus and health.Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2001,25:177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sooman A, Macintyre S: Health and perceptions of the local environment in socially contrasting neighborhoods in Glasgow.Health and Place. 1995,1:15–26,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ross CE, Jang SJ: Neighborhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbors.American Journal of Community Psychology. 2000,28:401–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gump BB, Matthews KA: Vigilance and cardiovascular reactivity to subsequent Stressors in men: A preliminary study.Health Psychology. 1998,17:93–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gump BB, Matthews KA: Do background Stressors influence reactivity to and recovery from acute Stressors?Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999,29:469–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams DR: Socioeconomic differentials in health: A review and redirection.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1991,53:81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robert SA: Neighborhood socioeconomic context and adult health: The mediating role of individual health behaviors and psychosocial factors.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999,896:465–468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Medical Care. 1992,30:473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bentier PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin. 1999,107:238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE: Measuring social class in U.S. Public Health Research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines.Annual Review of Public Health, 1997,18:341–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM: Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997,277:1940–1944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lachman ME, Weaver SL; Sociodemographic variations in sense of control by domain: Findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife.Psychology and Aging. 1998,13:553–562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pearlin LE, Menaghan EG, Lieberrnan MA, Mulian JT: The stress process.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1981,22:337–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross CE, Huber J: Hardship and depression.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1985,26:312–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Wright L, Coultor A:The UK SF-36: An analysis and interpretation-manual. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,51:1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bentler PM:EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: Multivariate Software, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Manne S, Glassman M: Perceived control, coping efficacy, and avoidance coping as mediators between spouses’ unsupportive behaviors and cancer patients’ psychological distress.Health Psychology. 2000,19:155–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y; On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988,6:74–95.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hills J:New Inequalities. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Levy L, Herzog A: Effects of crowding on health and social adaptation in the city of Chicago.Human Ecology. 1978,3:327–354.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schulkin J, McEwen BS, Gold PW: Allostasis, amygdala, and anticipatory angst.Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews. 1994,18:385–396.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ecob R, Macintyre S: Small area variations in health related behaviours: Do these depend on the behaviour itself, its measurement, or on personal characteristics?Health and Place. 2000,6:261–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ross C: Walking, exercising, and smoking: Does neighborhood matter?Social Science and Medicine. 2000,51:265–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Robert SA, House JS: Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Integrating individual-, community-, and societal-level theory and research. In Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC (eds),Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1999, 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krosnick JA: Survey research.Annual Review of Psychology. 1999,50:537–567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dunn JR, Hayes MY: Social inequality, population health, and housing: A study of two Vancouver neighborhoods.Social Science and Medicine. 2000,51:563–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 6BT, London, UK

    Pamela J. Feldman Ph.D. & Andrew Steptoe D.Phil.

Authors
  1. Pamela J. Feldman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Steptoe D.Phil.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Steptoe D.Phil..

Additional information

This research was supported by the Medical Research Council, UK.

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, P.J., Steptoe, A. How neighborhoods and physical functioning are related: The roles of neighborhood socioeconomic status, perceived neighborhood strain, and individual health risk factors. ann. behav. med. 27, 91–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_3

Keywords

Search

Navigation