Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 32–41

Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement

  • Karl J. Maier
  • Shari R. Waldstein
  • Stephen J. Synowski


The relation of primary cognitive appraisals to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, task engagement, and perceived stress was examined in 56 men (ages 18–29). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, preejection period, stroke index, cardiac index, and total peripheral resistance were assessed at rest and during performance of a computerized mental arithmetic task. Extending on prior investigations, threat and challenge appraisals were assessed independently from one another and from secondary appraisals. Positive and negative affect, task engagement, and levels of perceived stress were also assessed. Results indicated that threat (R2 = .08, p = .01), challenge (R2 = .14, p = .003), and their interaction (R2 = .11, p = .006) independently predicted DBP reactivity; DBP responses were greatest among participants with a high threat/low challenge pattern of appraisal. Threat appraisals predicted greater negative affect (R2 = .32) and perceived stress (R2 = .48), whereas challenge appraisals were related to greater positive affect (R2 = .44) and task engagement (R2 = .40, ps < .0001). Greater positive affect was correlated with increased SBP and DBP reactivity, and greater levels of task engagement with increased DBP response (ps ≤ .002). Results suggest that primary cognitive appraisals are more potent predictors of affect and task engagement than cardiovascular reactivity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Krantz DS, Manuck SB: Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic critique.Psychological Bulletin. 1984,96:435–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Manuck SB: Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular disease: “Once more unto the breach“.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,1:4–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Frijda NH:The Emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Houston BK: Personality characteristics, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light K (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. New York: Plenum, 1992, 103–123.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Monroe SB, Larkin KT, Kaplan JR: Psychophysiological reactivity as a dimension of individual differences. In Schneiderman N, Weiss SB, Kaufmann P (eds),Handbook of Methods and Measurements in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1989, 365.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Peacock EJ, Wong PTP: The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal.Stress Medicine. 1990,6:227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Waldstein SR, Neumann SA, Burns HO, Maier KJ: Role-played interpersonal interaction: Ecological validity and cardiovascular reactivity.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:302–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Sherwood A, Turner RJ: Hemodynamic responses during psychological stress: Implications for studying disease process.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,2:193–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Sherwood A, Dolan CA, Light KC: Hemodynamics of blood pressure responses during active and passive coping.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:656–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL: Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993,65:248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Hartley TR, Ginsburg GP, Heffner K: Self presentation and cardiovascular reactivity.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1999,32:75–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Quigley KS, Barrett LF, Weinstein S: Cardiovascular patterns associated with threat and challenge appraisals: A within-subjects analysis.Psychophysiology. 2002,39:292–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Kelsey RM, Blascovich J, Leitten CL, et al.: Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: The moderating effects of evaluative observation.Psychophysiology. 2000,37:748–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst JM: Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal.Journalof Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,73:63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Lepore SJ, et al.: Negative emotions and acute physiological response to stress.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:216–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Gerin W, Bovbjerg DH, Glynn L, et al.: Comment on “Negative Emotions and Acute Cardiovascular Responses to Laboratory Challenges”.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:223–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Schwartz GE, Weinberger DA, Singer JA: Cardiovascular differentiation of happiness, sadness, anger, and fear following imagery and exercise.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1981,43:343–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Sinha R, Lovallo WR, Parsons OA: Cardiovascular differentiation of emotions.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992,54:422–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Neumann SA, Waldstein SR: Similar patterns of cardiovascular response during emotional activation as a function of affective valence and arousal and gender.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2001,50:245–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Krantz DS, Manuck SB, Wing RR: Psychological stressors and task variables as elicitors of reactivity. In Matthews KA, Weiss SM, Detre T, et al. (eds),Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. New York: Wiley, 1986, 85–107.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Manuck SB, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, Poleferone JM: Behavioral factors in hypertension: Cardiovascular responsivity, anger, and social competence. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington: Hemisphere, 1985, 149–172.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Tomaka J, Palacios-Esquivel RL: Motivational systems and stress-related cardiovascular reactivity.Motivation and Emotion. 1997,21:275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Waldstein SR, Bachen EA, Manuck SB: Active coping and cardiovascular reactivity: A multiplicity of influences.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997,59:620–625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Stone AA, Neale JM, Shiffman S: Daily assessments of stress and coping and their association with mood.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,15:8–16.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Peacock EJ, Wong PTP, Reker GT: Relations between appraisals and coping schemas: Support for the congruence model.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Neuroscience. 1991,25:64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Monroe SM, Kelley JM: Measurement of stress appraisal. In Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood-Gordon L (eds),Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, 122–147.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Metropolitan Life Insurance Company:Statistical Bulletin. 1983,64:2–9.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,54:1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Sherwood A, Allen MT, Fahrenberg J, et al.: Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Manuck SB, Polefrone JM, Terrell DF, et al.: Absence of enhanced sympathoadrenal activity and behaviorally evoked cardiovascular reactivity among offspring of hypertensives.American Journal of Hypertension. 1996,9:248–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Muldoon MF, Bachen EA, Manuck SB, et al.: Acute cholesterol responses to mental stress and change in posture.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992,152:775–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Debski TT, Kamarck TW, Jennings JR, et al.: A computerized test battery for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity.International Journal of Biomedical Computers. 1991,27:277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson PP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH: Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiograph system.Aerospace Medicine. 1966,37:1208–1212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.Google Scholar
  36. (36).
    Keys A, Taylor HL, Blackburn J, et al.: Mortality and coronary heart disease among men studied for 23 years.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1971,128:201–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Falkner B, Kushner H, Onesti G, Angelakos ET: Cardiovascular characteristics in adolescents who develop essential hypertension.Hypertension. 1981,3:521–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Suarez EC, Williams RB: The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:558–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Everson SA, Mckey BS, Lovallo WR: Effect of trait hostility on cardiovascular responses to harassment in young men.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,2:172–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Smith TW, Christensen AJ: Cardiovascular reactivity and interpersonal relations: Psychosomatic processes in social context.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1992,11:279–301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl J. Maier
    • 1
  • Shari R. Waldstein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen J. Synowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBalti-more
  2. 2.Division of Gerontology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine & Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations