Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis

Abstract

Lazarus and Folkman proposed one of the most comprehensive theories of stress and coping in the psychology literature, but many of their postulates have received little empirical attention, and some of the existing research has yielded contradictory findings. This longitudinal study sought to clarify the associations among control appraisal, coping, and stress within this theoretical framework. The theory postulates that coping strategies used tend to match the level of appraised controllability of the stressor (matching hypothesis). It further states that the effects of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are moderated by the appraised controllability of the stressor (goodness-of-fit hypothesis). An alternative to the latter is the main-effects hypothesis, which states that problem-focused coping is generally more effective in reducing distress regardless of appraisal. These hypotheses were tested on 72 adults who completed questionnaires on coping and control appraisal. Stress was assessed using self-report (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised) and a behavioral measure (proofreading task) at two times approximately 2 months apart. Appraised control significantly predicted type of coping such that greater control was associated with more problem-focused and less emotion-focused coping. Although the main-effects hypothesis was not supported, the goodness-of-fit hypothesis was partly confirmed by a significant control by emotion-focused coping interaction predicting both self-report and behavioral measures of stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. (1)

    Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. (2)

    Folkman S, Lazarus RS: If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of college examination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985,48:150–170.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. (3)

    Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, DeLongis A: Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,50:571–579.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. (4)

    Moos RH (1974). Psychological techniques in the assessment of adaptive behavior. In Coelho GV, Hamburg DA, Adams JE (eds),Coping and Adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1974, 334–399.

    Google Scholar 

  5. (5)

    Vitaliano PP, Maiuro RD, Russo J, Becker J: Raw versus relative scores in the assessment of coping strategies.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1987,10:1–18.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. (6)

    Roberts SM: Applicability of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis to coping with daily hassles.Psychological Reports. 1995,77:943–954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. (7)

    Folkman S, Lazarus RS: An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1980,21:219–239.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. (8)

    Collins DL, Baum A, Singer, JE: Coping with chronic stress at Three Mile Island: Psychological and biochemical evidence.Health Psychology. 1983,2:149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. (9)

    Vaillant GE, Bond M, Vaillant CO: An empirically validated hierarchy of defense mechanisms.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1986,43:786–794.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. (10)

    Forsythe CJ, Compas BE: Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis.Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1987,11:473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. (11)

    Conway VJ, Terry DJ: Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis.Australian Journal of Psychology. 1992,44:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. (12)

    Felton BJ, Revenson TA: Coping with chronic illness: A study of illness controllability and the influence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1984,52:343–353.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. (13)

    Vitaliano PP, DeWolfe DJ, Maiuro RD, Russo J, Katon W: Appraised changeability of a stressor as a modifier of the relationship between coping and depression: A test of the hypothesis of fit.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990,59:582–592.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. (14)

    Baum A, Grunberg N, Singer JE: The use of psychological and neuroendocrinological measurements in the study of stress.Health Psychology. 1992,59:217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (15)

    Paulhus DL: Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (eds),Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1991, 17–59.

    Google Scholar 

  16. (16)

    Glass DC, Singer JE:Urban Stress. New York: Academic, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  17. (17)

    Baum A, Gatchel RJ, Schaeffer MA: Emotional, behavioral, and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983,51:565–572.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. (18)

    Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Carr JE, Maiur RD, Becker J: The Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and psychometric properties.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1985,20:3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. (19)

    Derogatis LR, Cleary PA: Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation.Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1977,33:981–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. (20)

    Derogatis LR:The SCL-90 Manual I: Scoring, Administration, and Procedures for the SCL-90. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. (21)

    Epping-Jordan JE, Compas BE, Osowiecki DM, et al.: Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: Processes of emotional distress.Health Psychology. 1999,18:315–326.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. (22)

    Cohen S: Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research a theory.Psychological Bulletin. 1980,88:82–108.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. (23)

    Gatchel RJ, Schaeffer MA, Baum A: A psychophysiological field study of stress at Three Mile Island.Psychophysiology. 1985,22:175–181.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. (24)

    Baum A: Stress, intrusive imagery, and chronic distress.Health Psychology. 1990,9:653–675.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. (25)

    Tabachnick B, Fidell LS:Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. (26)

    Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. (27)

    Aldwin CM, Revenson TA: Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987,53:337–348.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. (28)

    Seligman MEP:Depression, Helplessness, and Death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  29. (29)

    Folkman S, Chesney M, McKusick L, et al.: Translating coping theory into an intervention. In Eckerode J (ed),The Social Context of Coping. New York: Plenum Press, 1991, 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  30. (30)

    Chesney M, Folkman S, Chamber D: Coping effectiveness training for men living with HIV: Preliminary findings.International Journal of STD and AIDS. 1996,7(Suppl.):75–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra G. Zakowski Ph.D..

Additional information

We acknowledge Laura Redwine, Ph.D. for her contributions to the research project; Michele Hayward, M.S. and Janel Alberts, M.S. for their help with data processing; and Kimberly Laubmeier, M.S. for her comments on an earlier version of the article.

About this article

Cite this article

Zakowski, S.G., Hall, M.H., Klein, L.C. et al. Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis. ann. behav. med. 23, 158–165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Coping Strategy
  • Wishful Thinking
  • Uncontrollable Stressor
  • Coping Score
  • Support Seek