Sociodemographic correlates of selected health risk behaviors in a representative sample of Australian young people

  • Richard O. de Visser
  • Chris E. Rissel
  • Anthony M. A. Smith
  • Juliet Richters

Abstract

To facilitate the development of interventions to reduce health risk behavior among young people, we designed this study to compare risk behavior among young people and older people, to compare risk behavior profiles between young men and women, and to identify sociodemographic correlates of risk behavior among young people. Computer-assisted telephone interviews with a representative sample of 19,307 Australian men and women (response rate 73.1%) assessed alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, injection drug use, and unprotected intercourse. Respondents aged 16 to 24 reported less healthy behavior than older people. Although men and women aged 16 to 24 had similar profiles of health risk behavior, correlates of these behaviors differed for men and women. There were few consistent sociodemographic correlates of different risk behaviors. The results suggest that young women are now as important a priority as young men for interventions. Young people remain an important target group for health promotion, with nonheterosexual young people a particular high-risk group.

Key words

risk behavior representative sample adolescent young adult 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, D., Markovic, N., Danielson, M., Honnold, J., Janosky, J., & Schmidt, N. (2001). Behavioral risk factors for disease and preventive health practices among lesbians. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 972–975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, J., Tildesley, E., Hops, H., & Li, F. (2002). The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychology, 21, 349–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2002). 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings. Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Caspi, A., Begg, D., Dickson, N., Harrington, H., Langley, J., Moffitt, T., et al. (1997). Personality differences predict health-risk be- haviorsinyoung adulthood: Evidence fromalongitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1052–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, J., Bauman, A., Rissel, C., Tang, K., Forero, R., & Flaherty, B. (2000). Substance use in high school students in New South Wales, Australia, in relation to language spoken at home. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (2001). Measuring remoteness: Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
  8. de Visser, R., & Smith, A. (1999). Predictors of heterosexual condom use: Characteristics of the sexual encounter are more important than characteristics of the individual. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 4, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Visser, R., Smith, A., Rissel, C., Richters, J., & Grulich, A. (2003a). Sex in Australia: Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among a representative sample of Australian adults. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Visser, R., Smith, A., Rissel, C., Richters, J., & Grulich, A. (2003b). Sex in Australia: Safer sex and condom use among a representative sample of Australian adults. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubois-Arber, F., & Spencer, B. (1998). Condom use. In M. Hubert, N. Bajos, & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexual behaviour and HIV/ AIDS in Europe (pp. 287–302). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  12. Federal, Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. (1999). Statistical report on the health of Canadians. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Health Canada.Google Scholar
  13. French, R., & Power, R. (1998). A qualitative study of the social contextual use of alkyl nitrites (poppers) among targeted groups. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 57–76.Google Scholar
  14. Gallo, L., & Matthews, K. (2003). Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and health: Do negative emotions play a role? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 10–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gore, S., & Drugs Survey Investigators’ Consortium. (1999). Effective monitoring of young people’s use of illegal drugs. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruskin, E., Hart, S., Gordon, N., & Ackerson, L. (2001). Patterns of cigarette smoking and alcohol use among lesbians and bisexual women enrolled in a large health maintenance organisation. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 976–979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpern-Felsher, B., Millstein, S., & Ellen, J. (1996). Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 331–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris, A. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, D., White, V., & Effendi, Y. (2002). Changes in the use of tobacco among Australian secondary students. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 26, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, D., White, V., & Scollo, M. (1998). Smoking behaviours of Australian adults in 1995: Trends and concerns. Medical Journal of Australia, 168, 209–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hillier, L., Dempsey, D., Harrison, L., Matthews, L., & Beale, L. (1998). Writing themselves in: A national report on the sexuality, health and well-being of same sex attracted young people. Carlton South, Victoria, Australia: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society.Google Scholar
  22. Hillier, L., de Visser, R., Kavanagh, A., & McNair, R. (2003). The association between licit and illicit drug use and sexuality in young Australian women (letter). Medical Journal of Australia, 179, 326–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, L., O’Malley, P., & Bachman, J. (2002). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2001. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  24. Jordan, K. (2000). Substance abuse among gay lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and questioning adolescents. School Psychology Review, 29, 210–206.Google Scholar
  25. Laumann, E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leridon, H., van Zessen, G., & Hubert, M. (1998). The Europeans and their sexual partners. In M. Hubert, N. Bajos, & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexual behaviour and HIV/AIDS in Europe (pp. 165–196). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  27. MacDonald, Z. (1999). Illicit drug use in the UK. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, P., & Plant, M. (1996). Drinking, smoking, and illicit drug use among 15 and 16 year olds in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal, 313, 394–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2001). Australian alcohol guidelines: Health risks and benefits. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
  30. NSW Health Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Research. (2004). The NSW Adult Health Survey Program 2002. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pub- lic-health/survey/hsurvey.html.Google Scholar
  31. Pirkis, J., Irwin, C., Brindis, C., Patton, G., & Sawyer, G. (2003). Adolescent substance use: Beware of international comparisons. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 279–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid, A., Lynskey, M., & Copeland, J. (2000). Cannabis use among Australian adolescents: Findings of the 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richters, J., Bergin, S., Lubowitz, S., & Prestage, G. (2002). Women in contact with Sydney’s gay and lesbian community: Sexual identity, practice, and HIV risks. AIDS Care, 14, 193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siahpush, M., & Borland, R. (2001). Socio-demographic variations in smoking status among Australian aged > 18. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 438–442.Google Scholar
  35. Siliquini, R., Faggiano, F., Geninatti, S., Versino, E., Mitola, B., & Ippolito, R. (2001). Patterns of drug use among young men in Piedmont (Italy). Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 64, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, A., Rissel, C., Richters, J., Grulich, A., & de Visser, R. (2003). Sex in Australia: The rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stata Corporation. (2002). Stata statistical software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Valois, R., Dunham, A., Jackson, K., & Waller, J. (1999). Association between employment and substance abuse behaviors among public high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 256–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2003). Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard O. de Visser
    • 1
  • Chris E. Rissel
    • 2
  • Anthony M. A. Smith
    • 3
  • Juliet Richters
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Health SciencesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Central Sydney Area Health Service, and Australian Centre for Health PromotionUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & SocietyLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.National Centre in HIV Social ResearchUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SussexFalmerUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations