Exercise motivation and adherence in cancer survivors after participation in a randomized controlled trial: An attribution theory perspective

  • Kerry S. Courneya
  • Christine M. Friedenreich
  • Rami A. Sela
  • H. Arthur Quinney
  • Ryan E. Rhodes
  • Lee W. Jones
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine postprogram exercise motivation and adherence in cancer survivors who participated in the Group Psychotherapy and Home-Based Physical Exercise (GROUP-HOPE; Courneya, Friedenreich, Sela, Quinney, & Rhodes, 2002) trial. At the completion of the GROUP-HOPE trial, 46 of 51 (90%) participants in the exercise group completed measures of attribution theory constructs. A5-week follow-up self-report of exercise wasthen completed by 30 (65%) participants. Correlational analyses indicated that program exercise, perceived success, expected success, and affective reactions were strong predictors of postprogram exercise. In multivariate stepwise regression analyses, program exercise and perceived successwere the strongest predictors of postprogram exercise. Additionally, perceived success was more important than objective success in understanding the attribution process, and it interacted with personal control to influence expected success and negative affect. Finally, postprogram quality of life and changes in physical fitness were correlates of perceived success. We concluded that attribution theory may have utility for understanding postprogram exercise motivation and adherence in cancer survivors.

Key words

attribution theory cancer exercise motivation perceived success 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American College of Sports Medicine. (1998). Position stand on the recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility inhealthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 975–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American College of Sports Medicine. (2000). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th ed.). Philadelphia: American College of Sports Medicine: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, T. A., & Jackson, A. S. (1995). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science. Dubuque, IA: Brown.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard, C. M., Courneya, K. S., Rodgers, W. M., & Murnaghan, D. M. (2002). Determinants of exercise intention and behavior in breast and prostate cancer survivors: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Cancer Nursing, 25, 88–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, P. J., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Courneya, K. S., Blanchard, C. M., & Laing, D. M. (2001). Exercise adherence in breast cancer survivors training for a dragon boat race competition: A preliminary investigation. Psycho-Oncology 10, 444–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Courneya, K. S., & Friedenreich, C. M. (1997). Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. Journal of Alternative and Complimentary Medicine, 3, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C. M., Arthur, K., & Bobick, T. M. (1999). Physical exercise and quality of life in postsurgical colorectal cancer patients. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 4, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C., Sela, R., Quinney, H., & Rhodes, R. (2002). Correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial of exercise in cancer survivors: An application of the theory of planned behavior and the five factor model of personality. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 257–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C., Sela, R., Quinney, H., Rhodes, R., & Handman, M. (2003). The group psychotherapy and home-based physical exercise (GROUP-HOPE) trial in cancer survivors: Physical fitness and quality of life outcomes. Psycho-Oncology, 12, 357–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Courneya, K. S., Keats, M. R., & Turner, A. R. (2000). Social cognitive determinants of hospital-based exercise in cancer patients following high dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Courneya, K. S., Mackey, J. R., Bell, G. J., Jones, L. W., Field, C. J., & Fairey, A. S. (2003). Randomized controlled trial of exercise training in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: Cardiopulmonary and quality of life outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 1660–1668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Courneya, K. S., & McAuley, E. (1993). Efficacy, attributional, and affective responses of adults following an acute bout of exercise. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 729–742.Google Scholar
  18. Courneya, K. S., & McAuley, E. (1996). Understanding intentions to exercise following a structured exercise program: An attributional perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 670–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimeo, F. C., Fetscher, S., Lange, W., Mertelsmann, R., & Keul, J. (1997). Effects of aerobic exercise on the physical performance and incidence of treatment-related complications after high-dose chemotherapy. Blood, 90, 3390–3394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimeo, F. C, Stieglitz, R. D., Fischer-Novelli, U., Fetscher, S., & Keul, J. (1999). Effects of physical activity on the fatigue and psychologic status of cancer patients during chemotherapy. Cancer, 85, 2273–2277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godin, G., Jobin, J., & Bouillon, J. (1986). Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: A concurrent validity study. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 77, 359–361.Google Scholar
  22. Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10, 141–146.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, D. R., Ainsworth, B. E., Hartman, T. J., & Leon, A. S. (1993). A simultaneous evaluation of ten commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25, 81–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (1994). Essentials of exercise physiology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  25. McAuley, E. (1985). Success and casuality in sport: The influence of perception. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 283–295.Google Scholar
  26. McAuley, E. (1991). Efficacy, attributional, and affective responses to exercise participation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 382–393.Google Scholar
  27. McAuley, E. (1992). Self-referent thought in sport and physical activity. In T. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp. 101–118). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  28. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Russell, D. (1992). Measuring casual attributions: The revised Casual Dimension Scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McAuley, E., Poag, K., Gleason, A., & Wraith, S. (1990). Attrition from exercise programs: Attributional and affective perspectives. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 591–602.Google Scholar
  30. McAuley, E., & Tammen, V. (1989). The effects of subjective and objective competitive outcomes on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 84–93.Google Scholar
  31. Radloff, L. S. (1991). The use of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhodes, R. E., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examinationofthe theoryofplanned behaviorinthe exercise domain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 129–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoeneman, T., & Curry, S. (1990). Attributions for successful and unsuccessful health behavior change. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Segal, R., Evans, W., Johnson, D., Smith, J., Colletta, S., Gayton, J., et al. (2001). Structured exercise improves physical functioning in women with stages I and II breast cancer: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 657–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Segal, R. J., Reid, R. D., Courneya, K. S., Malone, S. C., Parliament, M. B., Scott, C. G., et al. (2003). Resistance exercise in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 1653–1659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, R., & Biddle, S. (1991). Exercise adherence in the commercial sector. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4, 154–155.Google Scholar
  37. Spielberger, C. D., Gorusch, R. L. & Lushene, R. F. (1970). Manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  38. Spink, K., & Roberts, G. (1980). Ambiguity of outcome and casual attributions. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 237–244.Google Scholar
  39. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Yellen, S. B., Cella, D. F., Webster, K., Blendowski, C., & Kaplan, E. (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13, 63–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry S. Courneya
    • 1
  • Christine M. Friedenreich
    • 2
  • Rami A. Sela
    • 3
  • H. Arthur Quinney
    • 4
  • Ryan E. Rhodes
    • 5
  • Lee W. Jones
    • 6
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical EducationUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada
  2. 2.Alberta Cancer BoardCalgary, AlbertaCanada
  3. 3.Department of OncologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada
  4. 4.Faculty of Physical EducationUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada
  5. 5.School of Physical EducationUniversity of VictoriaVictoria, British ColumbiaCanada
  6. 6.Faculty of Physical EducationUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations