Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 29–38 | Cite as

The neighborhood and home environments: Disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth

  • James N. Roemmich
  • Leonard H. Epstein
  • Samina Raja
  • Li Yin
Original Articles


Background: To increase participation in physical activity, it is important to understand the factors associated with a child’s choice to be physically active or sedentary. The neighborhood and home environments may be related to this choice.Purpose: To determine whether the neighborhood environment or number of televisions in the home environment are independently associated with child physical activity and television time.Methods: The associations of the neighborhood and home environments on active and sedentary behaviors were studied in 44 boys and 44 girls who wore accelerometers and recorded their television watching behaviors. Neighborhood environment variables were measured using extensive geographic information systems analysis.Results: Hierarchical regression analyses were used to predict physical activity after controlling for individual differences in age, socioeconomic status, percentage overweight, and time the accelerometer was worn in Step 1. Sex of the child was added in Step 2. A neighborhood design variable, street connectivity, accounted for an additional 6% (p≤·01) of the variability in physical activity in Step 3. A block of variables including a measure of neighborhood land use diversity, percentage park area, and the interaction of Percentage Park Area × Sex then accounted for a further 9% (p≤·01) of the variability in physical activity in Step 4. Increased access to parks was related to increased physical activity in boys but not in girls. The number of televisions in the home accounted for 6% (p≤·05) of the variability in television watching behavior. Neighborhood environment variables did not predict television watching that occurs in the home.Conclusion: The neighborhood environment is more strongly associated with physical activity of boys than girls. Sedentary behaviors are associated with access to television in the home environment. To promote physical activity in children, planners need to design environments that support active living and parents should limit access to television viewing in the home.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Gordy CC, Dorn J: Decreasing sedentary behaviors in treating pediatric obesity.Archies of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2000,154:220–226.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Epstein LH, Roemmich JN: Reducing sedentary behavior: Role in modifying physical activity.Exercise and Sport Science Reviews. 2001,29:103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Nader PR, et al.: Home environmental influences on children’s television watching from early to middle childhood.Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2002,23:127–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Dennison BA, Erb TA, Jenkins PL: Television viewing and television in bedroom associated with overweight risk among low-income preschool children.Pediatrics. 2002,109:1028–1035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Epstein LH, Smith JA, Vara LS, Rodefer JS: Behavioral economic analysis of activity choice in obese children.Health Psychology. 1991,10:311–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Smith JA, Epstein LH: Behavioral economic analysis of food choice in obese children.Appetite. 1991,17:91–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Johnson WG, Parry W, Drabman RS: The performance of obese and normal size children on a delay of gratification task.Addictive Behaviors. 1978,3:205–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Ewing R: Can the physical environment determine physical activity levels?Exercise and Sport Science Reviews. 2005,33:69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE: How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,23:64–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Frank GC: Environmental influences on methods used to collect dietary data from children.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994,59:207S-211S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Saelens BE: Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults.American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003,18:83–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Huston SL, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z: Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population.American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003,18:58–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Dunton GF, Jamner MS, Cooper DM: Assessing the perceived environment among minimally active adolescent girls: Validity and relations to physical activity outcomes.American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003,18:70–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al.:CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and Development. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Huston AC, Wright JC, Marquis J, Green SB: How young children spend their time: Television and other activities.Developmental Psychology. 1999,35:912–925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Larson RW, Verma S: How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play and developmental opportunities.Psychological Bulletin. 1999,125:701–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Hollingshead AB:Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, et al.: The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: An observational study.Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise. 1995,27:1033–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Anderson DR, Field DE, Collins PA, Lorch EP, Nathan JG: Estimates of young children’s time with television: A methodological comparison of parent reports with time-lapse video home observation.Child Development. 1985,56:1345–1357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Unterman D.Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. Personal Travel in the U.S., Vol. II: A Report of the Findings from 1983–1984 NPTS, Source Control Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE: Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005,28:117–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Garcia AW, Pender NJ, Antonakos CL, Ronis DL: Changes in physical activity beliefs and behaviors of boys and girls across the transition to junior high school.Journal of Adolescent Health. 1998,22:394–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Guillaume M, Lapidus L, Bjorntorp P, Lambert A: Physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular risk factors in children. The Belgian Luxembourg Child Study II.Obesity Research. 1997,5:549–556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Shephard RJ, Jequier JC, Lavallee H, La Barre R, Rajic M: Habitual physical activity: Effects of sex, milieu, season and required activity.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1980,20:55–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Kloeden CN, McLean AJ, Moore VM, Ponte G:Traveling Speed and the Risk of Crash Involvement. NHMRC Road Accident Research Unit, University of Adelaide, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Stuster J, Coffman Z:Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Limits. FHWA No. FHWARD-98-154. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Finch DJ, Kompfner P, Lockwood CR, Maycock G:Speed, Speed Limits and Accidents. Transport Research Laboratory, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    ESRI.ESRI GIS and Mapping Software. Redlands, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S: Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity.American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003,18:47–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH: Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity.New England Journal of Medicine. 1997,337:869–873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Janz KF, Dawson JD, Mahoney LT: tracking physical fitness and physical activity from childhood to adolescence: The Muscatine study.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000,32:1250–1257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Pate RR, Baranowski T, Dowda M, Trost SG: Tracking of physical activity in young children.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996,28:92–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Roemmich JN, Clark PA, Walter K, et al.: Pubertal alterations in growth and body composition. V. Energy expenditure, adiposity, and fat distribution.American Journal of Physiology. 2000,279:E1426–1436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Sirard JR, Pate RR: Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents.Sports Medicine. 2001,31:439–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Sunnegardh J, Bratteby LE, Sjolin S: Physical activity and sports involvement in 8- and 13-year-old children in Sweden.Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. 1985,74:904–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Timperio A, Crawford D, Telford A, Salmon J: Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children.Preventive Medicine. 2004,38:39–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Garcia AW, Broda MA, Frenn M, et al.: Gender and developmental differences in exercise beliefs among youth and prediction of their exercise behavior.Journal of School Health. 1995,65:213–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL, et al.: Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool children.Health Psychology. 1993,12:390–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Stucky-Ropp RC, DiLorenzo TM: Determinants of exercise in children.Preventive Medicine. 1993,22:880–889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Gentle P, Caves R, Armstrong N, Balding J, Kirby B: High and low exercisers among 14- and 15-year-old children.Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1994,16:186–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Baranowski T, Thompson WO, DuRant RH, Baranowski J, Puhl J: Observations on physical activity in physical locations: Age, gender, ethnicity, and month effects.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1993,64:127–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hanson CL, Haddock CK, Klesges LM: Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers.Health Psychology. 1990,9:435–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA: The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005,28:159–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, et al.: Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005,28:169–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Paluch RA, Raynor HA: Physical activity as a substitute for sedentary behavior in youth.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005,29:200–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • James N. Roemmich
    • 1
  • Leonard H. Epstein
    • 2
  • Samina Raja
    • 3
  • Li Yin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics and Department of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics and Department of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  3. 3.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations