Illness by suggestion: Expectancy, modeling, and gender in the production of psychosomatic symptoms
- 301 Downloads
Background: Expectancy and modeling have been cited as factors in mass psychogenic illness (MPI), which reportedly affects more women than men.Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the effects of expectancy and modeling in a controlled laboratory analogue of MPI.Methods: Students were randomly assigned to inhale or not inhale an inert placebo described as a suspected environmental toxin that had been linked to four symptoms typical of reported instances of MPI. Half of the students observed a female confederate inhale the substance and subsequently display the specified symptoms.Results: Students who inhaled the placebo reported greater increases in symptoms, and the increase was significantly greater for the specified symptoms than for other symptoms. Observation of the confederate displaying symptoms increased specified symptoms significantly among women but not among men. Changes in reported symptoms were significantly associated with changes in unobtrusively observed behavior.Conclusions: Symptoms typical of clinical reports of MPI can be induced by manipulating response expectancies, and the effects are specific rather than generalized. Among women, this effect is enhanced by observing another participant (who in this study is also female) display symptoms. This suggests that the preponderance of women showing symptoms in outbreaks of MPI may be due to gender-linked differences in the effects of modeling on psychogenic symptoms.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (5).Kirsch I (ed):How Expectancies Shape Experience. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1999.Google Scholar
- (12).Bandura A:Social Learning Theory, New York: Prentice Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
- (13).Pennebaker JW: Social and perceptual factors affecting symptom reporting and mass psychogenic illness. In Colligan MJ, Pennebaker JW, Murphy LR (eds),Mass Psychogenic Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
- (15).Frank JD:Persuasion and Healing (Rev. Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
- (16).Hahn RA: The nocebo phenomenon: Scope and foundations. In Harrington A (ed),The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997, 56–76.Google Scholar
- (18).Kerckhoff AC, Back KW:The June Bug: A Study of Hysterical Contagion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.Google Scholar
- (19).Sirois F: Epidemic hysteria.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Suppl. 252, 1974:44.Google Scholar
- (20).Boss LP: Epidemic hysteria: A review of the published literature.Epidemiological Reviews, 1997,19:233–243.Google Scholar
- (21).Colligan MJ, Murphy LR: Mass psychogenic illness in organizations: An overview.Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1979,52:77–90.Google Scholar