Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 202–210

Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening

  • Deborah J. Bowen
  • Jennifer D. Allen
  • Thuy Vu
  • Robin E. Johnson
  • Kelly Fryer-Edwards
  • Alton Hart


Background: Decision aids are currently being developed and evaluated for use in cancer-screening decisional settings.Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review and discuss the theoretical basis of interventions to promote informed decision making in cancer screening.Methods: We reviewed interventions cited in Briss et al. (1) and Rimer et al. (2) to identify their theoretical basis, intervention content, measurement strategies, and outcomes.Results: Few interventions had a strong, decision-oriented conceptual basis. This was apparent in their intervention content, the measurement strategy, and the choice of outcomes for the study.Conclusions: We recommend that more research occur into the basis of decision making in cancer screening and that future interventions use this research to rigorously design and evaluate decision aids to help people make choices about cancer screening.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al.: Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004,26:67–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan EC, Woolf SH: Informed decision making: What is its role in cancer screening?Cancer. 2004,101(Suppl):1214–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL: Four models of the physician-patient relationship.Journal of the American Medical Assocation. 1992,267:2221–2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Braddock III CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W: Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics.Journal of the American Medical Assocation. 1999,282:2313–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, et al.: Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000,18(Suppl):35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Volk RJ, Cass AR, Spann SJ: A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.Archives of Family Medicine. 1999,8:333–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    O’Connor AM, Fiset V, De Grasse C, et al.: Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: Evidence of efficacy and policy implications.Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 1999, 67-80.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al.: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Glanz K, Rimer B, Lewis FM (eds):Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Rimer BK, Halabi S, Sugg Skinner C, et al.: Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22:247–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Rimer BK, Halabi S, Sugg Skinner C, et al.: The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions.Patient Education and Counseling. 2001,43:269–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L: Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000,133:761–769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Dolan JG, Frisina S: Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid colorectal cancer screening.Medical Decision Making. 2002,22:125–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Schapira MM, Van Ruiswyk J: The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests.Journal of Family Practice. 2000,49:418–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Flood AB, Wennberg JE, Nease RF, et al.: The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1996,11:342–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Frosch DL, Kaplan RM, Felitti V: The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001,16:391–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Davison BJ, Kirk P, Degner LF, Hassard TH: Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer.Patient Education and Counseling. 1999,37:255–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Wolf AM, Schorling JB: Does informed consent alter elderly patients’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2000,15:24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Wolf AM, Nasser JF, Schorling JB: The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996,156:1333–1336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Wolf AM, Schorling JB: Preferences of elderly men for prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent.Journal of Gerontology A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 1998,53:M195-M200.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Wilt TJ, Paul J, Murdoch M, et al.: Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet.Effective Clinical Practice. 2001,4:112–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Lawrence VA, Streiner D, Hazuda HP, et al.: A cross-cultural consumer-based decision aid for screening mammography.Preventive Medicine. 2000,30:200–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Bowen D, Moinpour C, Thompson B, et al.: Creating a framework for public health intervention design. In Miller SM, Bowen D, Croyle RT, Rowland JH (eds),Handbook of Behavioral Science and Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, in press.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock IM: The health belief model. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997, 41–59.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers K: The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change. In Glanz K, Rimer B, Lewis FM (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 99–120.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Miller SM, Shoda Y, Hurley K: Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: Breast self-examination in cancer screening.Psychological Bulletin. 1996,119:70–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Frosch DL, Kaplan RM: Shared decision making in clinical medicine: Past research and future directions.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1999,17:285–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Miller SM: Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease: Implications for cancer screening and management.Cancer. 1995,76:167–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Miller SM, Fang CY, Manne SL, Engstrom PE, Daly MB: Decision making about prophylactic oophorectomy among at-risk women: Psychological influences and implications.Gynecologic Oncology. 1999,75:406–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Barry MJ: Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002,136:127–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Myers RE, Kunkel EJ: Preparatory education for informed decision-making in prostate cancer early detection and treatment.Seminars in Urologic Oncology. 2000,18:172–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA: Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1989,4:23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Nease Jr. RF, Brooks WB: Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: The Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1995,10:593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Committee on Quality Health Care in America:Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah J. Bowen
    • 1
  • Jennifer D. Allen
    • 2
  • Thuy Vu
    • 1
  • Robin E. Johnson
    • 3
  • Kelly Fryer-Edwards
    • 4
  • Alton Hart
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Public HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteUSA
  3. 3.Mount Holyoke CollegeUSA
  4. 4.University of Washington, School of MedicineUSA
  5. 5.Department of Internal MedicineVirginia Commonwealth UniversityUSA
  6. 6.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattle

Personalised recommendations