Correlates of physical activity among individuals with multiple sclerosis

  • Robert W. Motl
  • Erin M. Snook
  • Edward McAuley
  • Jennifer A. Scott
  • Martha L. Douglass


Background: There is accumulating evidence that individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are less physically active than nondiseased populations. One method for increasing the level of participation in physical activity among MS patients involves the identification of factors that correlate with physical activity and that are modifiable by a well-designed intervention.Purpose: This study adopts a social cognitive perspective and examines self-efficacy, enjoyment, social support, and disability as correlates of participation in physical activity among individuals with MS.Methods: We recruited 196 individuals with a diagnosis of MS from the Midwest region of the United States. The participants completed a battery of questionnaires and then wore a belt with an accelerometer for a 7-day period. The data were analyzed using covariance modeling.Results: Enjoyment (γ = .38, p > .001), social support (γ = .15, p > .05), and disability (γ =.18, p > .01) had statistically significant direct relations with self-efficacy, and self-efficacy (β = .29, p > .001) and enjoyment (γ = .28, p > .001) had statistically significant direct relations with physical activity.Conclusions: Future researchers should consider examining self-efficacy and enjoyment as possible components of an intervention that is designed to increase physical activity participation in MS patients.


  1. (1).
    National Multiple Sclerosis Society:Multiple Sclerosis Information Sourcebook. New York: Information Resource Center and Library of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, et al.: The natural history of multiple sclerosis: A geographically based study. Clinical course and disability.Brain. 1989,112:133–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Runmarker B, Andersen O: Prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis incident cohort with twenty-five years of follow-up.Brain. 1993,116:117–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Frohman EM, Racke M, van den Noort S: To treat, or not to treat: The therapeutic dilemma of idiopathic monosymptomatic demyelinating syndromes.Archives of Neurology. 2000,57:930–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Benito-Leon J, Morales JM, Rivera-Navarro J, Mitchell AJ: A review about the impact of multiple sclerosis on healthrelated quality of life.Disability and Rehabilitation. 2003,25:1291–1303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM: Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research.Public Health Reports. 1985,100:126–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Simmons RD, Ponsonby A-L, van der Mei IAF, Sheridan P: What affects your MS? Responses to an anonymous, Internet-based epidemiological survey.Multiple Sclerosis. 2004,10:202–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Stuifbergen A: Meeting the demands of illness: Types and sources of support for individuals with MS and their partners.Rehabilitation and Nursing Research. 1992,1:14–23.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Oken BS, Kishiyama S, Zajdel D, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of yoga and exercise in multiple sclerosis.Neurology. 2004,62:2058–2064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Petejan JH, Gappmaier E, White A, et al.: Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis.Annals of Neurology. 1996,39:432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Schapiro RT:Managing the Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis (4th Ed.). New York: Demos Medical, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Motl RW, Snook E, McAuley E: Physical activity and its correlates among people with multiple sclerosis: Literature review and future directions. In Columbus F (ed),Progress in Multiple Sclerosis Research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science, 2005, 185–201.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM: Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis.Multiple Sclerosis. 2005,11:459–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevalence of no leisure-time physical activity—35 states and District of Columbia, 1988-2002.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2004,53:82–86.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better?American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:266–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Stuifbergen AK, Roberts G: Exercise behaviors of older adults with multiple sclerosis [Abstract].Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 1997,5:388–389.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Stuifbergen AK: Barriers and health behaviors in rural and urban persons with MS.American Journal of Health Behavior. 1999,23:415–425.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    McAuley E, Blissmer B: Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity.Exercise and Sport Science Reviews. 2000,28:85–88.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W: Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: Review and update.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2002,34:1996–2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Duncan TE, McAuley E: Social support and efficacy cognition in exercise adherence: A latent growth curve analysis.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,16:199–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    McAuley E, Jerome GJ, Marquez DX, Elavsky S, Blissmer B: Exercise self-efficacy in older adults: Social, affective, and behavioral influences.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,25:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    McAuley E, Jerome GJ, Elavsky S, Marquez DX, Ramsey SN: Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults.Preventive Medicine. 2003,37:110–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM, Scott JA: Accuracy of two electronic pedometers for measuring steps taken under controlled conditions among ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis.Multiple Sclerosis. 2005,11:343–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Motl RW, Snook EM, McAuley E, Scott JA: Validity of physical activity measures in ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis.Disability and Rehabilitation (in press, 2006).Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    McAuley E: Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,16:103–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KL: Physical activity enjoyment scale: Two validation studies.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1991,13:50–64.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Motl RW, Dishman RK, Saunders RP, et al.: Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001,21:110–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Cutrona C, Russell D: The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress.Advances in Personal Relationships. 1987,1:37–67.Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, Rosengren K, Morris KS: Measuring disability and function in older women: Psychometric properties of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2005,60:901–909.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Godin G, Shephard RJ: A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science. 1985,10:141–146.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Haensch CL, Jörg J: Autonomic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.Journal of Neurology. 2006,253(Suppl.):1/3–1/9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Chen KY, Bassett DR: The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: Current and future.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2005,37(Suppl.):S490-S500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP: Accelerometer use in physical activity: Best practices and research recommendations.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2005,37(Suppl.):S582-S588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Warms C: Physical activity measurement in persons with chronic and disabling conditions: Methods, strategies, and issues.Family and Community Health. 2006,29(Suppl.):78S-88S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Anderson JC, Gerbing DW: Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin. 1988,103:411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Bollen KA:Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Hu L, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling. 1999,6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    McAuley E, Courneya KS, Rudolph DL, Lox CL: Enhancing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and females.Preventive Medicine. 1994,23:498–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Petejan JH, White AT: Recommendations for physical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis.Sports Medicine. 1999,27:179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Stevens M, Lemmink KAPM, van Heuvelen MJG, de Jong J, Rispens P: Groningen Active Living Model (GALM): Stimulating physical activity in sedentary older adults; validation of the behavioral change model.Preventive Medicine. 2003,37:561–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Wankel LM: The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity.International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1993,24:151–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Motl
    • 1
  • Erin M. Snook
    • 1
  • Edward McAuley
    • 1
  • Jennifer A. Scott
    • 1
  • Martha L. Douglass
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Community HealthUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Community HealthUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations