Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 155–165

The California active aging community grant program: Translating science Into practice to promote physical activity in older adults

  • Steven P. Hooker
  • William Seavey
  • Curtiss E. Weidmer
  • Danielle J. Harvey
  • Anita L. Stewart
  • Dawn E. Gillis
  • Katrina Lennea Nicholl
  • Abby C. King
Article

Abstract

Background: Attempts to study the translation of evidence-based physical activity interventions in community settings are scarce.Purpose: This project was an investigation of whether 13 diverse local lead agencies could effectively implement a choice-based, telephone-assisted physical activity promotion program for older adults based on intervention models proven efficacious in research settings.Methods: At baseline, participants developed their own physical activity programs through an individualized planning session based on preference, health status, readiness to change, and available community resources. Thereafter, participants received regular telephone calls over a 1-year period from a trained staff member or volunteer support buddy. Additional program components consisted of health education workshops, newsletters, and group-based physical activities. Self-report data on caloric expenditure due to all and moderate or greater intensity physical activities were collected from 447 participants (M age = 68 ± 8.6 years).Results: A significant increase (p ≤ .0001) from baseline to midintervention and intervention endpoint was observed for total weekly caloric expenditure (Mdn change = 644–707 kcal/week) and moderate or greater weekly caloric expenditure (Mdn change = 149–265 kcal/week), as well as for weekly physical activity duration and frequency. These changes were observed in participants across all sites.Conclusions: The increases in weekly caloric expenditure were commensurate with findings from several previous randomized clinical trials. The utilization of community agency staff and volunteers receiving basic training to implement essential program components proved feasible. Very favorable levels of program satisfaction expressed by community staff, volunteer support buddies, and participants, combined with the significant increases in physical activity, warrant further dissemination of the intervention model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. (1).
    Crespo CJ, Keteyian SJ, Heath GW, Sempos CT: Leisure-time physical activity among US adults.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996,156:93–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Yusuf HR, Croft JB, Giles WH, et al.: Leisure-time physical activity among older adults.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996,156:1321–1326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al.: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review.American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2002,22(4S):73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC: Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.American Journal of Public Health. 2003,93:1261–1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, et al.: The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004,27:3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    King AC, Rejeski WJ, Buchner DM: Physical activity interventions targeting older adults: A critical review and recommendations.American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 1998,15:316–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Castro CM, King AC: Telephone-assisted counseling for physical activity.Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2002,30:64–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    King AC, Haskell WL, Young DR, et al.: Long-term effects of varying intensities and formats of physical activity on participation rates, fitness, and lipoproteins in men and women aged 50 to 65 years.Circulation. 1995,91:2596–2604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    King AC, Pruitt LA, Phillips WT, et al.: Comparative effects of two physical activity programs on measured and perceived physical functioning and other health-related quality of life outcomes in older adults.Journal of Gerontology. 2000,55A:M74-M83.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    King AC, Taylor CB, Haskell WL: Effects of differing intensities and formats of 12 months of exercise training on psychological outcomes in older adults.Health Psychology. 1993,12:292–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Stewart AL, Mills KM, Sepsis PG, et al.: Evaluation of CHAMPS, a physical activity promotion program for older adults.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1997,19:353–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Stewart AL, Verboncoeur CJ, McLellan BY, et al.: Physical activity outcomes of CHAMPS II: A physical activity promotion program for older adults.Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences. 2001,56A:M465-M470.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    King AC, Kiernan M, Oman R, et al.: Can we identify who will adhere to long-term physical activity? Signal detection methodology as a potential aid to clinical decision making.Health Psychology. 1997,16:380–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    DeBusk RF, Haskell WL, Miller NH, et al.: Medically directed at-home rehabilitation soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: A new model for patient care.American Journal of Cardiology. 1985,55:251–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Stewart AL, King AC, Haskell WL: Endurance exercise and health-related quality of life in 50–65 year-old adults.Gerontologist. 1993,33:782–789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    King AC, Baumann K, O’Sullivan P, et al.: Effects of moderate-intensity exercise on physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to family caregiving: A randomized control trial.Journal of Gerontology. 2002,57A:M26-M36.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    King AC, Taylor CB, Haskell WL, Debusk CB: Strategies for increasing early adherence and long-term maintenance to home-based exercise training in healthy middle-aged men and women.American Journal of Cardiology. 1988,61:628–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    King AC, Castro C,Wilcox S, et al.: Personal and environmental factors associated with physical activity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women.Health Psychology. 2000,19:354–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Wilcox S, King AC, Brassington GS, et al.: Physical activity preferences of middle-aged and older adults: a community analysis.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 1999,7:386–399.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Mills KM, Stewart AL, Sepsis PG, King AC: Consideration of older adults’ preferences for format of physical activity.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 1997,5:50–58.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Shephard RJ: PAR-Q, Canadian Home Fitness Test and exercise screening alternatives.Sports Medicine. 1988,5:185–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al.: Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American College of Sports Medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,273:402–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL: An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001,33:962–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, et al.: CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: Outcomes for interventions.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001,33:1126–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS: Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise.Health Psychology. 1992,11:257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Prochaska JO: A transtheoretical model of behavior change: Learning from mistakes with majority populations. In Becker DM, Hill DR, Jackson JS, et al. (eds),Health Behavior Research in Minority Populations: Access, Design, and Implementation. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1992, 105–111.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Laird NM, Ware JH: Random-effects models for longitudinal data.Biometrics. 1982, 38:963–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Dunn A, Marcus B, Kampert J, et al.: Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999,281:327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Napolitano MA, Marcus BH: Targeting and tailoring physical activity information using print and information technologies.Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2002,30:122–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC: Promoting physical activity for older adults: The challenges for behavior change.American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2003,25:172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Blair SN, Kohl HW, Gordon NF, et al.: How much physical activity is good for health?Annual Review of Public Health. 1992,13:99–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    American College of Sports Medicine: ACSM position stand on exercise and physical activity for older adults.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998,30:992–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven P. Hooker
    • 1
  • William Seavey
    • 2
  • Curtiss E. Weidmer
    • 3
  • Danielle J. Harvey
    • 4
  • Anita L. Stewart
    • 5
  • Dawn E. Gillis
    • 5
  • Katrina Lennea Nicholl
    • 6
  • Abby C. King
    • 7
  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterUniversity of South CarolinaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geriatric MedicineUniversity of California Davis Medical CenterUSA
  3. 3.Epidemiology and Health Promotion SectionCalifornia Department of Health ServicesUSA
  4. 4.Division of BiostatisticsDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine University of California DavisUSA
  5. 5.Institute for Health and AgingUniversity of CaliforniaSan Francisco
  6. 6.School of NursingJohns Hopkins UniversityUSA
  7. 7.School of MedicineStanford UniversityUSA
  8. 8.Prevention Research CenterUniversity of South CarolinaColumbia

Personalised recommendations