Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 158–162 | Cite as

A Preliminary study of one year of pedometer self-monitoring

  • Catrine Tudor-Locke
  • David R. BassettJr.
  • Ann M. Swartz
  • Scott J. Strath
  • Brian B. Parr
  • Jared P. Reis
  • Katrina D. DuBose
  • Barbara E. Ainsworth

Abstract

Background: Long-term pedometer monitoring has not been attempted.Purpose: The purpose of this project was to collect 365 days of continuous self-monitored pedometer data to explore the natural variability of physical activity.Methods: Twenty-three participants (7 men, 16 women; M age = 38 ± 9.9 years; M body mass index = 27.7± 6.2 kg/m2) were recruited by word of mouth at two southern U.S. universities. Participants were asked to wear pedometers at their waist during waking hours and record steps per day and daily behaviors (e.g., sport/exercise, work or not) on a simple calendar. In total, participants wore pedometers and recorded 8,197 person-days of data (of a possible 8,395 person-days, or 98%) for a mean of 10,090± 3,389 steps/day. Missing values were estimated using the Missing Values Analysis EM function in SPSS, Version 11.0.1.Results: A mean of 10,082± 3,319 steps/day was computed. Using the corrected data, differences in steps/day were significant for season (summer > winter, F = 7.57, p = .001), day of the week (weekday > weekend, F = 3.97, p = .011), type of day (workday vs. nonworkday, F = 9.467, p = .008), and participation in sport/exercise (day with sport/exercise > day without sport/exercise, F = 102.5, p < .0001).Conclusions: These data suggest that surveillance should be conducted in the spring/fall or that an appropriate correction factor should be considered if the intent is to capture values resembling the year-round average.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Regerence

  1. (1).
    Rafferty AP, Reeves MJ, McGee HB: Compliance with physical activity recommendations by walking for exercise—Michigan, 1996 and 1998.Morbibity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2000,49:560–565.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Yusuf HR, Croft JB, Giles WH, et al.: Leisure-time physical activity among older adults: United States, 1990.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996,156(12):1321–1326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Prevalence of leisure-time physical activity among overweight adults— United States, 1998.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2000,49(15):326–330.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Ainsworth BE, Leon AS, Richardson MT, Jacobs DR, Paffenbarger RS: Accuracy of the college alumnus physical activity questionnaire.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993,46(12):1403–1411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Bassett Jr. DR, Cureton AL, Ainsworth BE: Measurement of daily walking distance—questionnaire versus pedometer.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000,32(5):1018–1023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Tudor-Locke C, Myers AM: Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.Sports Medicine. 2001,31(2):91–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Rowlands AV, Eston RG, Ingledew EK: Measurement of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of heart rate and pedometry.Sports Medicine. 1997,24(4):258–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Tudor-Locke C, Myers AM: Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2001,72(1):1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Bassett Jr. DR: Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71(2):30–36.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D: Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71(Suppl. 2):59–73.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Freedson PS, Miller K: Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71(2):21–29.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Bassett Jr. DR, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, et al.: Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996,28(8):1071–1077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P: Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000,32(9):S442-S450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Bassett Jr. DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, et al.: Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000,32(Suppl. 9):S471-S480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Krueger RA:Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Whitt MC, et al.: The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables.International Journal of Obesity. 2001,25:1571–1578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Hatano Y: Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise.International Council for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. 1993,29:4–8.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Leermakers EA, Dunn AL, Blair SN: Exercise management of obesity.Medical Clinics of North America. 2000,84(2):419–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Morgan DL, Krueger RA:The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    DeSa P: Easy steps to shape up and slim down.Prevention. 2001,July:150–157.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Kosta E: Make every step count.Walking. 2001,June:54–61, 100–101.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Spilner M, Robertson S: Take 10,000 a day!Prevention. 2000,July:90.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Michaud PA, Cauderay M, Narring F, Schutz Y: Assessment of physical activity with a pedometer and its relationship with VO2max among adolescents in Switzerland.Soz Praventivmed. 2002,47(2):107–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Tudor-Locke C, Jones GR, Myers AM, Paterson DH, Ecclestone NA: Contribution of structured exercise class participation and informal walking for exercise to daily physical activity in community-dwelling older adults.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2002,73(3):350–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ: Variability of some objective measures of physical activity.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1992,24(10):1167–1172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Lee CJ, Lawler GS, Panemangalore M, Street D: Nutritional status of middle-aged and elderly females in Kentucky in two seasons: Part 1. Body weight and related factors.Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1987,6(3):209–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Levin S, Jacobs Jr. DR, Ainsworth BE, Richardson MT, Leon AS: Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity.Annals of Epidemiology. 1999,9(8):481–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Matthews CE, Freedson PS, Stanek III EJ, et al.: Seasonal variation in household, occupational, and leisure time physical activity: Longitudinal analyses from the seasonal variation of blood cholesterol study.American Journal of Epidemiology. 2001,153:172–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Sequeira MM, Rickenbach M,Wietlisbach V, Tullen B, Schutz Y: Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1995,142(9):989–999.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catrine Tudor-Locke
    • 1
  • David R. BassettJr.
    • 2
  • Ann M. Swartz
    • 3
  • Scott J. Strath
    • 3
  • Brian B. Parr
    • 4
  • Jared P. Reis
    • 5
  • Katrina D. DuBose
    • 6
  • Barbara E. Ainsworth
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Exercise and WellnessArizona State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health and Exercise ScienceThe University of TennesseeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Movement SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.Exercise and Sports ScienceUniversity of South Carolina AikenUSA
  5. 5.Graduate School of Public HealthSan Diego State UniversityUSA
  6. 6.Center for Physical Activity & Weight ManagementSchiefelbusch Institute for Lifespan Studies University of KansasUSA
  7. 7.Department of Exercise & Nutritional SciencesSan Diego State UniversityUSA
  8. 8.Department of Exercise and WellnessArizona State UniversityMesa

Personalised recommendations