Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 125–130 | Cite as

Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior

  • Noel T. Brewer
  • Neil D. Weinstein
  • Cara L. Cuite
  • James E. HerringtonJr.


Background: Because risk perceptions can affect protective behavior and protective behavior can affect risk perceptions, the relations between these 2 constructs are complex and incorrect tests often lead to invalid conclusions.Purpose: To discuss and carry out appropriate tests of 3 easily confused hypotheses: (a) the behavior motivation hypothesis (perceptions of personal risk cause people to take protective action), (b) the risk reappraisal hypothesis (when people take actions thought to be effective, they lower their risk perceptions), and (c) the accuracy hypothesis (risk perceptions accurately reflect risk behavior).Methods: Longitudinal study with an initial interview just after the Lyme disease vaccine was made publicly available and a follow-up interview 18 months later. Random sample of adult homeowners (N = 745) in 3 northeastern U.S. counties with high Lyme disease incidence. Lyme disease vaccination behavior and risk perception were assessed.Results: All 3 hypotheses were supported. Participants with higher initial risk perceptions were much more likely than those with lower risk perceptions to get vaccinated against Lyme disease (OR = 5.81, 95% CI 2.63-12.82, p < .001). Being vaccinated led to a reduction in risk perceptions, χ2(1, N = 745) = 30.90, p < .001, and people vaccinated correctly believed that their risk of future infection was lower than that of people not vaccinated (OR = .44, 95% CI .21-.91, p < .05).Conclusions: The behavior motivation hypothesis was supported in this longitudinal study, but the opposite conclusion (i.e., that higher risk led to less protective behavior) would have been drawn from an incorrect test based only on cross-sectional data. Health researchers should take care in formulating and testing risk-perception-behavior hypotheses.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Conner M, Norman, P:Predicting Health Behavior: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Weinstein ND: Testing four competing theories of health behavior.Health Psychology. 1993,12:324–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Sutton SR: Social-psychological approaches to understanding addictive behavior: Attitude-behavior and decision-making models.British Journal of Addiction. 1987,82:355–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Gerard M, Gibbons FX, Bushman BJ: Does perceived vulnerability to HIV motivate precautionary sexual behavior? A critical review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin. 1996,119:390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    van der Pligt J:Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behavior.British Journal of Health Psychology. 1998,2:1–14.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Ronis DL, Harel Y: Health beliefs and breast examination behaviors: Analysis of linear structural equations.Psychology and Health. 1989,3:259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Nicolich M: Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perception on precautionary behaviors.Psychology and Health. 1998,13:479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Weinstein ND, Nicolich M: Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors.Health Psychology. 1993,12:324–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al.: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1989,81:1879–1886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Lipkus IM, Biradavolu M, Fenn K, Keller P, Rimer BK: Informing women about their breast cancer risks: Truth and consequences.Health Communication. 2000,13:205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Recommendations for the use of Lyme disease vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1999,48:RR-7: 1–25.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Steere AC, Sikand VK, Meurice F, et al.: Vaccination against Lyme disease with recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A with adjuvant. Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Group.New England Journal of Medicine. 1998,339:209–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel T. Brewer
    • 1
  • Neil D. Weinstein
    • 1
  • Cara L. Cuite
    • 1
  • James E. HerringtonJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityPiscataway
  2. 2.Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUSA

Personalised recommendations