Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes
Background: Several studies have found significant crosssectional associations of perceived environmental attributes with physical activity behaviors. Prospective relations with environmental factors have been examined for vigorous activity, but not for the moderate-intensity activities that environmental and policy initiatives are being designed to influence.Purpose: To examine prospective associations of changes in perceptions of local environmental attributes with changes in neighborhood walking.Methods: Baseline and 10-week follow-up telephone interviews with 512 adults (49% men).Results: Men who reported positive changes in aesthetics and convenience were twice as likely to increase their walking. Women who reported positive changes in convenience were more than twice as likely to have increased their walking. There were contrasting findings for men and women who reported traffic as less of a problem: Men were 61% less likely to have increased walking; however, women were 76% more likely to have done so.Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine the possibly causal nature of such environment-behavior relations and to elucidate relevant gender differences. Such evidence will provide underpinnings for public health initiatives to increase participation in physical activity.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (1).U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
- (6).Bauman A, Owen N, Leslie E: Physical activity and health outcomes: Epidemiological evidence, national guidelines and pub- lic health initiatives.Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2000,57:229–232.Google Scholar
- (10).Bauman A, Sallis JF, Owen N: Environmental and policy measurement in physical activity research. In Welk G (ed),Physical Activity Assessment for Health-Related Research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2002, 241–251.Google Scholar
- (11).BakerE, BrennanLK, BrownsonR, HousemanRA: Measuring the determinants of physical activity in the community: Current and future directions.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71:146–158.Google Scholar
- (12).Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 403–424.Google Scholar
- (13).Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models of health behavior. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 462–484.Google Scholar
- (25).Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E, et al.: Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods.American Journal of Health Promotion (in press).Google Scholar
- (26).Sallis F, Saelens B: Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71:1–14.Google Scholar
- (27).Sallis JF, Owen N:Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
- (31).McGuire WJ: Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In Rice RE, Atkin CK (eds),Public Communication Campaigns. New-bury Park, CA: Sage, 1988, 43–65.Google Scholar
- (32).Donovan RJ, Owen N: Social marketing and population interventions. In Dishman R (ed),Advances in Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994, 249–290.Google Scholar