Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 60–67 | Cite as

Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes

  • Nancy Humpel
  • Alison L. Marshall
  • Eva Leslie
  • Adrian Bauman
  • Neville Owen


Background: Several studies have found significant crosssectional associations of perceived environmental attributes with physical activity behaviors. Prospective relations with environmental factors have been examined for vigorous activity, but not for the moderate-intensity activities that environmental and policy initiatives are being designed to influence.Purpose: To examine prospective associations of changes in perceptions of local environmental attributes with changes in neighborhood walking.Methods: Baseline and 10-week follow-up telephone interviews with 512 adults (49% men).Results: Men who reported positive changes in aesthetics and convenience were twice as likely to increase their walking. Women who reported positive changes in convenience were more than twice as likely to have increased their walking. There were contrasting findings for men and women who reported traffic as less of a problem: Men were 61% less likely to have increased walking; however, women were 76% more likely to have done so.Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine the possibly causal nature of such environment-behavior relations and to elucidate relevant gender differences. Such evidence will provide underpinnings for public health initiatives to increase participation in physical activity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Blair S, Kampert J, Kohl H, et al.: Influences of cardiores-piratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996,276:205–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Manson J, Hu F, Rich-Edwards J, et al.: A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women.New England Journal of Medicine. 1999,341:650–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Bauman A, Owen N: Physical activity of adult Australians: Epidemiological evidence and potential strategies for health gain.Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 1999,2:30–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Wanamethee S, Shaper A, Walker M: Changes in physical activity, mortality, and incidence of coronary heart disease in older men.The Lancet. 1998,351:1603–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Bauman A, Owen N, Leslie E: Physical activity and health outcomes: Epidemiological evidence, national guidelines and pub- lic health initiatives.Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2000,57:229–232.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Siegel P, Brackbill R, Heath GW: The epidemiology of walking for exercise: Implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups.American Journal of Public Health. 1995,85:706–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Morris J, Hardman A: Walking to health.Sports Medicine. 1997,23:306–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E: Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22:188–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Bauman A, Sallis JF, Owen N: Environmental and policy measurement in physical activity research. In Welk G (ed),Physical Activity Assessment for Health-Related Research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2002, 241–251.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    BakerE, BrennanLK, BrownsonR, HousemanRA: Measuring the determinants of physical activity in the community: Current and future directions.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71:146–158.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 403–424.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models of health behavior. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 462–484.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Owen N, Leslie E, Salmon J, Fotheringham MJ: Environmental determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior.Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2000,28:153–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA, Owen N: Towards a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: The role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators and confounders.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,23(2S):5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, et al.: Distance between homes and exercise related facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents.Public Health Reports. 1990,105:179–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, et al.: Associations between self-reported and objective physical environment factors anduse of a community rail-trail.Preventive Medicine. 2001,32:191–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Bauman A, Smith B, Stoker L, Bellew B, Booth ML: Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: Evidence of a “coastal effect.”.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1999,23:322–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Clavisi O, Leslie E: Social-cognitive and perceived environmental influences associated with physical activity in older Australians.Preventive Medicine. 2000,31:15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N: Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience, and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults.Preventive Medicine. 2001,33:434–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Hovell MF, Sallis JF, Hofstetter CR, et al.: Identifying correlates of walking for exercise: An epidemiologic prerequisite for physical activity promotion.Preventive Medicine. 1989,18:856–866.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Ross CE: Walking, exercising, and smoking: Does neighborhood matter?Social Science & Medicine. 2000,51: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Brownson RC, Houseman RA, Brown DR, et al.: Promoting physical activity in rural communities: Walking trail access, use, and effects.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000,18:235–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR: Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women.Preventive Medicine. 1992,21:237–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E, et al.: Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods.American Journal of Health Promotion (in press).Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Sallis F, Saelens B: Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000,71:1–14.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Sallis JF, Owen N:Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Bock BC, Marcus BH, Pinto BM, et al.: Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,23:79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Owen N, Bauman A: The descriptive epidemiology of a sedentary lifestyle in Australian adults.International Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,21:305–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, et al.: Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women.Health Psychology. 2000,19:354–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    McGuire WJ: Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In Rice RE, Atkin CK (eds),Public Communication Campaigns. New-bury Park, CA: Sage, 1988, 43–65.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Donovan RJ, Owen N: Social marketing and population interventions. In Dishman R (ed),Advances in Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994, 249–290.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Owen N, Bauman A, Booth M, Oldenburg B, Magnus P: Serial mass-media campaigns to promote physical activity: Reinforcing or redundant?American Journal of Public Health. 1995,85:244–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Bauman AE, Bellew B, Owen N, Vita P: Impact of an Australian mass-media campaign targeting physical activity in 1998.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001,21:41–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M: Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:379–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Humpel
    • 1
  • Alison L. Marshall
    • 2
  • Eva Leslie
    • 3
  • Adrian Bauman
    • 4
  • Neville Owen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WollongongAustralia
  2. 2.School of Human Movement StudiesUniversity of QueenslandAustralia
  3. 3.Cancer Prevention Research CentreUniversity of QueenslandAustralia
  4. 4.School of Community MedicineUniversity of NSWAustralia
  5. 5.Health and Productivity Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations