Need for recovery in the working population: Description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress

  • Nicole W. H. Jansen
  • IJmert Kant
  • Piet A. van den Brandt
Article

Abstract

This study examined the concept of need for recovery, that is the need to recuperate from work-induced fatigue, experienced after a day of work. The study explored the relationship between need for recovery from work, prolonged fatigue, and psychological distress in the working population. A cross-sectional study was carried out. Data of the Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work were used (n = 12,095). Some degree of need for recovery was found in nearly all employees. Need for recovery from work was associated with demographic, work-related, and health factors. Principal Components Analysis revealed obvious separation between need for recovery items and both fatigue items and psychological distress items, supporting the notion that need for recovery, fatigue, and psychological distress represent different underlying concepts. Although need for recovery, fatigue, and psychological distress were frequently comorbid, they also clearly occurred as separate entities.

Key words

need for recovery fatigue psychological distress work 

References

  1. Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D., Essink Bot, M. L., Fekkes, M., Sanderman, R., Sprangers, M. A., te Velde, A., & Verrips, E. (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1055–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bültmann, U., Kant, I. J., Vercoulen, J. H., Bleijenberg, G., & Swaen, G. M. (2000). Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 57(5), 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bültmann, U., De Vries, M., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bleijenberg, G., Vercoulen, J. H. M. M., & Kant, I. J. (2000). Measurement of prolongedfatigue at work in the Maastricht Cohort Study: Determination of a cutoff point. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(4), 411–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bültmann, U., Kant, I. J., Kasl, S. V., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., & Van den Brandt, P. A. (2001). Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: Psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(6), 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, A., & Cooper, R. E. (1992). Symptoms of acute and chronic fatigue. In A. P. Smith & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of human performance (Vol. 3) (pp. 289–339). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  6. David, A., Pelosi, A., McDonald, E., Stephens, D., Ledger, D., Rathbone, R., & Mann, A. (1990). Tired, weak, or in need of rest: Fatigue among general practice attenders. British Medical Journal, 301(6762), 1199–1202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vries-Griever, A. H. G. (1992). Evenwicht tussen werkdruk en herstel bij afwijkende werktijden. Uitgangspunten voor dienstroosterplanning [Balancing work load and recovery in deviating working hours. Basic principles of rota planning]. Groningen/Utrecht: Nationaal Ziekenhuisinstituut.Google Scholar
  8. Depue, R. A., & Monroe, S. M. (1986). Conceptualization and measurement of human disorder in life stress research: The problem of chronic disturbance. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 36–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galambos, N. L., & Walters, B. J. (1992). Work hours, schedule inflexibility, and stress in dual-earner spouses. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24(3), 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban stress: Experiments onnoise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1991). The user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  12. Gründemann, R. W. M., Smulders, P. W. G., & De Winter, C. R. (1993). Handleiding Vragenlijst Arbeid en Gezondheid [Manual, Questionnaire on work and health]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Houtman, I. (1995). Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire. In: NIOSH/APA conference on Stress, Work, and Health. Washington DC: APA.Google Scholar
  14. Janssen, N., Nijhuis, F. J. N., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M. (2001). The Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work: non-response analysis in a health survey. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  15. Kant, I. J., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Schröer, C. A. P., Nijhuis, F. J. N., Van Schayck, C. P., Van den Elzen, H. J., & Swaen, G. M. H. (2000). De Maastrichtse Cohort Studie naar langdurige psychische vermoeidheid in de arbeidssituatie [The Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work]. Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfsen Verzekeringsgeneeskunde, 8(8), 226–232.Google Scholar
  16. Karasek, R. A. (1985). The Job Content Questionnaire and user’s guide (version 1.1). Los Angeles: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  17. Kirk, K. M., Hickie, I. B., & Martin, N. G. (1999). Fatigue as related to anxiety and depression in a community-based sample of twins aged over 50. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34(2), 85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koeter, M. W. J., & Ormel, J. (1991). General Health Questionnaire, Handleiding Nederlandse bewerking [General Health Questionnaire, Manual Dutch version]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, G., & Wessely, S. (1992). The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 46(2), 92–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loge, J. H., Ekeberg, O. I., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: Normative data and associations. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 45(1), 53–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe, C. J., Thomas, K. J., Brazier, J. E., & Coleman, P. (1996). Measuring the mental health status of a population: A comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MHI-5). The British Journal of Psychiatry; The Journal of Mental Science, 169(4), 516–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meijman, T. (1989). Mentale belasting en werkstress. Een arbeidspsychologische benadering. [Mental strain and workstress. An I/O psychology approach]. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  23. Melamed, S., & Bruhis, S. (1996). The effects of chronic industrial noise exposure on urinary cortisol, fatigue and irritability: A controlled field experiment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 38(3), 252–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milosevic, S. (1997). Drivers’ fatigue studies. Ergonomics, 40(3), 381–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Politi, P. L., Piccinelli, M., & Wilkinson, G. (1994). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among young males in Italy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90(6), 432–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saito, K. (1999). Measurement of fatigue in industries. Industrial Health, 37(2), 134–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute. (1989). SAS version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Schmitz, N., Kruse, J., & Tress, W. (1999). Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in a German primary care sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100(6), 462–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schröer, C.A.P. (1997). De toename van arbeidsongeschiktheid wegens psychische aandoeningen [The increase of work disability due to mental disorders]. Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfsen Verzekeringsgeneeskunde, 5(1), 16–23.Google Scholar
  30. Sluiter, J. K., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., Van der Beek, A. J., & Meijman, T. F. (2001). The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50, 29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sluiter, J. K., Van der Beek, A. J., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (1999). The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: A study on coach drivers. Ergonomics, 42(4), 573–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SPSS. (1998). Base 9.0 for Windows user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Van der Beek, A. J., Meijman, T. F., Frings-Dresen, M. H., Kuiper, J. I., & Kuiper, S. (1995). Lorry drivers’ work stress evaluated by catecholamines excreted in urine. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 52(7), 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Veldhoven, M., & Broersen, J. P. J. (1999). Psychosociale arbeidsbelasting en werkstress in Nederland [Psychosocial work pressure and jobstress in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: SKB.Google Scholar
  35. Van Veldhoven, M., & Meijman, T. F. (1994). Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: de vragenlijst beleving en beoordeling van de arbeid (VBBA) [The measurement of psychosocial job demands with a questionnaire (VBBA)]. Amsterdam: NIA.Google Scholar
  36. Vercoulen, J. H., Swanink, C. M., Fennis, J. F., Galama, J. M., Van der Meer, J. W., & Bleijenberg, G. (1994). Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(5), 383–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wessely, S. (1990). Chronic fatigue and myalgia syndromes.In N. Sartorius & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Psychological disorders in general medical settings (pp. 82–97). Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole W. H. Jansen
    • 1
  • IJmert Kant
    • 1
  • Piet A. van den Brandt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyMaastricht UniversityMD MaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations