Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 104–123 | Cite as

Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports

  • Kerstin E. E. Schroder
  • Michael P. Carey
  • Peter A. Vanable


Assessing sexual behavior with self-report is essential to research on a variety of health topics, including pregnancy and infertility, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual health and functioning. Recent methodological research has provided new insights regarding the accuracy of self-reports of sexual behavior. We review these studies, paying particular attention to a promising new development: the use of computer-assisted assessments. The collection of sexual risk behavior data with computers has increased dramatically in recent years, but little is known about the accuracy of such assessments. We summarize the evidence, discuss methodological issues that arise in studies evaluating the accuracy of self-reports, and offer recommendations for future research.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ: Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior.Psychological Bulletin. 1990,108:339–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Catania JA, Binson D, Dolcini MM, et al.: Risk factors for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases and prevention practices among US heterosexual adults: Changes from 1990 to 1992.American Journal of Public Health. 1995,85:1492–1499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Weinhardt LS, Forsyth AD, Carey MP, Jaworski BC, Durant LE: Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-re-lated sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice.Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1998,27:155–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Kauth MR, St. Lawrence JS, Kelly JA: Reliability of retrospective assessments of sexual HIV risk behavior: A comparison of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-reports.AIDS Education & Prevention. 1991,3:207–214.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA, Gordon CM, Weinhardt LS: Assessing sexual risk behaviour with the timeline followback (TLFB) approach: Continued development and psychometric evaluation with psychiatric outpatients.International Journal of STD and AIDS. 2001,12:365–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    McFarlane M, St. Lawrence JS: Adolescents’ recall of sexual behavior: Consistency of self-report and effect of variations in recall duration.Journal of Adolescent Health. 1999,25:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Jaccard J, McDonald R, Wan CK, Dittus PJ, Quinlan S: The accuracy of self-reports of condom use and sexual behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002,32:1863–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Jaccard J, Wan CK: A paradigm for studying the accuracy of self-reports of risk behavior relevant to AIDS: Empirical perspectives on stability, recall bias, and transitory influences.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1995,25:1831–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Tourangeau R, Smith TW: Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and questioncontext.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996,60:275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Tourangeau R, Smith TW: Collecting sensitive information with different modes of data collection. International Conference on Computer-Assisted Survey Information Collection. San Antonio, TX: 1996.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Turner CF, Miller HG, Smith TK, Cooley PC, Rogers SM: Telephone audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (T-ACASI) and survey measurements of sensitive behaviors: Preliminary results. In Banks R, Fairgrieve J, Gerrard L, Orchard T, Payne C, West-lake A (eds),Survey and Statistical Computing 1996. Chesham Bucks, UK: Association for Survey Computing, 1996, 121–130.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Weinhardt LS, Carey MP, Maisto SA, et al.: Reliability of the timeline follow-back sexual behavior interview.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:25–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Durant LE, Carey MP: Self-administered questionnaires versus face-to-face interviews in assessing sexual behavior in young women.Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2000,29:309–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Carballo-Dieguez A, Remien RH, Dolezal C, Wagner G: Reliability of sexual behavior self-reports in male couples of discordant HIV status.Journal of Sex Research. 1999,36:152–158.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    McKinnon K, Cournos F, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, et al.: Reliability of sexual risk behavior interviews with psychiatric patients.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1993,150:972–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Schroder KEE, Carey MP, Vanable PA: Methodological chal lenges in research on sexual risk behavior: I. Item content, scaling, and data analytical options.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,26:76–103. [this issue]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Downey L, Ryan R, Roffman R, Kulich M: How could I forget? Inaccurate memories of sexually intimate moments.Journal of Sex Research. 1995,32:177–191.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Ramjee G, Weber AE, Morar NS: Recording sexual behavior:Comparison of recall questionnaires with a coital diary.Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 1999,26:374–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Loftus EF, Klinger MR, Smith KD, Fiedler J: A tale of two questions: Benefits of asking more than one question.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1990,54:330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Boekeloo BO, Schiavo L, Rabin DL, et al.: Self-reports of HIV risk factors by patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic: Audio vs written questionnaires.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:754–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, et al.: Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology.Science. 1998, May:867–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Des Jarlais DC, Paone D, Milliken J, et al.: Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomised trial.The Lancet. 1999,353:1657–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Gribble JN, Miller HG, Cooley PC, et al.: The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men.Substance Use and Misuse. 2000,35:869–890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Paperny DMN: Computerized health assessment and education for adolescent HIV and STD prevention in health care settings and schools.Health Education and Prevention. 1997,24:54–70.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, et al.: A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing.AIDS Education and Prevention. 2000,12:199–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Dowling-Guyer S, Johnson ME, Fisher DG, et al.: Reliability of drug users’ self-reported HIV risk behavior and validity of self-reported drug use.Assessment. 1994,1:383–392.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    McLaws ML, Oldenburg B, Ross MW, Cooper DA: Sexual be havior in AIDS-related research: Reliability and validity of recall and diary measures.Journal of Sex Research. 1990,27:265–281.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Saltzman SP, Stoddard AM, McCusker J, Moon MW, Mayer KH: Reliability of self-reported sexual behavior risk factors for HIV infection in homosexual men.Public Health Reports. 1987,102:692–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Tourangeau R, Smith TW, Rasinski KA: Motivation to report sensitive behaviors on surveys: Evidence from a bogus pipeline experiment.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1997,27:209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Gerbert B, Bronstone A, Pantilat S, et al.: When asked, patients tell: Disclosure of sensitive health-risk behaviors.Medical Care. 1999,37:104–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Durant LE, Carey MP, Schroder KEE: Effects of anonymity, gender, and erotophilia on the quality of data obtained from self-reports of socially sensitive data.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2002,25:438–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Tourangeau R, Rasinski K, Jobe JB, Smith TW, Pratt WF: Sources of error in a survey on sexual behavior.Journal of Official Statistics. 1997,13:341–367.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Locke SE, Kowaloff HB, Hoff RG, et al.: Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992,268:1301–1305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Locke SE, Kowaloff HB, Hoff RG, et al.: Computer interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.MD Computing. 1994,11:26–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies.American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000,152: 99–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Robinson R, West R: A comparison of computer and questionnaire methods of history-taking in a genito-urinary clinic.Psychology and Health. 1992,6:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Paperny DMN, Aono JY, Lehman RM, Hammar SL, Risser J: Computer-assisted detection and intervention in adolescent high- riskhealth behaviors.Journal of Pediatrics. 1990,116:456–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    O’Reilly JM, Hubbard ML, Lessler JT, Biemer PP, Turner CF: Audio and video computer-assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection.Journal of Official Statistics. 1994,10:197–214.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Turner CF, Ku L, Sonenstein FL, Pleck JH: Impact of ACASI on reporting of male-male sexual contacts: Preliminary results from the 1995 National Survey of Adolescent Males. In Warnecke RB (ed),Health Survey Research Methods. Hyatts-ville, MD: National CenterforHealth Statistics, 1996, 171–176.Google Scholar
  40. (40).
    Turner CF, Miller HG, Rogers SM: Survey measurement of sexual behavior: Problems and progress. In Bancroft J (ed),Researching Sexual Behavior: Methodological Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997, 37–60.Google Scholar
  41. (41).
    Coxon AP: Parallel accounts? Discrepancies between self-report (diary) and recall (questionnaire) measures of the same sexual behaviour.AIDS Care. 1999,11:221–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Leigh BC, Gillmore MR, Morrison DM: Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998,51:119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Morrison DM, Leigh BC, Gillmore MR: Daily data collection: A comparison of three methods.Journal of Sex Research. 1999,36:76–81.Google Scholar
  44. (44).
    Reading AE: A comparison of the accuracy and reactivity of methods of monitoring male sexual behavior.Journal of Behavioral Assessment. 1983,5:11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Berk R, Abramson PR, Okami P: Sexual activities as told in surveys. In Abramson PR, Pinkerton SD (eds),Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995, 371–386.Google Scholar
  46. (46).
    Fortenberry JD, Cecil H, Zimet GD, Orr DP: Concordance between self-report questionnaires and coital diaries for sexual behaviors of adolescent women with sexually transmitted infections. In Bancroft J (ed),Researching Sexual Behavior: Methodological Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997, 237–249.Google Scholar
  47. (47).
    Midanik LT: Validity of self-reported alcohol use: A literature review and assessment.British Journal of Addiction. 1988,83:1019–1030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Searles JS, Perrine MW, Mundt JC, Helzer JE: Self-report of drinking using touch-tone telephone: Extending the limits of reliable daily contact.Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1995,56:375–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Stone A A, Schwartz JE, Neale JM, et al.: A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retro spective recall.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998,74:1670–1680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. (50).
    Fishbein M, Pequegnat W: Evaluating AIDS prevention interventions using behavioral and biological outcome measures.Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2000,27:101–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. (51).
    Tourangeau R, Jobe JB, Pratt WF, Rasinski K: Design and results of the Women’s Health Study.NIDA Research Monograph. 1997,167:344–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. (52).
    Hoppe MJ, Gillmore MR, Valadez DL, et al.: The relative costs and benefits of telephone interviews versus self-administered diaries for daily data collection.Evaluation Review. 2000,24:102–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. (53).
    Minnis AM, Padian NS: Reliability of adolescents’ self-reported sexual behavior: A comparison of two diary methodologies.Journal of Adolescent Health. 2001,28:394–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Jeannin A, Konings E, Dubois-Arber F, Landert C, Van Melle G: Validity and reliability in reporting sexual partners and condom use in a Swiss population survey.European Journal of Epidemiology. 1998,14:139–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. (55).
    Kalichman SC, Kelly JA: Priming effects of HIV risk assessments on related perceptions and behavior: An experimental field study.AIDS and Behavior. 1997,1:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    Konings E, Bantebya G, Carael M, Bagenda D, Mertens T: Validating population surveys for the measurement of HIV/STD prevention indicators.AIDS. 1995,9:375–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. (57).
    McElrath K, Chitwood DD, Griffin DK, Comerford M: The consistency of self-reported HIV risk behavior among inj ection drug users.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:1965–1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. (58).
    Needle R, Fisher DG, Weatherby N, et al.: Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1995,9:242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. (59).
    Sohler N, Colson PW, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Susser E: Reliability of self-reports about sexual risk behavior for HIV among homeless men with severe mental illness.Psychiatric Services. 2000,51:814–816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. (60).
    Stone VE, Catania JA, Binson D: Measuring change in sexual behavior: Concordance between survey measures.Journal of Sex Research. 1999,36:102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. (61).
    Van Duynhoven YT, Nagelkerke NJ, Van De Laar MJ: Reliability of self-reported sexual histories: Test-retest and interpartnercomparison in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 1999,26:33–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin E. E. Schroder
    • 1
  • Michael P. Carey
    • 1
  • Peter A. Vanable
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Health and BehaviorSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations