Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 59–68

Correlates of self-perceptions of spirituality in American adults

  • Leila Shahabi
  • Lynda H. Powell
  • Marc A. Musick
  • Kenneth I. Pargament
  • Carl E. Thoresen
  • David Williams
  • Lynn Underwood
  • Marcia A. Ory
Article

Abstract

To advance knowledge in the study of spirituality and physical health, we examined sociodemographic, behavioral, and attitudinal correlates of self-perceptions of spirituality. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 1,422 adult respondents to the 1998 General Social Survey. They were asked, among other things, to rate themselves on the depth of their spirituality and the depth of their religiousness. Results indicated that, after adjustment for religiousness, self-perceptions of spirituality were positively correlated with being female (r = .07, p < .01), having a higher education (r = .12, p < .001), and having no religion (r = .10, p < .001) and inversely correlated with age (r = -.06, p < .05) and being Catholic (r = -.08, p < .01). After adjustment for these sociodemographic factors, self-perceptions of spirituality were associated with high levels of religious or spiritual activities (range in correlations = .12–.38, all p < .001), low cynical mistrust, and low political conservatism (both r = -.08, p < .01). The population was divided into 4 groups based on their self-perceptions of degree of spirituality and degree of religiousness. The spiritual and religious group had a higher frequency of attending services, praying, meditating, reading the Bible, and daily spiritual experience than any of the other 3 groups (all differences p < .05) and had less distress and less mistrust than the religious-only group (p < .05 for both). However, they were also more intolerant than either of the nonreligious groups (p < .05 for both) and similar on intolerance to the religious-only group. We conclude that sociodemographic factors could confound any observed association between spirituality and health and should be controlled. Moreover, individuals who perceive themselves to be both spiritual and religious may be at particularly low risk for morbidity and mortality based on their good psychological status and ongoing restorative activities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    McCullough ME, Hoyt WT, Larson DB, Koenig HG, Thoresen CE: Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review.Health Psychology. 2000,19:211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Powell LH, Shahabi L, Thoresen CE: Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health. Society for Epidemiologic Research Annual Meeting. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: 2001.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Allport GW, Ross JM: Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967,5:432–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Spilka B, McIntosh DN: Religion and spirituality: The known and the unknown. American Psychological Association Annual Meeting. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: 1996.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Woods TE, Ironson GH: Religion and spirituality in the face of illness.Journal of Health Psychology. 1999,4:393–412.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Zinnbauer BJ, Pargament KI, Cole B, et al.: Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1997,36:549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Davidson J: Glock’s model of religious commitment: Assessing some different approaches and results.Review of Religious Research. 1975,16:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Davis JA, Smith TW:General Social Surveys, 1972–1991. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group:Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/NationalInstitute of Aging Working Group. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Roof WC, McKinney W:American Mainline Religion: Its Changing Shape and Future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Demaris A, Yang R: Race, alienation, and interpersonal mistrust.Sociological Spectrum. 1994,14:327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Fylkesnes K, Forde OH: Determinants and dimensions involved in self-evaluation of health.Social Science and Medicine. 1992,35:271–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Manderbacka K, Lundberg O, Martikainen P: Do risk factors and health behaviors contribute to self-ratings of health?Social Science and Medicine. 1999,48:1713–1720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Idler EL: Self-assessed health and mortality: A review of studies. In Maes S, Leventhal H, Johnston M (eds),International Review of Health Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1992, 33–54.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    McCallum J, Shadbolt M, Wang D: Self-rated health and survival: A 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:1100–1105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Dasbach EJ, Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE: Self-rated health and mortality in people with diabetes.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:1775–1779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Moller L, Kristensen TS, Hollnagel H: Self-rated health as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Copenhagen, Denmark.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1996,50:423–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Ellison CG, Musick MA: Southern intolerance: A Fundamentalist effect?Social Forces. 1993,72:379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    United States Department of Commerce: U.S. 1990 Census data [online]. Available from http://www.census.govGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Gallup Organization: 2000 Gallup poll [online]. Available from http://www.gallup.comGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Hood RW, Spilka B, Hunsberger B, Gorsuch R:The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. New York: Guilford, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Hayes BC: Religious independents within Western industrialized nations: A socio-demographic profile.Sociology of Religion. 2000,61:191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Roof WC:A Generation of Seekers: The Spiritual Journeys of the Baby Boom Generation. San Francisco: Harper, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Levin J: How religion influences morbidity and health: Reflections on natural history, salutogenesis and host resistance.Social Science and Medicine. 1996,43:849–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, et al.: A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health.Psychological Bulletin. 1996,119:322–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Allison TG, Williams DE, Miller TD, et al.: Medical and economic costs of psychologic distress in patients with coronary artery disease.Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1995,70:734–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Denollet J, Brutsaert DL: Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with a decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction.Circulation. 1998,97:167–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leila Shahabi
    • 1
  • Lynda H. Powell
    • 1
  • Marc A. Musick
    • 2
  • Kenneth I. Pargament
    • 3
  • Carl E. Thoresen
    • 4
  • David Williams
    • 5
  • Lynn Underwood
    • 6
  • Marcia A. Ory
    • 7
  1. 1.Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical CenterDepartment of Preventive MedicineChicago
  2. 2.University of Texas-AustinUSA
  3. 3.Bowling Green State UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Stanford UniversityUSA
  5. 5.University of MichiganUSA
  6. 6.Fetzer InstituteUSA
  7. 7.National Institute on AgingUSA

Personalised recommendations