Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 133–138

Distress and disease status among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Roles of coping styles and perceived responses from support providers

  • Kenneth W. Griffin
  • Ronald Friend
  • Alan T. Kaell
  • Ronald S. Bennett


Previous research has shown that social support can have a beneficial impact on coping processes and psychological adjustment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The association of individual coping styles and perceived responses from others to one’s pain episodes with patients’ distress and disease status over time was investigated. The sample consisted of 42 middle-aged patients with RA who were predominantly White (98%), female (64%), and married (88%). Participants completed surveys and their rheumatologist completed clinical assessments of patient disease status at 2 time points over a 9-month period. Although punishing responses from others (e.g., getting irritated or angry when the patient is in pain) were perceived as relatively infrequent, they were associated with a patient coping style of focusing on and venting of negative emotion as well as elevated negative affect (NA). Findings also indicated that those who perceived punishing responses from close others and coped by venting negative emotions reported increased NA over time and were rated by their rheumatologist as having more severe RA disease status over time. Implications for psychosocial intervention and directions for future research are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Affleck G, Pfeiffer CA, Tennen J, Fifield J: Social support and psychological adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis: Quantitative and qualitative findings.Arthritis Care and Research. 1988,1:71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Fitzpatrick R, Newman S, Lamb R, Shipley M: Social relationships and psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis.Social Science and Medicine. 1988,27:399–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Goodenow C, Reisine ST, Grady KE: Quality of social support and associated social and psychological functioning in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychology. 1990,9:266–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Penninx BW, van Tilburg T, Deeg DJ, et al.: Direct and buffer effects of social support and personal coping resources in individuals with arthritis.Social Science and Medicine. 1997,44:393–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Brown GK, Wallston KA, Nicassio PM: Social support and depression in rheumatoid arthritis: A one-year prospective study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1989,19:1146–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Affleck G, Tennen H, Urrows S, Higgins P: Person and contextual features of daily stress reactivity: Individual differences in relations of undesirable daily events with mood disturbance and chronic pain intensity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,66:329–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Bolwijn PH, van Santen-Hoeufft MH, Baars HM, van der Linden S: Social network characteristics in fibromyalgia or rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Care and Research. 1994,7:46–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Manne SL, Zautra AJ: Spouse criticism and support: Their association with coping and psychological adjustment among women with rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989,56:608–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Revenson TA, Majerovitz SD: Spouses’ support provision to chronically ill patients.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1990,7:575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Kraaimaat FW, Van Dam-Baggen CM, Bijlsma JW: Depression, anxiety, and social support in rheumatoid arthritic women with and without a spouse.Psychology and Health. 1995,10:387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Ward MM, Leigh JP: Marital status and the progression of functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1993,36:581–588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Revenson TA, Schiaffino KN, Majerovitz S, Gibofsky A: Social support as a double-edged sword: The relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients.Social Science and Medicine. 1991,33:807–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Hatchett L, Friend R, Symister P, Wadhwa N: Interpersonal expectations, social support, and adjustment to chronic illness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,73:560–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Kerns RD, Haythornthwaite J, Southwick S, Giller EL: The role of marital interaction in chronic pain and depressive symptom severity.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1990,34:401–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Kerns RD, Weiss LH: Family influences on the course of chronic illness: A cognitive-behavioral transactional model.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:116–121.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Nicassio PM, Radojevic V, Schoenfeld-Smith K, Dwyer K: The contribution of family cohesion and the pain-coping process to depressive symptoms in fibromyalgia.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,17:349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Arnett FC, Edworthy S, Block DA, et al.: The 1987 revised ARA criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1987,30:S17.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,54:1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK: Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989,56:267–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE: The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI).Pain. 1985,23:345–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Steinbrocker O, Traeger CH, Balterman RC: Therapeutic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1949,140:659–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Anderson KO, Bradley LA, Young LD, McDaniel LK, Wise CM: Rheumatoid arthritis: Review of psychological factors related to etiology, effects, and treatment.Psychological Bulletin. 1985,98:358–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Young LD: Psychological factors in rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992,60:619–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Blalock SJ, DeVellis BM, Holt K, Hahn PM: Coping with rheumatoid arthritis: Is one problem the same as another?Health Education Quarterly. 1993,20:119–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Zautra AJ, Burleson MH, Matt KS, Roth S, Burrows L: Interpersonal stress, depression, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients.Health Psychology. 1994,13:139–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Seeman TE: Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration.Annals of Epidemiology. 1996,6:442–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    DeVellis BM: The physiological impact of arthritis: Prevalence of depression.Arthritis Care and Research. 1995,8:284–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Revenson TA, Majerovitz SD: The effects of chronic illness on the spouse: Social resources as stress buffers.Arthritis Care and Research. 1991,4:63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth W. Griffin
    • 1
  • Ronald Friend
    • 2
  • Alan T. Kaell
    • 2
  • Ronald S. Bennett
    • 2
  1. 1.Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York
  2. 2.State University of New York at Stony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations