Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention

  • Beth C. Bock
  • Bess H. Marcus
  • Bernardine M. Pinto
  • LeighAnn H. Forsyth


This study examined predictors of exercise maintenance following completion of a physical activity intervention. Sedentary adults recruited through newspaper advertisements were randomly assigned to receive either (a) a motivation-matched intervention with feedback reports that were individually tailored (IT) to psychological variables from social cognitive theory and the Transtheoretical Model via computer expert system, or (b) a standard, print-based intervention (ST). The intervention phase of the study included mailed assessments and intervention materials at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. An assessment-only follow-up was conducted 6 months after the end of the intervention (Month 12). Participants were assessed for current physical activity participation, motivational readiness for physical activity, a number of psychological constructs posited to influence participation in physical activity (e.g., self-efficacy), and current affect. Significantly more participants in the IT condition met or exceeded exercise participation goals at the end of the intervention period and maintained, this level of physical activity through the Month 12 follow-up compared to ST participants. Prospective analyses revealed significant differences in several psychological constructs both at program entry (baseline) and the end of the intervention period between individuals who maintained their physical activity participation through Month 12 and those who did not. Results suggest that the maintenance of physical activity following the end of an active intervention program, may be influenced by attitudes and behaviors acquired along with increased participation in physical activity, as well as by preexisting characteristics that individuals bring into treatment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Bouchard C, Shephard R, Stephens T: Consensus statement. In Bouchard C, Shephard R, Stephens T (eds),Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, et al.: Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American College of Sports Medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,271:402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Marcus BH, Rossi JS, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Abrams DB: The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample.Health Psychology. 1992,11:386–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Dishman RK: Increasing and maintaining exercise and physical activity.Behavior Therapy. 1991,22:345–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Martin JE, Dubbert PM: Adherence to exercise.Exercise and Sport Science Reviews. 1985,13:131–167.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Janis IL, Mann L:Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Collier Macrmllan, 1977, 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Marcus BH, Simkin LR: The stages of exercise behavior.The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1993,33:83–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Marcus BH, Emmons KM, Simkin-Silverman L, et al.: Evaluation of motivationally-tailored versus standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1998,12:138–146.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, et al.: Efficacy of individualized, motivationally tailored physical activity intervention.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:174–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Bock BC, Albrecht AE, Traficante R, et al.: Predictors of exercise adherence following cardiac rehabilitation.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1997,4:60–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS: Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change.Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport. 1992,63:60–66.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Blair SN, Powell KE, Bazzarre TL, et al.: Physical inactivity, Workshop V.Circulation. 1993,88:1402–1405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Marcus BH, Banspach SW, Lefebvre RL, et al.: Using the stages of change model to increase the adoption of physical activity among community participants.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1992,6:424–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Marcus BH, Goldstein MG, Jette A, et al.: Training physicians to conduct physical activity counseling.Preventive Medicine. 1997,26:382–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al.: Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: A randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999.281:327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Marcus BH, Dubbert P, Forsyth LH, et al.: Physical activity behavior change: Issues in adoption and maintenance.Health Psychology. 2000,19:32–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    American College of Sports Medicine: Position stand on the recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1990,22:265–274.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Sallis JF, Haskell W, Wood P, et al.: Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project.American Journal of Epidemiology 1985,121:91–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS: Assessing motivational readiness and decision-making for exercise.Health Psychology. 1992,11:257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Marcus BH, Simkin LR, Rossi JS, Pinto BM: Longitudinal shifts in employees’ stages and processes of exercise behavior change.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996,10:195–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff, BA, Locke BZ: Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1977,106:203–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988,54:1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    American Heart Association:Walking for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    American Heart Association:Swimming for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    American Heart Association:Cycling for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    American Heart Association:Exercise Diary. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1993.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Sallis JF, Johnson MF, Calfas KJ, Caparosa S, Nichols JF: Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport 1997,68:345–351.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    McAuley E, Courneya K.S, Rudolph DL, Lox CL: Enhancing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and females.Preventive Medicine. 1994,23:498–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR: Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women.Preventive Medicine. 1992,21:237–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Marcus BH, Cheng Y, Dunn AL, Blair SN: Maintaining activity: An epidemiological perspective. Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine. Seattle, WA: 1999.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Marcus BH, Pinto BM, Simkin LR, Audrain JE, Taylor ER: Application of theoretical models to exercise behavior among employed women.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1994,9:49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Mayer JA, Jermanovich A, Wright BL, et al.: Changes in health behaviors of older adults: The San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project.Preventive Medicine. 1994,23:127–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Cardinal BJ: Predicting cardiorespiratory fitness without exercise testing in epidemiologic studies: A concurrent validity study.Journal of Epidemiology. 1996,6:31–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Powell KE, Thompson PD, Caspersen CJ, Kendrick JS: Physical activity and the incidence of coronary heart disease.Annual Review of Public Health. 1987,8:254–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Gore CJ: Relationship between a 14-day recall measure of leisure-time physical activity and a submaximal test of physical work capacity in a population sample of Australian adults.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport. 1996,67:221–227.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Kohl HW, Blair SN, Paffenbarger RS, Macera CA, Kronenfeld JJ: A mail survey of physical activity habits as related to measured physical fitness.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988,126:1228–1239.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Matt GE, Garcia M, Primicias WW, Frericks L, De Faria F: Exploring biases in self-reported exercising behavior heuristics based on recency, frequency, and preference.Perceptual & Motor Skills. 1999,88:126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    King AC, Blair SN, Bild D, et al.: Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1992,24(Suppl.):S221-S236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Bock BC, Niaura R, Fontes A, Bock F: Acceptability of computer assessments in minority and underserved smokers.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1999,13:299–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth C. Bock
    • 1
  • Bess H. Marcus
    • 1
  • Bernardine M. Pinto
    • 1
  • LeighAnn H. Forsyth
    • 2
  1. 1.Brown Centers for Behavioral and Preventive MedicineThe Miriam HospitalProvidence
  2. 2.Cleveland State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations