Skip to main content
Log in

An improvement on the papadakis covariate to account for spatial variation

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Papadakis covariate is commonly used to account for spatial variation in agricultural field experiments. However, it is calculated from the observed yield, and is affected by unexpected land discontinuity. To address this problem, we propose two extensions. First, we introduce a kriged covariate which is based on spatial information in the field. Two covariates, namely the kriged residual and the kriged Papadakis residual, are discussed. The second extension is a modification of the conventional Papadakis covariate that assigns equal weight to neighboring plots, regardless of their distance from the point of interest. The proposed covariate (a modified Papadakis covariate) assigns different weights to plot yield according to their spatial position. The proposed extensions are compared to the conventional Papadakis covariate using field data from Ethiopia. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of these covariates. The number of neighbors needed to compute the proposed covariate are determined by the range of the variogram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A. C. (1969), “The Use of Residuals as a Concomitant Variable,” Biometrika, 56, 33–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1938), “The Approximate Recovery of Information from Field Experiments with Large Blocks,” Journal of Agricultural Science, 28, 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1978), “Nearest Neighbor Models in the Analysis of Field Experiments” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 40, 147–174.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, A. U., Mulla, D. J., Koehler, F. E., and Gurmani, A. H. (1991), “Identifying and Removing Spatial Correlation from Field Experiments,” Journal of Soil Science Society of America, 55, 1523–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownie, C., Bowman, D. T., and Burton, J. W. (1993), “Estimating Spatial Variation in Analysis of Data from Yield Trials: A Comparison of Methods,” Agronomy Journal, 85, 1244–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownie, C., and Gumpertz, M. L. (1997), “Validity of Spatial Analyses for Large Field Trials,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 1–23.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T. M., and Webster, R. (1980), “Optimal Interpolation and Isoarithmetic Mapping of Soil Properties. I. The Semi-variogram and Punctual Kriging. II. Block Kriging,” Joural of Soil Science, 31, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. B. (1978), “Spatial Variation of Sand Content and pHWithin Single Contiguous Delineations of Two Soil Mapping Units,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 460–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1926), “The Arrangement of Field Experiments,” Journal of Ministry of Agriculture, England, 33, 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1935), The Design of Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotway, C. A., and Stroup, W. W. (1997), “A Generalized Linear Models Approach to Spatial Data Analysis and Prediction,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 157–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G. (1983), “Nonparametric Estimation of Spatial Distributions,” Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 15, 445–468.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J. (1978), Mining Geostatitstics, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, R. A., and Howes, C.W. (1981), “The Use of Neighboring Plot Values in the Analysis of Variety Trials,” Applied Statistics, 30, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, J. S. (1937), “Methode Statistique Pour des Experiences Sur. Champ. Bull. Inst.,” Amel. Plantes a Salonique, No. 23.

  • Pearce, S. C., and Moore, C. S. (1976), “Reduction of Experimental Error in Perennial Crops Using Adjustments by Neighboring Plots,” Experimental Agriculture, 12, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1996), SAS/STAT Software:Changes and Enhancements through release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., and Wall, M. M. (2003), “Incorporating Parameter Uncertainity into Prediction Intervals for Spatial Data Modeled via a Parametric Variogram,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. N., Eckert, S. R., Hancock, T.W., and Mayo, O. (1983), “Nearest Neighbor (NN) Analysis of Field Experiments” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 45, 151–211.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. M. (1952), “Experimental Designs for Serially Correlated Observations,” Biometrika, 39, 151–167.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, R. S., Fox, R. L., and Uehara, G. (1982), “Geostatistical Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties of Large Land Areas. I. Semivariogram, II, Kriging,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46, 1028–1037.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taye, G., Njuho, P. An improvement on the papadakis covariate to account for spatial variation. JABES 12, 397–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571107X227946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571107X227946

Key Words

Navigation