Skip to main content
Log in

Two-stage sequential sampling: A neighborhood-free adaptive sampling procedure

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing an efficient sampling scheme for a rare and clustered population is a challenging area of research. Adaptive cluster sampling, which has been shown to be viable for such a population, is based on sampling a neighborhood of units around a unit that meets a specified condition. However, the edge units produced by sampling neighborhoods have proven to limit the efficiency and applicability of adaptive cluster sampling. We propose a sampling design that is adaptive in the sense that the final sample depends on observed values, but it avoids the use of neighborhoods and the sampling of edge units. Unbiased estimators of population total and its variance are derived using Murthy’s estimator. The modified two-stage sampling design is easy to implement and can be applied to a wider range of populations than adaptive cluster sampling. We evaluate the proposed sampling design by simulating sampling of two real biological populations and an artificial population for which the variable of interest took the value either 0 or 1 (e.g., indicating presence and absence of a rare event). We show that the proposed sampling design is more efficient than conventional sampling in nearly all cases. The approach used to derive estimators (Murthy’s estimator) opens the door for unbiased estimators to be found for similar sequential sampling designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, J. A., and Manly, B. F. J. (1998), “Restricted Adaptive Cluster Sampling,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 5, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, M. C. (2000), “A Review of Quadrat-Based Sampling of Rare, Geographically Clustered Populations,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 5, 168–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003), “Adaptive Two-Stage One-per-Stratum Sampling,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10, 43–60.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1977), Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Francis R. I. C. C. (1984), “An Adaptive Strategy for Stratified Random Trawl Surveys,” New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 18, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1945), “On a Method of Estimating Frequencies,” Biometrika, 33, 222–225.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, J. (1971), Comment on Basu, in Foundation of Statistical Inference, eds. V. P. Godambe and D. A. Sprott, Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanselman, D. H., Quinn II, T. J., Lunsford, C., Heifetz, J., and Clausen, D. (2003), “Applications in Adaptive Cluster Sampling of Gulf of Alaska Rockfish,” Fisheries Bulletin, 101, 501–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D. G., and Thompson, D. J. (1952), “A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–685.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. M., and Hampton, I. (1990), “A Stratified Random Transect Design for Acoustic Surveys of Fish Stocks,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47, 1282–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G., and Anderson, D. W. (1986), “Sampling Rare Populations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 149, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, N. C. H., Griffith, D., and Hunter, J. R. (1997), “Using Restricted Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Estimate Pacific Hake Larval Abundance,” CalCOFI Report, 37, 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, M. N. (1957), “Oredered and Unordered Estimators in Sampling Without Replacement,” Sankhyā, 18, 379–390.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, D. (1956), “Some Estimators in Sampling With Varying Probabilities Without Replacement,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 51, 269–284.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, M. M. (1999), “Rao-Blackwell Versions of the Horvitz-Thompson and Hansen-Hurwitz in Adaptive Cluster Sampling,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003), “Comparison Between Hansen-Hurwitz and Horvitz-Thompson for Adaptive Cluster Sampling,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10, 115–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M. M., and Seber, G. A. F. (1997), “Two-Stage Adaptive Cluster Sampling,” Biometrics, 53, 959–970.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001), “A New Proof of Murthy’s Estimator Which Applies to Sequential Sampling,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 43, 901–906.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992), Model Assisted Survey Sampling, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. R., Conroy, M. J., and Brakhage, D. H. (1995), “Efficiency of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimating Density of Wintering Waterfowl,” Biometrics, 51, 777–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. R., Villella, R. F., and Lemarie, D. P. (2003), “Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Low-Density Populations of Freshwater Mussels,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10, 7–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. R., Brown, J. A., and Lo, N. C. H. (2004), “Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Biological Populations,” in Sampling Rare or Elusive Species, ed. W. L. Thompson, Covelo, CA: Island Press, pp. 93–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., and Smith, D. R. (2003), A Guide to Sampling Freshwater Mussel Populations, Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. K. (1990), “Adaptive Cluster Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 1050–1059.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. K., and Seber, G. A. F. (1996), Adaptive Sampling, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salehi Mohammad M..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salehi, M.M., Smith, D.R. Two-stage sequential sampling: A neighborhood-free adaptive sampling procedure. JABES 10, 84–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571105X28183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571105X28183

Key Words

Navigation