Skip to main content
Log in

Use of covariates in Taylor’s power law for sequential sampling in pest management

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In pest management, the pest density within a group of plants needs to be estimated for taking timely actions, such as spraying pesticides or releasing natural enemies. Taylor’s power law is widely used for identifying the aggregation patterns of the pests and designing a sequential sampling plan to estimate the pest mean density. The conventional estimates given by Taylor’s power law do not consider potential density differences due to various covariates, but focus only on the relationship between the sample means and the variances.

In this article, we develop a new sequential sampling stop line based on Taylor’s power law by using quasi-likelihood with covariate effects. The simulation results show that the proposed estimators are better than the conventional estimators in terms of mean squared error. For validation and evaluation of the sampling stop line given by the proposed estimator, we use RVSP software in which actual observations are randomly and iteratively sampled until the total number of a pest reaches the stop line. We demonstrate both types of sequential sampling stop lines, those based on the conventional method and those based on the new method, for the population density of spider mites on glasshouse roses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, M. (1987), “Modelling Variance Heterogeneity in Normal Regression Using GLIM,” Applied Statistics, 36, 332–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, N. (1990a), “Further Studies in the Variability of Pock Counts,” Statistics in Medicine, 9, 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1990b), “Tests of Hypotheses in Overdispersed Poisson Regression and Other Quasi-Likelihood Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 565–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., and Ruppert, D. (1988), Transformation and Weighting in Regression, London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D., and Stefanski, L. A. (1995), Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models, London: Chapman & Hall, p. 270.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidian, M., and Carroll, R. J. (1987), “Variance Function Estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 1079–1091.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. M., and Pedigo, L. P. (1989), “Analysis of Spatial Patterns and Sequential Count Plans for Stalk Borer (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae),” Environmental Entomology, 18, 504–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diblasi, A., and Bowman, A. W. (2001), “On the Use of the Variogram in Checking for Independence in Spatial Data,” Biometrics, 57, 211–218.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H. (1970), “On Fixed Precision Level Sequential Sampling,” Researches on Population Ecology, 12, 249–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, W. D., Hogg, D. B., Poswal, M. A., Berberet, R. C., and Cuperus, G. W. (1988) “Implications of the Stochastic Nature of Kuno’s and Green’s Fixed-precision Stop Lines: Sampling Plans for the Pea Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Alfalfa as an Example,” Journal of Economic Entomology, 81, 749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models, London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1948), “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 10, 243–251.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, S. E., and Hutchison, W. D. (1997), “Validation of Arthropod Sampling Plans Using a Resampling Approach: Software and Analysis,” American Entomologist, 43, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A., and Lee, Y. (1992), “Likelihood, Quasi-likelihood, and Pseudolikelihood: Some Comparisons,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 273–284.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. N. (1981), “Taylor’s Power Law for Dependence of Variance on Mean in Animal Population,” Applied Statistics, 30, 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, (1997), SAS User’s Guide, 6.14., Cary, NC: SAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1993), SAS/STAT Software: The GENMOD Procedure, Technical Report P-243, 81–85.

  • Southwood, T. R. E. (1978), Ecological Methods (2nd ed.), London: Chapman and Hall, p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. R. (1961), “Aggregation, Variance and the Mean,” Nature (Lond.), 189, 732–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1974), “Monitoring Change in the Distribution and Abundance of Insects,” Annual Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1973(2), 202–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. A., Lindquist, R. K., and Shipp, J. L. (1998), “Variation and Consistency in Spatial Distribution as Measured by Taylor’s Power Law,” Environmental Entomology, 27, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1974), “Quasi-likelihood Functions, Generalized Linear Models and the Gauss-Newton Method,” Biometrika, 61, 439–447.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heungsun Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, H., Cho, K. Use of covariates in Taylor’s power law for sequential sampling in pest management. JABES 9, 462 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15746

Key Words

Navigation