Abstract
Modeling the number of uses of discrete habitat types by animals with a multinomial distribution, we illustrate the use of Bayesian methods to estimate selection. An advantage of this approach in assessing selection is the construction of credibility intervals that do not rely on large sample normal theory. In addition, credibility intervals for ranked selection of habitats are easily obtained. Bayes factors and Bayesian p values (posterior predictive values) are used to test the hypothesis of selection for each animal, test selection across all animals and for multiple comparisons among habitats. We compare our method to alternative methods for a real dataset. Freely available WinBUGS software is used to fit the model and test hypotheses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., and Kenward, R. E. (1993), “Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data,” Ecology, 74, 1313–1325.
Aitchison, J. (1986), The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data, New York: Chapman and Hall.
Alldredge, J. R., and Ratti, J. T. (1986), “Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 50, 157–165.
Alldredge, J. R., Thomas, D. L., and McDonald, L. L. (1998), “Survey and Comparison of Methods for Study of Resource Selection,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 237–253.
Barmi, H. E., and Pontius, J. S. (2000), “Testing Ordered Hypotheses in Animal Resource Selection Studies,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5, 88–101.
Casella, G., and George, E. E. (1992), “Explaining the Gibbs Sampler,” The American Statistician, 46, 167–174.
Congdon, P. (2001), Bayesian Statistical Modeling, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
—(2003), Applied Bayesian Modeling, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Dasgupta, N., and Alldredge, J. R. (1998), “A Multivariate Analysis of Resource Selection Data,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 323–334.
— (2002), “A Single Step Method for Identifying Individual Resources,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 208–221.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. (1995), Bayesian Data Analysis, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Gilks, W. R., Thomas, A., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1994), “A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling,” The Statistician, 43, 169–178.
Johnson, D. H. (1980), “The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference,” Ecology, 61, 65–71.
Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. (1995), “Bayes Factors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.
Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., Thomas, D. L., McDonald, T. L., and Erickson, W. P. (2002), Resource Selection by Animals; Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies (2nd ed.), London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Smith, L. E., Hupp, J. W., and Ratti, J. T. (1982), “Habitat Use and Home Range of Grey Partridge in Eastern South Dakota,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 580–587.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., and Best, N. G. (1999), WinBUGS Version 1.2 User Manual, MRC Biostatistics Unit.
Thomas, D. L., and Taylor, E. J. (1990), “Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Use and Availability,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 322–330.
White, G. C., and Garrott, R. A. (1990), Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data, San Diego, CA: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, D.L., Iianuzzi, C. & Barry, R.P. A Bayesian multinomial model for analyzing categorical habitat selection data. JABES 9, 432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15584
Received:
Revised:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15584