Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian multinomial model for analyzing categorical habitat selection data

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling the number of uses of discrete habitat types by animals with a multinomial distribution, we illustrate the use of Bayesian methods to estimate selection. An advantage of this approach in assessing selection is the construction of credibility intervals that do not rely on large sample normal theory. In addition, credibility intervals for ranked selection of habitats are easily obtained. Bayes factors and Bayesian p values (posterior predictive values) are used to test the hypothesis of selection for each animal, test selection across all animals and for multiple comparisons among habitats. We compare our method to alternative methods for a real dataset. Freely available WinBUGS software is used to fit the model and test hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., and Kenward, R. E. (1993), “Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data,” Ecology, 74, 1313–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. (1986), The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data, New York: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alldredge, J. R., and Ratti, J. T. (1986), “Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 50, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alldredge, J. R., Thomas, D. L., and McDonald, L. L. (1998), “Survey and Comparison of Methods for Study of Resource Selection,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 237–253.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barmi, H. E., and Pontius, J. S. (2000), “Testing Ordered Hypotheses in Animal Resource Selection Studies,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5, 88–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., and George, E. E. (1992), “Explaining the Gibbs Sampler,” The American Statistician, 46, 167–174.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, P. (2001), Bayesian Statistical Modeling, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —(2003), Applied Bayesian Modeling, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., and Alldredge, J. R. (1998), “A Multivariate Analysis of Resource Selection Data,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 323–334.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002), “A Single Step Method for Identifying Individual Resources,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. (1995), Bayesian Data Analysis, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R., Thomas, A., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1994), “A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling,” The Statistician, 43, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. H. (1980), “The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference,” Ecology, 61, 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. (1995), “Bayes Factors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., Thomas, D. L., McDonald, T. L., and Erickson, W. P. (2002), Resource Selection by Animals; Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies (2nd ed.), London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. E., Hupp, J. W., and Ratti, J. T. (1982), “Habitat Use and Home Range of Grey Partridge in Eastern South Dakota,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 580–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., and Best, N. G. (1999), WinBUGS Version 1.2 User Manual, MRC Biostatistics Unit.

  • Thomas, D. L., and Taylor, E. J. (1990), “Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Use and Availability,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C., and Garrott, R. A. (1990), Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data, San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana L. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, D.L., Iianuzzi, C. & Barry, R.P. A Bayesian multinomial model for analyzing categorical habitat selection data. JABES 9, 432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15584

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571104X15584

Key Words

Navigation