Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of survey estimates of the finite population variance

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has conducted several probability surveys of aquatic resources. Such surveys usually have unequal probability of including population elements in the sample. The Northeast lakes survey, which motivated this study of variance estimation, was such a survey. We examine ten estimators for the finite population variance using a Monte Carlo factorial experiment that considers three population characteristics. The results show that the correlation between the inclusion probabilities and the response is the most important factor that differentiates the estimators. Under conditions of low correlation (approximately <0.4), a common feature in environmental surveys, the sample variance is best, elsewhere, two ratio estimators, one based on consistency and the Horvitz-Thompson Theorem (HT) and the other based on the Yates-Grundy form, behave similarly and best.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akima, H. (1978), “A Method of Bivariate Interpolation and Smooth Surface Fitting for Irregularly Distributed Data Points,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 4, 148–159.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, K., and Hanif, M. (1983), Sampling With Unequal Probabilities, New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1977), Sampling Techniques (3rd Ed), New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dol, W., Steerneman, T., and Wansbeek, T. (1996), “Matrix Algebra and Sampling Theory: The Case of the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator,” Linear Algebra and its Applications, 237, 225–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, H., and Rao, J. (1962), “Sampling With Unequal Probability and Without Replacement,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 350–374.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hidiriglou, M., and Gray, G. (1980), “Construction of Joint Probability of Selection for Systematics p.p.s Sampling,” Applied Statistics, 29, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D., and Thompson, D. (1952), “A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–685.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D., and Christie, S. (1993), “EMAP-Surface Waters 1991 Pilot Report, Technical Report EPA/620/R-93/003,” Technical Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington D.C.

  • Larsen, D., Thorton, K., Urquhart, N., and Paulsen, S. (1995), “The Role of Sample Surveys for Monitoring the Condition of the Nation’s Lakes,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 32, 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., and Thompson, M. (1983), “Properties of Estimators of Quadratic Finite Population Functions: The Batch Approach,” The Annals of Statistics, 11, 275–285.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T. (1996), “Analysis of Finite Population Surveys: Sample Size and Testing Considerations,” Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University.

  • Mitch, M., Kaufmann, P., Herlihy, A., Overton, W., and Sale, M. (1990), “National Stream Survey Database Guide. EPN600/8-90/055,” Technical Report, U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis; Oregon.

  • Royall, R., and Cumberland, W. (1981), “An Empirical Study of the Ratio Estimator and Estimators of its Variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 66–88.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992), Model Assisted Survey Sampling, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S., and Overton, W. (1989), “Pairwise Inclusion Probability Formulas in Random-Order, Variable Probability, Systematic Sampling,” Technical Report 131, Oregon State University Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994a), “Comparison of Variance Estimators of the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator for Randomized Variable Probability Systematic Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 30–43.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1994b), “Environmental Sampling and Monitoring,” in Handbook of Statistics, eds. G. Patil and C. Rao, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. (1994), “Variable Density Grid-Based Sampling Designs for Continuous Spatial Populations,” Environmetrics, 8, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. K. (1992), Sampling, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, N., Paulsen, S., and Larsen, D. (1998), “Monitoring for Policy-Relevant Regional Trends Over Time,” Ecological Applications, 8, 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F., and Grundy, P. (1953), “Selection Without Replacement from Within Strata with Probability Proportional to Size,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 15, 253–261.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Yves P. Courbois.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Courbois, JY.P., Urquhart, N.S. Comparison of survey estimates of the finite population variance. JABES 9, 236–251 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711043596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711043596

Key Words

Navigation