Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the infection status of a herd

  • Editor’s Invited Article
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents hierarchical models for determining infection status and prevalence of infection within a herd given a hypergeometric or binomial sample of animals that have been screened with an imperfect test. Expert prior information on the infection status of the herd, diagnostic test accuracy, and herd prevalence is incorporated into the model. Posterior probabilities versus prior probabilities of infection are presented in the novel form of a curve, summarizing the probability of infection over a range of possible prior probability values. We demonstrate the model with serologic data for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) in dairy herds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulaga, L. L. (1998), “U.S. Voluntary Johne’s Disease Herd Status Program for Cattle,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the U.S. Animal Health Association, pp. 420–433.

  • Cameron, A. R., and Baldock, F. C. (1998a), “A New Probability Formula for Surveys to Substantiate Freedom from Disease,” Preventice Veterinary Medicine, 34, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b), “Two-Stage Sampling in Surveys to Substantiate Freedom for Disease,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 34, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, R. M. (2001), “Sense and Sensitivity—Designing Surveys Based on an Imperfect Test,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 49, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, R. M., and Roe, R. T. (1982), “Livestock Disease Surveys. A Field Manual for Veterinarians,” Bureau of Range Science, Department of Primary Industry, Australian Government Testing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., and Berger, R. (2002), Statistical Inference, (2nd ed.), Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. T., and Sockett, D. C. (1993), “Accuracy and Economics of the USDA-Licensed Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay for Bovine Paratuberculosis,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 203, 1456–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, C. H., and Zeng, Q. (1993), “Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Heartworm Antigen Detection Tests,” Canine Practitioner, 18, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargatz, D. A., Byrum, B. A., Barber, L. K., Sweeney, R. W., Shulaw, W. P., Jacobsen, R. H., and Stabel, J. R. (2001), “Evaluation of a Commercial ELISA for Diagnosis of Paratuberculosis in Cattle,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 218, 1163–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, J. P., Thulliez, P., Weigel, R. M., Andrews, C. D., Lind, P., and Powell, E. C. (1995), “Sensitivity and Specificity of Various Serologic Tests for Detection of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Naturally Infected Sows,” American Journal of Veterinary Research, 56, 1030–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enøe, C., Georgiadis, M. P., and Johnson, W. O. (2000), “Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Diagnostic Tests and Disease Prevalence When the True Disease State is Unknown,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastwirth, J. L., Johnson, W. O., and Reneau, D. M. (1991), “Bayesian Analysis of Screening Data: Application to AIDS in Blood Donors,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, 19, 135–150.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S., and Johnson, W. O. (1992), “Optimal Administration of Dual Screening Tests for Detecting a Characteristic with Special Reference to Low Prevalence Diseases,” Biometrics, 48, 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., and Smith, A. F. M. (1990), “Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, M., and Gardner, I. A. (2000), “Epidemiologic Issues in the Validation of Veterinary Diagnostic Tests,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, T. E., Johnson, W. O., and Gardner, I. A. (2003), “Hierarchical Models for Estimating Herd Prevalence and Test Accuracy in the Absence of a Gold-Standard,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. O., and Gastwirth, J. L. (1991), “Bayesian Inference for Medical Screening Tests: Approximations Useful for the Analysis of AIDS Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53, 427–439.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. O., Gastwirth, J. L., and Pearson, L. M. (2001), “Screening Without a Gold Standard: The Hui-Walter Paradigm Revisited,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 921–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L., Gyorkos, T. W., and Coupal, L. (1995), “Bayesian Estimation of Disease Prevalence and Parameters for Diagnostic Tests in the Absence of a Gold Standard,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suess, E. A., Gardner, I. A., and Johnson, W. O. (2002), “Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Prevalence Inferences and Determination of a Country’s Status for an Animal Pathogen,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 55, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, R. W., Whitlock, R. H., and Buckley, C. L. (1995), “Evaluation of a Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Diagnosis of Paratuberculosis in Dairy Cattle,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 7, 488–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1994), “Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions,” The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, R. H., Wells, S. J., Sweeney, R. W., and Van Tiem, J. (2000), “ELISA and Fecal Culture for Paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease); Sensitivity and Specificity of Each Method,” Veterinary Microbiology, 77, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy E. Hanson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanson, T.E., Johnson, W.O., Gardner, I.A. et al. Determining the infection status of a herd. JABES 8, 469 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711032561

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711032561

Key Words

Navigation