Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The cascade model is a standard model for food web data. This article describes a method for testing the cascade model that complements existing tests. Like existing tests, the new test is conditional on the number of links observed in the predation matrix. One important feature of the cascade model is that an ordering of species is required, but in practice the true order is unknown. This feature has important implications for tests of the model, both for the new test and for existing tests. The analysis here does not require a single assumed order. Some real food webs are used for illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A., (1992), “A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables,” Statistical Science, 7, 131–177.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M.J., (1987), “Testing for Misspecification in Models of Spatial Flows,” Environment and Planning A 19, 1153–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J. and Clifford, P., (1989), “Generalized Monte Carlo Significance Tests,” Biometrika, 76, 633–642.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.E., Briand, F. and Newman, C.M., (1990), The Structure of Food Webs: Data and Theory Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, R. E., and Stearns, S. C., (1982), “The Structure of Food Webs”, American Naturalist, 120, 478–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J., (1983), Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns, London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B., (1995), Bayesian Data Analysis London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldwasser, L., and Rough garden, J., (1997), “Sampling Effects and the Estimation of Food Web Properties.” Ecology, 78, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., (1997), Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A., (1989), Generalized Linear Models, London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. G., Blumenshine, S. C., Duplisea, D. E., Jonsson, T., and Rashleigh, B., (2000), “Body Size and Food Web Structure: Testing the Equiprobability Assumption of the Cascade Model,” Oecologia, 123, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L., (1982), Food Webs, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., Jana, R., and Bandyopadhyay, S., (1996), “A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Generating Random (0,1)-Matrices with Given Marginals,” Sankhya A, 58, 225–242.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., (1997), Simulation, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, A. R., (1996), “On the Goodness of Fit of the Cascade Model” Ecology, 77, 1294–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, A. R., and Beet, A. R., (1998), “On Lumping Species in Food Webs,” Ecology, 79, 2013–2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., and Martinez, N. D., (2000), “Simple Rules Yield Complex Food Webs,” Nature, 404, 180–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, J.M. Testing the cascade model for food webs. JABES 8, 196–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711031544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711031544

Key Words

Navigation