Abstract
Many incomplete block design strategies have been devised to improve the efficiency of experiments. However, the constraints imposed by these designs can be unrealistic because natural blocks may not be all the same size or there may be no conventional designs for required treatment, replication, block and plot combinations. In addition, because of similar constraints, two-dimensional block designs—the so called row-column designs— are used less frequently than the occurrence of conditions where their use would result in greater experimental efficiency. This article explores the properties of an easy to use random generation and selection strategy for obtaining block and row-column designs. Although the strategy does not necessarily obtain the best possible designs when judged by any one of the many criteria, this apparent disad vantage is outweighed by the generality and ease of use. It is concluded that present-day model fitting methods remove the constraints which have been traditionally imposed on designs and the benefits of using block designs can be extended by the use of informal design methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1957), Experimental Designs (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
Ipinyomi, R. A., and John, J. A. (1985), “Nested, Generalized Cyclic Row-Column Designs,” Biometrika, 72, 403–409.
John, J. A., and Whitaker, D. (1993), “Construction of Resolvable Row-Column Designs by Simulated Annealing,” Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 237–245
John, J. A., and Williams, E. R. (1995), Cyclic and Computer Generated Designs (2nd ed.), London: Chapman and Hall.
Nguyen, N.-K., and Williams, E. R. (1993), “An Algorithm for Constructing Optimal Resolvable Row-Column Designs,” Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 363–370
Patterson, H. D., and Thompson, R. (1971), “Recovery of Inter-Block Information When Block Sizes are Unequal,” Biometrika, 58, 545–554.
Pearce, S. C. (1964), “Experimenting With Blocks of Natural Size,” Biometrics, 20, 699–706.
Russell, K. G. (1999), “A Comparison of Six Methods of Analysing Row-Column Designs With Inter-Block Information,” Statistics and Computing, 9, 239–246.
Shah, K. R. (1960), “Optimality Criteria for Incomplete Block Designs,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 235–247.
Venables, W. N., and Eccleston, J. A. (1993), “Randomized Search Strategies for Finding Near Optimal Block or Row-Column Designs,” Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 371–382.
Whitaker, D., Williams, E. R., and John, J. A. (2002), CycDesigN, Version 2: A Package for the Computer Generation of Experimental Designs, Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.
Williams, E. R., and Talbot, M. (1993), ALPHA+: Experimental Designs for Variety Trials, Canberra, Australia: CSIRO
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnstone, P. Random generation and selection of one- and two-dimensional designs for experiments on blocks of natural size. JABES 8, 67–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711031193
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711031193