Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics volume 13, pages478–496(2008)Cite this article

Abstract

This article presents confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions estimated from pooled samples with unequal pool sizes. Asymptotic methods are used to derive Wald, profile score, and profile likelihood ratio intervals. Corrections for bias and skewness of the distribution of the Studentized score statistic are used to improve the profile score interval. Further, the easily computed Wilson score-based interval of Newcombe is adapted. Coverage and noncoverage probabilities and expected lengths of the confidence intervals are estimated for a range of parameter values expected in application, for both one- and two-sample cases. The skewness-corrected profile score interval is generally recommended. The methods are applied to a comparison of West Nile virus mosquito infection prevalences by trapping height in field collections from Louisiana in 2003.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barndorff-Nielsen, O., and Cox, D. (1994), Inference and Asymptotics, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett, M. S. (1953a), “Approximate Confidence Intervals,” Biometrika, 40, 12–19.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. — (1953b), “Approximate Confidence Intervals: II. More Than one Unknown Parameter,” Biometrika, 40, 306–317.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. — (1955), “Approximate Confidence Intervals: III. A Bias Correction,” Biometrika, 42, 201–204.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C. L., and Swallow, W. H. (1990), “Using Group Testing to Estimate a Proportion, and to Test the Binomial Model,” Biometrics, 46, 1035–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang, C. L., and Reeves, W. C. (1962), “Statistical Estimation of Virus Infection Rates in Mosquito Vector Populations,” American Journal of Hygiene, 75, 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davison, A., and Hinkley, D. (1997), Bootstrap Methods and Their Application, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorfman, R. (1943), “The Detection of Defective Members of Large Populations,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrington, C. P. (1992), “Estimating Prevalence by Group Testing using Generalized Linear Models,” Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1591–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gart, J. J. (1991), “An Application of Score Methodology: Confidence Intervals and Tests of Fit for One-Hit Curves,” in Handbook of Statistics, volume 8, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gart, J. J., and Nam, J.-M. (1990), “Approximate Interval Estimation of the Difference in Binomial Parameters: Correction for Skewness and Extension to Multiple Tables,” Biometrics, 46, 637–643.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Godsey, M., King, R., Burkhalter, K., Colton, L., Sutherland, G., Charnetzky, D., Ezenwa, V., Coffee, M., Milheim, L., Delorey, M., Palmisano, C., Wesson, D., Taylor, V., and Guptill, S. (2008), “Ecology of Potential Vectors of West Nile Virus, Southeastern Louisiana,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, in preparation.

  13. Hauck, W. W. (1991), “Confidence Intervals for Seroprevalence Determined from Pooled Sera,” Annals of Epidemiology, 1, 277–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hepworth, G. (1996), “Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing,” Biometrics, 52, 1134–1146.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hepworth, G.(1999), Estimation of Proportions by Group Testing, PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne.

  16. — (2005), “Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing with Groups of Unequal Size,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 10, 478–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCann, M. H., and Tebbs, J. M. (2007), “Pairwise Comparisons for Proportions Estimated by Pooled Testing,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 1278–1290.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Newcombe, R. G. (1998), “Interval Estimation for the Difference Between Independent Proportions: Comparison of Eleven Methods,” Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobel, M., and Elashoff, R. M. (1975), “Group Testing with a New Goal, Estimation,” Biometrika, 62, 181–193.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Tu, X. M., Litvak, E., and Pagano, M. (1995), “On the Informativeness and Accuracy of Pooled Testing in Estimating Prevalence of a Rare Disease: Application to HIV Screening,” Biometrika, 82, 287–297.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter, S. D., Hildreth, S.W., and Beaty, B. J. (1980), “Estimation of Infection Rates in Population of Organisms using Pools of Variable Size,” American Joural of Epidemiology, 112, 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, E. B. (1927), “Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Mathematical Statistician, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-Borne and Enteric Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3150 Rampart Road, 80521, Fort Collins, CO

    Brad J Biggerstaff

Authors
  1. Brad J Biggerstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad J Biggerstaff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biggerstaff, B.J. Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples. JABES 13, 478–496 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571108X379055

Download citation

Key Words

  • Binomial
  • Group testing
  • Profile likelihood
  • Profile score
  • Score
  • West Nile virus