Advertisement

Small area estimation in a Watershed erosion assessment survey

  • J. D. OpsomerEmail author
  • C. Botts
  • J. Y. Kim
Article

Abstract

This article describes an application of small area estimation in a survey conducted in the Rathbun Lake Watershed in Iowa (USA). From a sample of 183 plots in the watershed, erosion from four sources as well as total erosion are estimated for 61 small areas within the study region. Information on land cover and topography from GIS coverages are used to create plot-level covariates for the regression model. Two estimators are discussed in the article: an empirical best linear unbiased predictor and a composite estimator. The latter estimator is potentially less efficient than the former, but preserves the additivity between the estimates for the four erosion sources and the total erosion. For this survey, the estimated efficiency loss is shown to be very small.

Key Words

Best linear unbiased prediction Mixed effect linear regression Natural resources survey 

References

  1. Battese, G., Harter, R., and Fuller, W. (1988), “An Error-Components Model for Prediction of County Crop Areas Using Survey and Satellite Data,” Journal of the AMerican Statistical Association, 83, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Efron, B., and Morris, C. (1973), “Stein’s Estimation Rule and its Competitors—An Empirical Bayes Approach,” Journal of the AMerican Statistical Association, 68, 117–130.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghosh, M., and Rao, J. N. K. (1994), “Small Area Estimation: An Appraisal,” Statistical Science, 9, 55–93.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Harville, D. (1985), “Decomposition of Prediction Error,” Journal of the AMerican Statistical Association, 80, 132–138.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Opsomer, J., Wu, Z., Sitzmann, V., Jacobsen, T., and Kim, J. (2001), “Environmental Assessment for the Rathbun Lake Watershed: Sampling Design, Methods and Results,” Preprint 01-13, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  6. Robinson, G. (1991), “That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects” (with discussion), Statistical Science, 6, 15–51.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992), Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Troeh, F., Hobbs, J., and Donahue, R. (1999), Soil and Water Conservation—Productivity and Environmental Protection, Upper Saddler River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsIowa State UniversityAmes

Personalised recommendations